User talk:Jay Kenechukwu

May 2023

Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ibru Organization have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Michael Ibru. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oskar Ibru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oskar Ibru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lakwat (talk) 12:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jay Kenechukwu. Thank you for your work on Oskar Ibru. User:Timothytyy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please spend some time to expand it. Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Timothytyy}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Timothytyy (talk) 13:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I will keep working on it. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 13:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon Timothy!! Please help me create subsections (background and education, career, philanthropy and personal life) on the Oskar Ibru page. Don't know how to do that yet.

Thanks. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jay Kenechukwu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a conflict of interest or external relationship with the people I have written about. Everything I put up on those Wikipedia pages are sourced from independent news outlets...unless you are implying these outlets are conflicted or maintain a relationship with the subjects. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 20:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kemi Ibru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kemi Ibru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://africanpf.org/speakers/kemi-dasilva-ibru/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to bother to Contest this. A renowned physician that has been profiled by Forbes, CNN, CNBC, etc for her works doesn't deserve a Wikipedia biography page? But the likes of Bob risky and Jay boogie do? I think it's now evident that Wikipedia is merely a popularity Contest.

Goodluck!! Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I now understand the reason given for the speedy deletion nomination. Copyright infringement. Fair enough. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emmanuel Ibru

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emmanuel Ibru, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmanuel Ibru (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Emmanuel Ibru instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. Please compare and combine the draft and the article.

You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emmanuel Ibru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jay Kenechukwu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Emmanuel Ibru

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Emmanuel Ibru, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emmanuel Ibru for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmanuel Ibru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Ibru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been reviewed and it eminently qualifies (as I was notified by the user DreamRimmer). This is the second time you've nominated this article for deletion yet it's passed review both times.

Give it a rest, thank you. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 07:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the AfD template from the page as it is not advisable. Instead, discuss on the AfD page why you think the page should not be deleted. I am suspecting a WP:COI and WP:UPE here and your attitude towards that particular article is suspicious. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no conflict of interest here. Everything stated on the article is publicly verifiable from reputable media sources. The man is a notable businessman in Nigeria from an established well known family.

Other users have reviewed this article and found it was qualified for Wikipedia. It seems you have a personal problem with the subject. It is your attitude that is suspicious. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 08:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason DreamRimmer marked it as reviewed is because it has been nominated for deletion and that is normal. Argument here is not necessary at all, I'd advise you go to the AfD and present your argument I'm only judging based on my understanding of the inclusion guidelines here. Regards, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the user (A.B and DreamRimmer) have both countered your AFD nominations yet you've been adamant about it. It is your attitude that is suspicious not mine.

I cited every publicly available information from reputable sources on the subject. The subject qualifies for a Wikipedia biography page. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've marked it as reviewed to remove it from the New Pages queue. Currently, the community is discussing its notability, and we'll wait for the consensus from the AfD discussion to decide what to do next. – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Understood. Thank you. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 08:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibru Organization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 08:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ibru family. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 14:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Ibru family and it's members are famous/notable/admired figures in Africa. And I study them same way I do other notable families in Nigeria. Every edit I have ever made has been accompanied by independent/verifiable citations from reputable sources. It's not my personal opinion.

So go ahead with your conflict of interest discussion. I honestly don't care.

Thank you. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 08:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to add that no one will police my area of interest or what I choose to edit on Wikipedia. Jay Kenechukwu (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jay Kenechukwu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]