Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 December 10

< December 9	December 11 >

December 10[edit]

File:TalaBirell.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TalaBirell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Tala Birell was active between 1926 and 1955, [1] and worked in Europe during her early years. [2] So very unlikely PD-US. --Draftlock (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Towards Design In Poetry.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Towards Design In Poetry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Book cover; author = Eric Mottram; no source or metadata. No indication uploader is author or (c) holder [n.b. this is a relisting of a malformed nomination from last month] Skier Dude (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Elinorfair.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elinorfair.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File indicates this was taken before 1923, however there's no source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Joannmansoncrop.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joannmansoncrop.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

unevidenced PD claim on image from commercial website Tb (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC) (See File_talk:Joannmansoncrop.png)[reply]
- {{dp-nopermission}} already there, the file will be deleted after 17 December if no evidence is forthcoming. --JD554 (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tube map minus the river.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Image of map is still under the copyright of Transport for London. — ξ ^xplicit 05:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tube map minus the river.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

The copyright of the map belongs to Transport for London. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the UK for 2D artworks, see commons:COM:FOP#United_Kingdom. Image could perhaps be used under fair use, however, there is already an adequate fair use image of the tube map available File:Tube map thumbnail.png. JD554 (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The File:Tube map thumbnail.png map still has the river, this photo was meant to illustrate the map without the river in context with beck plaque. The map in the photograph isn't of high enough resolution be used as a map. I'm not particularly attached to this photo though. Can we find a better fair use image of the of the riverless map? Grim²³ ★ 18:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure we need to find a new image. WP:NFCC#8 says we should only use non-free images if it aids a readers understanding. I'm not sure that couldn't simply be done by saying that there is a version of the map which doesn't have the route of the River Thames on it, ie the same as the existing map but for the river. --JD554 (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

keep This is actually not an image of a map, but an oblique photo of a wall, which happens to include a plaque and a map. It does not show the map in sufficient detail as to be useable as a way of finding one's way, and it does not show it as a flat, 2D image. It does show a specific version of the iconic London Underground map (sans river) which has attracted much media attention, and as a result of local pressure, will not be reissued. On all these grounds, I feel it should remain. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 11:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the title of the image and the image description, I'll assume your comment about "an oblique photo of a wall" is meant tongue-in-cheek. The fact remains the copyright of the poster belongs with Transport for London. --JD554 (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Taking a photo of a poster doesn't make it yours. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per Eskog. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Norton 360 4.0 beta.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norton 360 4.0 beta.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Screenshot of commercial software, can't actually be CC-BY-SA/GFDL HamburgerRadio (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vidya Balan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vidya Balan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Delete: Clearly a non-free image from Times of India http://photogallery.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2567372.cms Image popup says: "Copyright 2009 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. Use of images without permission not allowed." Professional image sourced to Picasweb by uploaded also found elsewhere on the internet by tineye is likely copyright and does not have a valid CC licence as applied. It is more likely originally sourced to this watermarked image [3]. ww2censor (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: http://picasaweb.google.com/sharma19kapil is a collection of non-free images collected by the picasa user from random sites. Dont know why he licenses his picasa account, seems like he is totaly unaware of what a license means. commons:Template:Flickrvionote describes the deletion reason. --Martin H. (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Buc metro map 2009.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buc metro map 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Doesn't appear to be uploader's own work. Copyright probably held by the transit authority. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are many maps of Bucharest metro on Google images. Not all are made the transit authority; the official ones have clear markings, like this. The one up for deletion looks like made by a third party, found a copy here; most probably not public domain or the uploader's creation though. Pcap ping 20:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FallinupBAND.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FallinupBAND.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like a professional photograph. Unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EmmureBAND.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EmmureBAND.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Given uploader's other contributions, this is unlikely his/her own work. Looks like a professional band photo. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:56, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Blood Red Throne.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blood Red Throne.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Given uploader's other contributions, this is likely another professional band photo, and rights aren't held by the uploader. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brewkeeper.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brewkeeper.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is possibly a logo - and thus derivative of the work by whoever owns it.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:June102006 026.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Revert & Keep; old copyvio versions deleted. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:June102006 026.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a collage of web sources, including http://biewerterriers.com/BiewerTerrierArticle.html, and http://biewer-btca.com/, uploaded by now blocked user Jezhotwells (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We can revert to the earliest version (whomever uploaded the new one overwrote an older, pretty likely free use image) and just delete the others. I think that'd be pretty appropriate since the newer image is pretty clearly copyvio. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 15:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert: to obviously freely licenced image overwritten by this copyvio. Perhaps the closing admin can purge the current image from the record. ww2censor (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: reverting to the original would be a good outcome. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.