Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 November 26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
November 26
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Aiwan 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- TinEye finds multiple matches for this image. Claimed copyright status seems implausible on the face of it. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Aiwan 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As previous item. TinEye finds multiple matches for this image. Claimed copyright status seems unlikely. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Aiwan1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- As previous two. TinEye gets multiple matches for this image. Claimed copyright status improbable. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily deleted under CSD F5 Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lennabm.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is recognisable as well known stock image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fightstar Montage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploader claims personal photos were used, but far right image is imprinted with text suggesting otherwise. Uploader unresponsive on the issue on his or her talk page with neither explanation of text or evidence of ownership. Same image under a different name: File:Fightstar.jpg. Rehevkor ✉ 04:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SmartGrids.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not own work, Source in image/metadata don't support it being uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Maroons Shield.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of 2D Artwork- No indication of original artwork's Authour Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PresidentJoseLaurel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Conflicting licensing information; not enough source information to verify that it is PD-Philippines. If non-free, it needs to be removed from List of Presidents of the Philippines. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PresidentSergioOsmeña.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Same as above. Contradictory license tagging in an attempt to include the image on list article(s), but source information is insufficient to verify the PD-Philippines claim. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No evidence offered of publication date and thus PD status so {{PD-Philippines}} removed. Image marked as non-free, usage should be limited to Manuel Roxas article only. Other rationales/uses removed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Manuelroxas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Same as above. Contradictory license tagging in an attempt to include the image on list article(s), but source information is insufficient to verify the PD-Philippines claim. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Same as above. Contradictory license tagging in an attempt to include the image on list article(s), but source information is insufficient to verify the PD-Philippines claim. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No evidence offered of publication date and thus PD status so {{PD-Philippines}} removed. Image marked as non-free, usage should be limited to Carlos P. Garcia article only. Other rationales/uses removed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Presidentcarlospgarcia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Same as above. Contradictory license tagging in an attempt to include the image on list article(s), but source information is insufficient to verify the PD-Philippines claim. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mwsff logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Corporate Logo - no source, no metadata ,if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder; if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sachin-pilot-Gurjar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Metadata=photoshop, no (c) given for the base image used Skier Dude (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hiroshi shimizu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unknown copyright status due to lack of informations.--Trixt (talk) 22:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LeeJunKi 2009Taiwan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Along with other users the uplaoder of this image is a sockpuppet of a serious copyright violation uploader User:InkHeart. Also he had copyright violations on Commons and is suspected to fake OTRS tickets (see the PUI requests on en:File:ParkSiYoun2009.jpg, en:File:Ryeowon001jv0.jpg, File:Daniel&RyuWon2005.jpg. Also he is uploading images under the claim that they where provided via photosubmission, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=FranNatta. In summary: All claims are wrong, delete all contributions by this uploader and related sockpuppets and have an critical eye on the articles he tries to decorate with stolen images. Martin H. (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.