Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 7

< March 6	March 8 >

March 7[edit]

File:ChefSP.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A non-free infobox image already serves a similar purpose of illustrating the subject in question. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 03:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, there is already another better fair use image in the infobox, so this one is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Melbourne ferry logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace, superseded by File:Melbourne ferry logo.svg. No apparent need to keep this as attribution to this file is not required. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there is no point in keeping it. HoHo3143 (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have applied the CSD G7 tag to the image. Techie3 (talk) 01:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lionel Soccoia during the match in 2018.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a screenshot, uploader's talk page has multiple file-deletion related tags. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete screenshot so not own work. If it is their own work, the user would need to use the WP:OTRS process to verify this. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nathan Bourdeau-Rochester Rhinos 2015 USL Regular Season Champion.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Screenshot" stated in exif, doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete screenshot so not own work. If it is their own work, the user would need to use the WP:OTRS process to verify this. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blue Origin NS-23 Failure.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Clearly a non-free file. No prejudice to restoration if someone is able to create a valid fair use claim for the file. -FASTILY 03:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a screen grab from a YouTube video [1] (around the 1:21:49 mark). Source video does not indicate a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to fairuse I doubt it is the uploader's image, since the Texas site is fairly remote and private property, restricting access, so unlike Boca Chica, or Space Coast, no cameras would be nearby except authorized or official ones. Convert to fairuse indicating Blue Origin's video -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 04:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- What non-free use rationale would apply? -- Whpq (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.