Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 September 4

September 4

File:Albanian Institute of Royal Studies 1942.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photo would have entered the public domain in Albania in 2015 if it had been published in the year it was taken. — Ирука¹³ 00:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and restore in 2038 as US copyright will have been restored by the URAA in 1996. Felix QW (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roman Reigns Universal Champion.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Properly attributed derivative image. If you believe the source image is improperly licensed, then the case for deletion needs to be made on Commons where the source image is hosted. Whpq (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The image has no source outside of Wikipedias. — Ирука¹³ 01:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: See upload log for the source picture, this was claimed as own work. Looks to be a poorly done file transfer from enwiki to commons. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 13:53, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was claimed as "Original work", created by some "Jason Lykens". Administrators may be able to find the metadata in a remote file. — Ирука¹³ 20:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand what you mean by "Administrators may be able to find the metadata in a remote file". The upload log I provided clearly states that the uploader was User:JDC808 —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 13:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who may or may not have been Jason Lykens. — Ирука¹³ 23:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jason is an IRL friend of mine who gave me permission to upload the image. I'm not sure what happened in the transfer with the original upload, but that "source" shouldn't be there as the source. --JDC808 ♫ 00:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When uploading images taken by third parties, you should verify the licensing status of the file. — Ирука¹³ 02:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 September 14. Whpq (talk) 02:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stockport-County-1914-15-400px.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Grand Unified Democratic New Party logo.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as a duplicate of Commons (F8) Whpq (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused non-free image Sangjinhwa (talk) 11:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. jp×g 22:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Commons clearly below TOO of South Korea and the US. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 13:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as WP:CSD F8. A duplicate copy on Commons is available. S5A-0043^Talk 10:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Combat path of the Soviet 414th Rifle Division in the Crimean Offensive (1944).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The said law does not apply to maps. There is no other reason for a file to be free. — Ирука¹³ 20:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nominator has not provided any basis for the legal claim; however, this is a public-domain image that is available on Commons. jp×g 22:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultramagnus2.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image inserted in the article without any supplementing justifiable commentary. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it should be integrated into an infobox as what the character's original appearance is, when it first appears in G1. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 06:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.