Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 February 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 4

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forecasts.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chrisguyot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused screenshot of non-free software. It is mentioned in the KXEN Inc. article, but it's not clear if this qualifies for fair use as the article is mainly about the company. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mario and Luigi Paper Jam Luigi.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Panini! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File does not substantially aid the article. The design of Luigi in the Mario and Luigi series does not substantially deviate from any of the other designs, such as the infobox image and Luigi's Mansion images already in the article, and it does not aid in discussing further commentary, analysis, or description of the character. It seems highly redundant and thus does not really need to be there. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.