Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 July 17

July 17

File:Nagpur Metro Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason provided that the logo is PD — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question does it not satisfy {{PD-textlogo}}, as it consists solely of words and simple geometric shapes? Joseph2302 (talk) 15:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relicense to {{PD-textlogo}} and move to Commons. Below the threshold of originality in the US, and per c:COM:TOO India, India has a similar TOO to the US. House Blaster^talk 02:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nagpur Smart City Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two different authors are specified - Nagpur Municipal Corporation and MoHUA. Which is it? How is the work PD? — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence this is a public domain logo. It's way too detailed to be {{PD-textlogo}}, and the website linked in the file information says "© 2022 Elets Technomedia Pvt Ltd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED". Joseph2302 (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MM Leftovers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC as this cover is not discussed critically or used for educational purposes. We already have one non-free cover and this is not adding enough value to justify inclusion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operation Doomsday Complete.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is some very brief discussion of the cover art and why it was changed but 1.) it is speculative, 2.) passing, 3.) not discussed at length (very similar to #2), 4.) does not go into detail into what was changed, why, etc., 5.) does not refer to all three of the covers presented, and 6.) does not actually require three pieces of non-free media. The differences between the first two are pretty marginal and can be adequately discussed in text, so they fail WP:NFCC, but the third one also does as there is not an extended, sourced section about the cover art: just a single fairly off-hand reference. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operation Doomsday Remastered (2015).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is some very brief discussion of the cover art and why it was changed but 1.) it is speculative, 2.) passing, 3.) not discussed at length (very similar to #2), 4.) does not go into detail into what was changed, why, etc., 5.) does not refer to all three of the covers presented, and 6.) does not actually require three pieces of non-free media. The differences between the first two are pretty marginal and can be adequately discussed in text, so they fail WP:NFCC, but the third one also does as there is not an extended, sourced section about the cover art: just a single fairly off-hand reference. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doombar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 as we have a free image which contains the current logo, File:Interior of the New Inn, Wetherby (27th January 2019) 006.jpg. This is an older version of the logo, and so fails WP:NFCC#8 as having this old logo doesn't significantly enhance the article Joseph2302 (talk) 12:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Romantic poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#3a + WP:NFCC#8 // + File:Dr. Romantic 2 poster.jpg — Ирука¹³ 15:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it is significant for the article. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 18:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The files fail WP:NFCC#3a since there is already a file for season three in the infobox and fails WP:NFCC#8 since there is no critical commentary of the files themselves. Aspects (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment we don't need both File:Dr. Romantic poster.jpg and File:Dr. Romantic 2 poster.jpg. But why is the 2 poster the one that should be kept, rather than this one? They seem pretty similar images to me. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a rationale for one poster. Any two others must be removed. — Ирука¹³ 15:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Royal Mail.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 July 25. (non-admin closure) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 05:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Mail.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.