Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 7

< September 6	September 8 >

September 7[edit]

File:Mellongreen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mellongreen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. No EXIF data. Web-resolution. Image is unused. The user was warned in 2008 that the copyright status of this image was suspicious. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PittsburghPostGazetteBuilding.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PittsburghPostGazetteBuilding.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. It looks like it was cropped from a larger image, but we have no way on knowing what that source was. Image is unused. Web-resolution. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9.GrapedApe (talk) 03:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ChathamVillage2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChathamVillage2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. No EXIF data. Web-resolution. The user was warned in 2008 that the copyright status of this image was suspicious. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ChathamVillage.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChathamVillage.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. No EXIF data. Web-resolution. Image is unused. The user was warned in 2008 that the copyright status of this image was suspicious. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arbridges.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbridges.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. No EXIF data. Web-resolution. Image is unused. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Alleghenycenter5.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alleghenycenter5.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. It looks like it was cropped from a larger image, but we have no way on knowing what that source was. Web-resolution. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HUClocktower.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HUClocktower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the source cannot be determined. It looks like it was cropped from a larger image, but we have no way on knowing what that source was. Web-resolution. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 03:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Margaret shelby.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Margaret shelby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

We simply do not have enough information about this image to ascertain its copyright status. Quite likely post 1922. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The Battle of Bushy Run cropped.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Battle of Bushy Run cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

While clearly PD now in Canada, we simply don't know enough about the date of the art to determine the PD status in the US. Source: [1]. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments: The file is a crop of File:The Battle of Bushy Run.jpg. If we decide to delete the crop, probably the original needs to be deleted too. --BorgQueen (talk) 08:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - nominated there, with a link here. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tag as {{PD-Canada}} and move to Commons. Add {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} if you sincerely believe that it may be copyrighted in the US. Clearly stated to be PD in Canada here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Battle of Bushy Run.jpg has been reopened. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kazem HajirAzad in End of Game- 2010 - photo by Naser Sajadi Hoseini.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazem HajirAzad in End of Game- 2010 - photo by Naser Sajadi Hoseini.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

License tag claims uploader created the photo but Summary claims it is by Naser Sajadi Hoseini Eeekster (talk) 09:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sanaa Gamil.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanaa Gamil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a color shifted version of the photo at http://www.fanoos.com/society/sanaa_gamil.html Eeekster (talk) 09:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abigail_Keats_Autumn_winter_2010_1.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: OTRS received; image now properly licensed.. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abigail Keats Autumn winter 2010 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Fashion shot - More information needed to confirm is 'self' as claimed by uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abigail_Keats_Autumn_winter_2010_2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: OTRS received; image now properly licensed.. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abigail Keats Autumn winter 2010 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Fashion shot - More information needed to confirm 'self' claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Abigail_Keats_Autumn_winter_2010_3.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: OTRS received; image now properly licensed.. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abigail Keats Autumn winter 2010 3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Fashion shot - More infomation needed to support 'self' claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Player_logo_4c_web.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Player logo 4c web.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo - More information needed to support a 'self' claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tyrannitron.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tyrannitron.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Skydive-g1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skydive-g1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jetstorm-ultra.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jetstorm-ultra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Soundwave-g2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soundwave-g2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:200500markfront.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:200500markfront.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Currency - Not sure this can be claimed as license given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:200500markfront1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:200500markfront1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Currency - Not sure it can be claimed under license shown Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Overproof.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Overproof.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Album cover - More information needed to support 'self' claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zul F.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zul F.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Described as a promotional shot so unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OneTwoThreePNC.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:OneTwoThreePNC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the exact source cannot be determined. The EXIF data states that the image was taken by a DSC-H2, which is a professional-style camera. This is a web-resolution and professional-style composition. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EQTPLaza.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EQTPLaza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the exact source cannot be determined. The EXIF data states that the image was taken by a DSC-H2, which is a professional-style camera. This is a web-resolution and professional-style composition. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kclock.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kclock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Highly likely to be a copyright violation, but the exact source cannot be determined. This is a web-resolution and professional-style composition. The EXIF data states that the image was manipulated by Adobe Photoshop, which is not known to be used by the uploader. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ppu7.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ppu7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image was uploaded with description of "byppu," which indicates that the image was taken from Point Park University's website. No EXIF data. Web-resolution. Uploader is a prolific copyright violator and had been blocked. See the carnage at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. GrapedApe (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Brushguard-cybertron.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brushguard-cybertron.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RVPuramImage12.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVPuramImage12.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Seems to be cropped from an image at [2]. —Bkell (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RVPuramImage04.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVPuramImage04.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

TinEye and Google return several higher-resolution versions of this image: [3], [4], and [5]. There are also two results for a 480×381 image from santaclaradog.org which are dead links now ([6] and [7], with the image itself at [8]), but the Internet Archive provides [9] and [10], which identify this dog as "K-9 'Marco', a German Shepherd, who works as a police dog for the San Jose Police Department." —Bkell (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RVPuramImage03.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVPuramImage03.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Probably copied from [11] (from the gallery at [12]). —Bkell (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RVPuramImage05.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVPuramImage05.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Probably copied from [13]. —Bkell (talk) 22:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RVPuramImage06.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVPuramImage06.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possibly copied from [14]. —Bkell (talk) 22:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RVPuramImage09.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RVPuramImage09.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Probably cropped from [15], from the gallery at [16]. —Bkell (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:E Sampathkumar.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:E Sampathkumar.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Probably copied from [17]. —Bkell (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.