Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 July 23

< July 22	July 24 >

July 23[edit]

File:DSCN4664 kilbourneplat e.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN4664 kilbourneplat e.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is a photograph of someone else's creative work, which is undated and unsourced in its related article. We would have to have more detail about the original to be sure of its copyright status. Rodhull andemu 00:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:DSCN4791.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN4791.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Marketing design is copyrighted, as is the registered trademark. This image is not free and requires a fair-use rationale. Also, it's a poor image to depict what it is intended to. Rodhull andemu 00:29, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BodogEuropeHomepage.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BodogEuropeHomepage.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Obviously not created by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 02:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AlwynMorris.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlwynMorris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unlikely to be released under CC license. Eeekster (talk) 02:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PreviewImageStandart1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PreviewImageStandart1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It's not likely that the uploader created this certificate. Eeekster (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PreviewImageStandart.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PreviewImageStandart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It's not likely that the uploader created this certificate. Eeekster (talk) 08:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:New partners.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:New partners.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like an official photo that is unlikely the property of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 08:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Where_Do_I_Go_From_Here_(5th_Printing)_Zac_Poonen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Where Do I Go From Here (5th Printing) Zac Poonen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Creative Commons license given is NC-ND, This is not compatible with Wikipedia's meaning of free Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am new to different Creative Common licences. I am uploading on behalf of the image owner. Will using the Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 India resolve the issue? --Cfcr (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No it will not, because NC licenses are not 'free'. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have switched to using CC Attrib license for this image. I hope this addresses the PUF issue for this image.

I am also using the same CC Atrib license for the following files that I also uploaded on the same day.

File:Beauty For Ashes (1980) Zac Poonen.jpg
File:One Body In Christ Zac Poonen.jpg
File:Radiating His Glory (1982) Zac Poonen.jpg

Thanks . --Cfcr (talk) 19:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC) --Cfcr (talk) 04:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AustraliaSeaking.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AustraliaSeaking.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This photograph appears to have been taken from the flight deck of the Australian carrier HMAS Melbourne. It seems unlikely then that it was taken by an employee of the USN, as is claimed in the image license tag. More information about its source needs to be provided to confirm that it really is what it is claimed to be, otherwise I regret (because it is a good image) that the image should be deleted. I note that the uploader was given an indefinite block in 2006 for irregularities in using the Commons, plus his user page is littered with copy vio warnings on numerous images. Nick Thorne ^talk 12:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- The image was indeed from the HMAS Melbourne. This image appears at the Fleet Air Arm Association of Australia web site. I don't know where they got it from. -- Whpq (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the Picture Gallery - Helicopters page, the web site states: We acknowledge and thank the RAN and HMAS Albatross for many of these photographs. In the absence of any conclusive evidence (or any evidence at all) that the image is free of copyright restrictions, I think we have to delete it. - Nick Thorne ^talk 22:20, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the URL for the photo on the FAAAOA web site has been added as a source. We have no way of knowing if this actually was the original source for the image, but assuming it was, then that changes nothing. There is no information on that site releasing any of its images and indeed it implies that the imageas are used with permission - ie the copyright belongs to someone else. There is still absolutely no evidence that this image has been released to the public domain. - Nick Thorne ^talk 02:17, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Coat of arms of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Yes, the coat of arms is from 1912, but there is no assertion if this drawing is from 1912. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 18:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Uprb azul.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uprb azul.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It is a logo of a University and it can not be PD-old so we need a permission to keep this. MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pamjatnyk Stepanu Banderi u L'vovi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pamjatnyk Stepanu Banderi u L'vovi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. MGA73 (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.