Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 6

< December 5	December 7 >

December 6[edit]

File:Pushpraj Ruhal in 2003.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 13:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photos, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 11:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Forton Creek P1010015.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of painting. Evidence of permission from artist is required. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RedHawks Cap.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For baseball teams, cap logos are a form of secondary identification and most are distinct enough from the primary logo to warrant using both. However, in this case, the cap and primary logos are essentially identical except for the background color, so having both fails WP:NFCC #3a. Hog Farm _Talk 23:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The images are almost identical, so there is no need for both. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. -- Whpq (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.