Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 12[edit]
File:Gruntgame1.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY (TALK) 01:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gruntgame1.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears that the copyright owner is Grunt board game. Sumanch (talk) 03:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Shin packet.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shin packet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging. Acather96 (talk) 08:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:KIMT Storm Team 3.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KIMT Storm Team 3.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I have searched the entire website for KIMT-TV (the television station associated with this image) and haven't found this image on that site. The user who uploaded this image claims he is the copyright holder (he released it under CC-BY-SA 3.0). If this was an actual image from KIMT-TV, he could not release it via CC. I feel this image was created by the user and not by the television station itself and as such should be deleted. Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 13:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:MaggiBoerewors Kitsnoedels 20100605.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:CupNoodle.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CupNoodle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of products/packaging Acather96 (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: How is a photo of a product an "unauthorized derivative work"? This clearly qualifies as "fair use". The nominators other nominations seem similarly mistaken. 66.159.220.134 (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- But the files are not claimed under fair use, they all use a free license tag (i.e. they claim that the file is in the public domain, or under a Creative Commons/GFDL license), when actually they are of copyrighted artwork/design. If a claim of fair use was made with an accompanying fair use rationale which explained how the file and it's use met Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, then the deletion rationale would be negated and the image could be kept. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:SOFIXIT. 66.159.220.134 (talk) 07:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- But the files are not claimed under fair use, they all use a free license tag (i.e. they claim that the file is in the public domain, or under a Creative Commons/GFDL license), when actually they are of copyrighted artwork/design. If a claim of fair use was made with an accompanying fair use rationale which explained how the file and it's use met Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, then the deletion rationale would be negated and the image could be kept. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The splash on the left cup might be copyrightable. Replace with (for example) the cup which was deemed to lack originality according to the Tokyo High Court. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:HEDGEHOG CRISPS.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HEDGEHOG CRISPS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:McCoys Crisps.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:McCoys Crisps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Boost-old-new.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Boost-old-new.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of products/packaging Acather96 (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Cornetto box.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cornetto box.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 14:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Chimpmunkey.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chimpmunkey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of toy/product/mascot Acather96 (talk) 14:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What exactly is the contention here? As far as I am aware photos of an object do not constitute derivative works. If the subject of the photo were, for example, a painting then yes, it would be a derivative work, since it would essentially an unauthorised duplicate of the painting. A photo of a 3D item however is in no way equivalent to the item itself. There may be a case to be made concerning the logo on the t-shirt, since, like the painting example, it is 2D, but that aside it is perfectly legal (AFAIK) to photograph of an object. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Moonkey.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Moonkey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/toy/mascot Acather96 (talk) 14:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Comfort Fabric Conditioner 750ml Blue - Professional (Medium).jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Comfort Fabric Conditioner 750ml Blue - Professional (Medium).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2012+February+12%23File%3AComfort+Fabric+Conditioner+750ml+Blue+-+Professional+%28Medium%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 14:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Golden gaytime box.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Golden gaytime box.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging Acather96 (talk) 14:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:ManualCrown06-05-26b.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ManualCrown06-05-26b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image source: [1] According to Wikipedia, "this is a photograph taken by a member of the Kudzu Coalition who allows it to be freely distributed without restrictions". Unfortunately, there is no OTRS number and I can't find any statement about this at the source web site (this page only says "All rights reserved"). Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![[1]](http://kokudzu.com/images/manualcrown06-05-26b.jpg){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Falkorvisit.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Falkorvisit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:COM:FOP#Germany: freedom of panorama only appears at publicly accessible places (accessing a film studio probably requires special permission) and only applies outdoors as far as I understand. Besides, the thing here is unlikely there for permanent display. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mehdihuseyn.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mehdihuseyn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mixaylo.JPG (a different photo of the same statue). Stefan2 (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Old Boy's hostel.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Old Boy's hostel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Says "taken by friends" which conflicts with the license claim. Eeekster (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:BoysHostel.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BoysHostel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Says "Taken By Friends" which conflicts with the license claim. Eeekster (talk) 22:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Lee Nguyen.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lee Nguyen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.