User talk:Ixudi

Welcome!

Hello, Ixudi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khuda Bakhsh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:10, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ixudi! Your additions to Shad Azimabadi have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Ali Ibrahim Khan, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maulana Mazharul Haque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sake Dean Mahomed

Can you please stop vandalising my history of a famous figure. Trying to change the history from hiding his ethnic and his identity. He is bengali. Bengal213x (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typos

Please note that some of your edits such as this which you marked as copyedits introduced a lot of typos into the article which I had to revert. Mellk (talk) 04:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was using a typing assistant for some of those articles. Will refrain from using it going forward as it seems to be causing more problems. Ixudi (talk) 09:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your Recent revert in Purbiya (soldiers)

The Term 'British Bengali Army' is usually used to represent The Bengali Army Raised During The British Rule , There's Nothing Confusing about this. We can't always Copy Paste from the Sources and the grammatical errors are minimal , I also added a bit more Sourced info on the Topic which also went in Vain , if you keep reverting Edits from new editors how would one learn . i would request you to undo your revert and Let me know the errors here so that i could Rectify them. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 10:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be undoing the revert. If you wish to discuss the merits of the term “British Bengali Army”, then please do so on the article talk page and please be aware that a reliable source will be needed. The grammatical errors you added are also not helpful to the article. Even in this reply, you seem to have issues with capitalising different words. I suggest editing Wikipedia in your own native language first to get a better understanding of the default manual of style. Ixudi (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for alerting me to the errors. I will make sure to avoid the faults you pointed out while adding the information I wanted from sources, and if there are any issues, please let me know so I can fix them. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to make the same errors and you are also altering direct quotes such as the quote from Brigadier Troup. I would advise you to refrain from editing that article until you understand how Wikipedia works or I will need to escalate this. Editing direct quotes is not acceptable and it is frankly concerning that you don’t know this. Ixudi (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Man I will Not edit this article anymore , you are accusing me of disruptive editing which i never wanted to do , I am Sorry for your extra efforts to counter my unwanted Disruption. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating article about Bhanudatta Misra, Nice work!. Dcotos (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, really appreciate it! Ixudi (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Simroungarh

How do you say that half of medieval city of Simroungarh lies in India? Simroungarh has a distinct boundary wall. The southern wall is part of Indo-Nepal boundary. This way, all of Simroungarh today is part of Nepal. Scyfie (talk) 10:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. Archaeological investigations detail that parts of Simraungadh fell within Bihar, India. Please refer to the aracheological investigations and do not make unsourced claims:

https://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ancientnepal/pdf/ancient_nepal_126-127_01.pdf

Page 2: "On the south side of the fortress the international boundary between India and Nepal runs along the main inner wall and parts of the earthen walls remain in Indian territory". Ixudi (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abhayakaragupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buddhaguhya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PadFoot (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ixudi. Thank you for your work on Relic Stupa of Vaishali. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start!, but Stupa name is "Buddha relic stupa" in sources!, please check. https://www.telegraphindia.com/bihar/ancient-stupa-in-a-shambles-neglect-agony-for-5th-century-buddha-relic-in-vaishali/cid/316714

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 12:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ixudi. Thank you for your work on Vanaratna. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Topic on Padmasambhava

Please stop reverting sourced corrections to Padmasambhava. It appears that you are supporting fictional narratives and edit warring. Bring it to talk. Metokpema (talk) 16:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, You refused. You didn't bother to answer this note on your own talk page, but went for another revert. That's hostile behaviour. I see you've been cited already for edit warring, and you're doing it again after I opened the talk topic to stop your edit warring.

I read the Padmasambhava page a few years ago, when it was well written and sourced. The lede and following paragraphs are now embarrassing for an encyclopedia, and contradict unerased facts further into the page as if those facts haven't been deleted yet. It's now junk.

Your notes on reverting my corrections are not factual, another technique of edit warring. First you complained on the 'serious changes' now its deleted sources. No sources were deleted.

van Schait is still a source, but his scholarship is questionable. His fantasy of Padmasambhava being asked to leave Tibet is unsupported by any research I have read, and I have read a lot. His POV is hostile as is the POV of the editor who wrote the lede and following paragraphs. He's the latest Chinese go-to for disinformation cloaked as scholarship.

Your reverts are supporting hostile POVs and fantasy narratives. Why? For whom?

It's clear your depth of scholarly knowledge of Tibet's history and Tibetan Buddhism is shallow. To grasp onto incorrect information so much so that you're edit warring suggests more than just shallow understanding. What's going on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metokpema (talk • contribs) 17:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's not really much to discuss at this point. You are removing longstanding sourced content without discussing. You are also engaging in sockpuppetry and a case has been raised against you to that effect here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Metokpema. Ixudi (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say all their edits are wrong but some of them are based on fringe views, such as this [1]. Vacosea (talk) 06:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]