User talk:D4n2016

Teahouse

If you have any question about editing, please refer to Wikipedia:Five pillars or Wikipedia:Teahouse.Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

D4n2016

Thank you! :)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Android Jetpack (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Home Lander was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Android Jetpack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Android Jetpack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Home Lander (talk) 03:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, D4n2016! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Home Lander (talk) 03:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hans Schulz

Hi D4n2016, according to MOS:DABPIPE, piping should not be used on disambiguation pages except to add things like italics. I prefer to use the redirect that was there before, but I changed it to a MOS:DABMENTION. If you don't like this version let me know and we can work it out. Leschnei (talk) 13:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,809 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Firefox Rapid Release Model

Hello D4n2016, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Firefox Rapid Release Model, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefox Rapid Release Model.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Clearfrienda ^💬 23:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Clearfrienda: Thanks for your message. I added information to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefox Rapid Release Model on what would happen/what is important if the article would be deleted. Please be aware of that we have to transfer that important information before deletion. --D4n2016 (talk) 01:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Some concerns regarding your "AI-generated" templates

Hello, I'm Kinsio. I'd like to share some concerns regarding the contents of the "AI-generated" series of maintenance templates you've created in your userspace.

First of all, I've reviewed some of your contribution history and noticed that you've already attempted to use these templates in articles directly. This is not an appropriate use of userspace. Templates for use in the article namespace should be created in the Template namespace. However, the greater concern is that based on their content, these templates have no reason to exist in the first place and have some worrying implications about your contributions. My specific concerns are as follows:

• Regarding User:D4n2016/Template:AI-generated-GPT-4-checked: If you, as the creator of a page, feel the need to add a warning that the page may still include false information or fake references, the only reasonable conclusion is that the text was not, in fact, thoroughly checked by its author upon creation. You should never add information that you suspect is false or references that you have not personally checked to a Wikipedia article. I encourage you to actually read the essay linked to by {{AI-generated}} and your templates derived from it for some tips about how to responsibly use LLMs in your contributions.
• Regarding User:D4n2016/Template:AI-generated-GPT-3.5: If an article is indeed very unlikely to include false information or fake references, there's no reason for the article to have a maintenance tag on it. Either you suspect an issue (in which case, again, you should check on that before you submit your edit!) or you don't. If you'd simply like to disclose that your edit was written with the assistance of a LLM, you should do so in the edit summary.
• Regarding User:D4n2016/Template:AI-generated-GPT-4-minimal: There's no reason to add a message to a page that it has been visited by many readers. If that's supposed to support the claim that the page is unlikely to include false information or fake references, it's a non sequitur. There are many Wikipedia articles that have been visited by many readers and yet still have issues. And even regardless, again, there's no need for a maintenance tag to specify the strength of conviction of the tagger that there's an issue. The purpose of a maintenance tag is to enlist the help of other editors who may be better positioned to address the issue, not to reassure the reader that "everything's probably fine, though".

In summary, please refrain from making edits generated using a LLM in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, even if you intend to fix them later. Do not add content without citing a reliable source. Be bold and review LLM output yourself before adding it to a Wikipedia article; it's not fair to other editors to expect them to clean it up for you. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, and if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kinsio (talk ★ contribs) 21:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Move of BGM-109 Tomahawk

It's done now, and I don't have the energy or interest level to go back and contest this, but I really wish you hadn't moved this without a prior discussion. The problem with this move is that there are several versions of the Tomahawk missile, and quite a few of them are not BGM-109 designations; for instance all of the submarine-launched Tomahawks are UGM-109's; the surface-launched naval variant RGM-109E's are as far as I'm aware still in active service, the BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missile isn't even included as it's got it's own separate article, etc. Moving this all to the BGM-109 designation article title both fragments the searchability, and doesn't align with MOS:PRECISION and WP:AT. Would you consider either moving it back, or moving it a second time to Tomahawk (missile family) similar to how we treat other large families of missiles that don't merit individual articles per type (like Aster (missile family), Hisar (missile family), CAMM (missile family), etc.)⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 21:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the message! D4n2016 (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response! ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hi D4n2016! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 21:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh ok. But you agree that the 1971 film is better than the 2005 film, right? - Dan