Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 9
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Warmia.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prussian tribes map.png. Note that this only applies to the November 2005 revision of the image. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:World-press-2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Deleted as a derivative work on Commons and should probably also be deleted here. See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:World-press-2008.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Normal 0005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The description suggests that this is a copyvio. Stefan2 (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The uploader indicated in his upload summary that he doesn't understand our copyright requirements so I've let him know that, since it's a screenshot from a copyrighted television program, copyright is owned by the studio, not by whoever grabbed it and posted it to http://www.castle-fans.org, which is where he got the image. The license is definitely invalid. It should be {{Non-free television screenshot}} --AussieLegend (talk) 20:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that this is ineligible for copyright. Since it is from 1933, it might be out of copyright for some other reason, though. Stefan2 (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Slavechains.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The photo looks recent (for example because it is in colour) so the pre-1923 statement might be wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 00:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oriental Dragon 2012C.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per Commons:COM:FOP#United States. It is placed at Kensico Cemetery which opened after 1977 so this item was likely made after 1977. Stefan2 (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shahrdari Bushehr.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- City's logo is not likely to be owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jalale Ale Ahmad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source conflicts with license claim. Uploader has a history of grabbing image from Panoramio. Eeekster (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Azadegan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source conflicts with license claim. Eeekster (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY (TALK) 00:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Elailineendunge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- CD cover with no evidence the uploader owns the rights. Eeekster (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Source clearly contains a different image, may be a mistake? ZZArch talk to me 09:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WuhanLecLiHongzhi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the image is licensed under GFDL. ZZArch talk to me 09:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems that the licence only applies to the {{PD-ineligible}} task of scanning the image and not to the image itself. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The image was drawn by Betty Withy, my mother-in-Law, and photographed by me for inclusion in the article about her (deceased) husband. Original copyright resides with her as the artist and is freely given.andyjohnw
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Chairmanpcb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Posioslogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MGpadma2aa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Doubtful copyright status, uploader is a serial violator and this image looks, quite frankly, a bit dodgy. Lack of EXIF, nomination made as part of this CCI. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MGR- Pope.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per the uploaders own admission (here), he was born in 1978, and this photo was taken in 1986. Therefore I am doubtful about the copyright status of this image, namely his PD-self claim - uploader is a serial violator and nomination is made as part of this CCI. Acather96 (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MGRPposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per the uploaders own admission (here), he was born in 1978, and this photo was taken in 1976. Therefore I am doubtful about the copyright status of this image, namely his PD-self claim - uploader is a serial violator and nomination is made as part of this CCI. Acather96 (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MGRwchakname2222a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- While no date is given this looks like an old photograph (going by the poor quality and b/w picture), doubtful copyright status per my reasoning above. Uploader is a serial copyright violator and the nomination is made as part of this CCI. Lack of description makes this unencyclopedic and the file is also orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:P3kanna3R.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per the uploaders own admission (here), he was born in 1978, and this photo was taken probably around 1981 (the subjects year of death, and as this is a funeral picture it figures). Therefore I am doubtful about the copyright status of this image, namely his PD-self claim - uploader is a serial violator and nomination is made as part of this CCI. Acather96 (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kannadasan.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Author differs from uploader, source is given as 'Author'. Tagged non-self gfdl, but no evidence of permission and there is a lack of clarity over who the author of the work actually is. Acather96 (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MGR45kar5a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- While no date is given this looks like an old photograph (going by the poor quality and b/w picture), doubtful copyright status per my reasoning above. Uploader is a serial copyright violator and the nomination is made as part of this CCI. Lack of description makes this unencyclopedic and the file is also orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.