Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 May 30

May 30

File:Orde M. Coombs NY.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails WP:NFCC. Per point #9, there is no sourced, critical commentary of the cover image, just a passing mention that he was on the cover. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:DECORATIVE non-free use per WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and item #9 of WP:NFC#UUI. The simple descriptive statement "Coombs was featured on the cover of the November 20, 1972 issue of New York Magazine." in Orde M. Coombs#Biography isn't really even close the type of sourced critical commentary required by WP:NFCC#8. Moreover, simply adding that statement together with a {{citation needed}} template as part of the same edit so as to try and justify the file's non-free use kind shows a very superficial understanding (at best) or not only WP:NFCC but also WP:BURDEN. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete random clutter Dronebogus (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Regina Jacobs Bus Stop.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it's a copyright violation with little conceivable use. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 12:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it could be cropped down to sub-TOO text but why bother for a random image of a bench? Dronebogus (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BohlandTheSower1952.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we could apply {{PD-US-no notice}} to the sculpture as the inscription does not seem to contain a copyright notice. [1] Ixfd64 (talk) 23:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's relicense it then. Thank you for your diligent work digging up all these photos of sculptures. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 12:04, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cc etrusca.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus -FASTILY 01:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, 2007 low-quality example of a map of a fictional location. This was originally added as an illustration in Constructed world,[2] which was merged into Worldbuilding in 2008,[3] where it has been superseded by higher-quality examples. The author has since retired from Wikipedia. – Fayenatic London 14:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's currently being used in the article Campaign Cartographer.

BOZ (talk) 12:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Commons, as it's mediocre quality, but being used somewhere. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 09:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don’t get how this is appropriate for Commons as it appears unfree. It also does not appear particularly useful to its parent article. Dronebogus (talk) 12:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for use in Campaign Cartographer. Not eligible for Commons; licence terms include "You may not redistribute any map that in our sole opinion is, or appears to be, for the purpose of disseminating OUR ARTWORK." Stifle (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.