Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Dr Jackson is not rweal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Dr Jackson is not rweal!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Thanks

[edit]
)

Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Elf (film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Someone, i guess(talk i guess|le edit list) 00:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Angel Aquino. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. CSMention269 (talk) 03:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there was a spelling error. You don't have a capital letter after a comma Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But it doesn't make sense I need a administrator

[edit]

To settle this Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 01:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

to settle... what?
Also, while I have your attention: if you want to add a new SCP to the article, it needs an external source - i.e., not the SCP Wiki itself. DS (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Different article Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SCP Foundation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 02:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heres the thing followchain is reliable source i fact checked it myself Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I misclicked when reverting another instance of vandalism on my diff browser. I undid myself, followchain should work, it's all good. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 02:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, no. Ask on WP:RS/Noticeboard. DS (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay I forgive :)

[edit]

Good luck Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

to chaotic envy forgiveness letter Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Breeeee

[edit]

Whale Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minnow Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Trout me Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bruh trout me Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to add userboxes

[edit]

pls help Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 06:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:USERBOX. Next time, ask for help at WP:HD, your user talk page isn't a very visible page. Janhrach (talk) 10:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thx Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 05:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Gray"

[edit]

On several occasions, such as this, you removed a non-breaking space, which displays as a gray space in the visual editor. Please read MOS:NBSP and revert all your edits in which you erroneously removed NBSP. Janhrach (talk) 10:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will try Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 05:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wait

[edit]

M3me Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Dr Jackson is not rweal! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
if anyone needs me I will be awake at 10:00 AM eastern time Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 02:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Jackson is not rweal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here i have made multiple contributions to wikipedia and liily is cool asked for userboxes not directly to me but she asked for userboxesDr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Jackson is not rweal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)i was blocked because of not here to build a encyclopedia and some unconstructive edits I will not disrupt wikipedia anymore and i will only make constructive edits[reply]

Decline reason:

That's a little too generic for an unblock. Could you explain what conduct got you blocked? What constructive edits will you make, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 15:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Jackson is not rweal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here i was blocked because of not here to build a encyclopedia in different articles and talk pages examples are in my filter log, I will not disrupt wikipedia anymore and i will only make constructive edits like using appropriate citations, expaning short articles, copyediting, and linking artles.etcDr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 15:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Concur with Bbb23 below - your response indicates you have no intention of making a serious request. Voice of Clam (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What sort of edits do you intend to make if unblocked? Please be specific. SQLQuery Me! 14:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dr Jackson is not rweal yes I did — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Jackson is not rweal (talkcontribs) 00:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know whether your "response" is trolling, incompetence, disruption or some combination, but you're wasting our time with your nonsense. TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]