Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 22

< November 21	November 23 >

November 22[edit]

File:Jimmy Kimmel Live.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: (non-admin closure) Converted to {{PD-textlogo}}, no need to keep discussion open. echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:FDDE:F8D3:4223:4F9F (talk) 04:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Converted As the uploader of the image, I have gone ahead and converted it to {{PD-textlogo}}, and apologise that I didn't do that in the first place. As I have done this, I will now close the discussion. In the future, when a mistake has clearly been made (like I did), you can do it yourself. (Let me know if I've done anything wrong, first time at FfD) Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Late Late Show With James Corden Logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. Furthermore, the neon effect is considered to be de minimis by Chapter 900 : 13 Paragraph 5 of Compendium Of U.S. Copyright Office Practises Third Edition:

"Typeface ornamentation that is separable from the typeface characters is almost always an add-on to the beginning and/or ending of the characters. To the extent that such flourishes, swirls, vector ornaments, scrollwork, borders and frames, wreaths, and the like represent works of pictorial or graphic authorship in either their individual designs or patterned repetitions, they may be protected by copyright. However, the mere use of text effects (including chalk, popup papercraft, neon, beer glass, spooky-fog, and weathered-and-worn), while potentially separable, is de minimis and not sufficient to support a registration." 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:FDDE:F8D3:4223:4F9F (talk) 04:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Convert per nom I just don't understand why this just isn't done rather than adding a WP:BURO step here. If I'd object, I'd revert the change as the uploader. I won't. Do what the Nike slogan says and Just Do It. Nate • (chatter) 05:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nepenthes angasanensis distribution.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Nepenthes densiflora distribution.png on Commons. ✗plicit 06:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 14:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David heath joan collins.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded for David Heath (solicitor). No other use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David heath spielberg.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded for David Heath (solicitor). No other use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Edited 6197.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

file name claims that this file has been edited. Source needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DenisTarasovLebedevka1991.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Demonfmstudio.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Whpq (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 remaining uploads, all of different quality and sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, sorry, I was a presenter and management team member of Demon FM for ~2 years. This is a photo I took. Benhodgson (talk) 11:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Demonfmstudio-producerview.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Whpq (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 remaining uploads, all of different quality and sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again my own work, sorry. Benhodgson (talk) 11:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rickedwards-wiki.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Whpq (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3 remaining uploads, all of different quality and sizes. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:45, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As above. This was taken at the Student Radio Awards in London, 2007 as part of my work with Demon FM. My own work. Benhodgson (talk) 11:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derik gap fall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, uploads of varying sizes, contains "blotches" as such, suggesting that this is a photo of a photo. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derik landscape 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 14:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, uploads of varying sizes, contains "blotches" as such, suggesting that this is a photo of a photo. Permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dames production.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could easily be replaced by a file like File:OverPoolFootlightParade33Trailer.jpg, fails WP:NFCCP#1. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article already has in it an image from Footlight Parade. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the NFUR does not provide any clear purpose, but looking at the Busby Berkeley article, the caption states "A typical Busby Berkeley geometrical arrangement of dancers..." which seems like the purpose. Given that there is a free file that depicts such a geometrical arrangement as noted in the nomination, the use of this file does not meet WP:NFCC#1. That there is already an image from Footlight Parade in the article has no bearing on replaceability as a non-free image. -- Whpq (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. Noting for the record that there is a free equivalent available, and upon reviewing the text of the article, I found no substantial sourced critical commentary/coverage. -FASTILY 01:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diamond.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think Google Sketchup is freely licensed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a general rule that works created using non-free software are themselves derivatives of the tools used to create them? I was under the impression that only screenshots were problematic. Commons at least also has a whole category of images made using SketchUp. Felix QW (talk) 20:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused drawing. There is no issue with the licensing. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nokia 6630 Aluminium Grey.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The copyrighted screen is probably not de minimis. Copyright issues aside, the quality is pretty terrible. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Asiatic Barred Zone.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect disused map, superseded by File:Map showing Asiatic zone prescribed in section three of Immigration Act, the natives of which are excluded from the United State, with certain exceptions.jpg. Should be removed to prevent confusion. Apocheir (talk) 20:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.