User talk:Quaerens-veritatem

I often have other things to occupy my attention so may be unable to respond quickly to messages. For new messages please tap the blue “Add topic” tab above. I will reply on this page.

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Also see WP:MEDMOS for how to interpret and format a source. --Zefr (talk) 02:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Earth day!

Happy Earth Day!

Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of West Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
: Fixed

I screwed up big time & am so sorry about it!

To: Quaerens-veritatem - I made a huge screw up on the talk page of "Killing of Rayshard Brooks" and in doing so, I confused you - or I got you confused ... anyway, I am very sorry for my screw up. BetsyRMadison (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem BetsyRMadison. It's hard to be human. Best regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On The Image Issue

Following our conversation here & your reply, I’m really happy for you. It’s a great thing you got yours fixed, I’ve tried to follow every step you took in correcting yours but for some reason I keep getting stumbling blocks every which way, maybe it’s because I’m residing in Nigeria or perhaps the IPhones sold in Nigeria maybe different from the ones sold in Europe & North America all this just makes me want to move back to Utah. At least there i’d get Apple customer care representatives to interact with faster. Celestina007 (talk) 18:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Celestina007: I suppose the problem is either a software glitch/your phone lacking "Safari"->"Advanced"->"Experimental Features"->“Intersection Observer” that should be on your phone. I can't believe your phone is different except for the SIM card, the operating software should be the same. I suppose you called 0800 444 4261 (the number is for landlines; you may be charged when calling from your iPhone; and, the number may not be accessible from your network provider). You could try getting the "Apple Support" app that has a chat option. You could try Twitter (https://twitter.com/AppleSupport) and see if they can provide an answer or a phone/chat option from where you are. The best idea I have is you could try to make an international call to the U.S. by dialing the exit code for Nigeria (I think its "009" but you need to check this) + “1” or "001" (the U.S. country code) + 800-275-2273 (say “speak with the representative”)(I'm not sure, but you may be charged for the call). If you can't get Apple to fix the problem as I did, it will be a pain, but you could disable JavaScript ("Safari"->"Advanced"->toggle off "JavaScript") that corrected the problem on my device, or you could download and use the "Google Chrome" app for web surfing, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia editing that allows the images when I tried it. Best of luck. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again @Celestina007: - If you couldn't get an Apple fix for the software glitch, I understand the upcoming iPadOS 14 software update will let you set the default browser from Safari to Google Chrome (and other browsers) that doesn't gray out Wikipedia images. See, https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/22/21299342/apple-ipados14-default-apps-email-browser-choice-features-wwdc-2020. Best, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quaerens-veritatem, Ah! Thanks for looking out for me. I figured I’d just purchase an Android phone instead & use my iPhone for just listening to music. Generally speaking I think Android phones/devices give their owners little or no stress compared to Apple products. Celestina007 (talk) 08:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 Glad to help. You may be right about the stress, but I'm now used to Apple, have had few problems, like the features, and love that its security software is the best out there. Best wishes, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quaerens-veritatem, yeah no cap there! Apple does have the best security. Celestina007 (talk) 07:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guess whose images finally stopped graying and returned to normal after almost 6 months? Yap! You guessed right. My iPhone finally decided to fix itself today. Celestina007 05:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 Yea! Great to hear. Maybe a software update or cell provider fix. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 09:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. Thanks 7&6=thirteen! Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have a mirror on my wall (a gift from a client) bearing advice that reminds me of you: IN IUS VOCO SPURIUS! Pidgin Latin for, 'Sue the bastards.' Have a safe and happy Independence Day. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@7&6=thirteen: ㋛! From my wife and partners - a framed needlepoint w/roses I put on my book shelves for my clients that reads - illegitimi non carborundum - mock latin, roughly, "don't let the bastards get you down". Best to you and yours this 4th. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 00:25, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quaerens-veritatem Wikify. There is an article! Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Killing_of_Rayshard_Brooks#Reversion to Investigation and Charges July 05 2020

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Killing_of_Rayshard_Brooks#Reversion to Investigation and Charges July 05 2020. FirstPrimeOfApophis (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:11, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niche. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mel Fisher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AP. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Quaerens-veritatem,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. (Per WP:TYS, any editor may bestow membership upon any qualifying editor, so I boldly went ahead with it.)

Best regards, History DMZ ^{(talk)+(ping)} 20:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware, welcome the invitation, and appreciate your bestowing the membership. Thank you very much for thinking of me, History DMZ ! Best wishes, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Towery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killing of Ahmaud Arbery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
: Fixed

Tap to display image.

Hi, I noticed you’ve provided a solution to the new Wikipedia problem where mobile/tablet users have to tap on photos to display them. I however do not have intersection observer on my version of iOS, as I found out quite painfully after many hours of research. Would you be able to help me as I do not want to tap to display each image on my iPad. Thanks, 101.0.49.246 (talk) 12:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Johnnytest5[reply]

Hi @101.0.49.246: Unfortunately, the only fix I know of is to activate intersection observer. I am not sure why you have not updated the iPadOS but, if possible, update your iPad; however, if you have an old iPad you may be stuck with an earlier generation of the operating system because your iPad doesn't have the hardware that's necessary to run new operating systems, and the only solution I know of, unfortunately, is to buy a newer iPad or iPad Mini. Best of luck, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dagen McDowell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institutional Investor. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
: Fixed

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 07:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seton Hall University School of Law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABA. :(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

Edit-warring on Byron York

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I was the one being reverted and used the talk page before Snooganssnoogans posted the above notice. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC) I note for some reason Snooganssnoogans has changed its name to Thenightaway. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 07:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your recent editing history at Killing of Ahmaud Arbery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muboshgu As it turns out, actually I tried to incorporate other editors’ responses in subsequent edits, but gave up after three. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 22:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

H

H 2405:4803:C601:E900:3500:B8CD:5986:2F71 (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Thank you for contributing to the article Chris Cuomo. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 02:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Although I now realize the 'editor consensus' is the NY Post 'should never be used for information about a living person', the edit has been verified by others. I wonder if the NY Post should be reevaluated as it has been accurate, for example re: the Hunter Biden laptop.

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Daniel J. Morrell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearst. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

Standard ArbCom sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 02:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GMO and pesticide topics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

In addition to the discretionary sanctions described above the Arbitration Committee has also imposed a restriction which states that you cannot make more than one revert on the same page in the same 24 hour period on all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, agricultural biotechnology, or agricultural chemicals, broadly construed and subject to certain exemptions.

KoA (talk) 15:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Open Society Foundations

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/newsroom/george-soros-launches-global-network-to-transform-higher-education, which is not released under a compatible license. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed

NYLS updates

Hi Quaerens-veritatem, my name is Ariel. It's nice to meet you. I noticed that you've contributed to the New York Law School article, and thought you might be willing to take a look at my suggested updates that I've posted on the Talk page. Thanks for your time, Ariel at NYLS (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Arthur

Templates like that autogenerate maintenance categories to contain the pages that have that template on them (see, for example, Category:Uncategorized from February 2023, which groups together all pages that have had the {{uncategorized}} template added to them in February 2023.)

So your use of "update after 2002" template resulted in the automatic generation of a Category:Wikipedia articles in need of updating from February 2002 category, which in turn resulted in the automatic creation of a non-existent redlink for Category:Clean-up categories from February 2002 — but nothing is ever allowed to be left sitting in any redlinked categories at all, which means I had to either create that redlinked category or get it emptied out entirely so that there was nothing sitting in it at all. But the "update after" template isn't for what you used it for — it's for monitoring information that's current as of today, but may still need updating in the future (such as the provisional results of an election that happened yesterday), not for tracking overdue updates to information that's 20 years out of date, so it can only be used in cases where the "update after" date is still in the future and not in cases where it's already a couple of decades into the past — so I simply couldn't justify creating the missing category, and my only option was to make it go away. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat (1) Would “Update inline|date=February 2023|reason=result of litigation needed” be of any use? (2) Is there something dealing with overdue updates to information that's 20 years out of date? Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Yes, that would be fine, since the resulting maintenance category does exist so it wouldn't be causing any problems. (2) You can tag the top of the article with the {{Update}} template — there's documentation on how to use it on that page if you want to read up on it — but that goes at the top of the page rather than inline, although you have the option of adding a note on the talk page to clarify what information you consider outdated, and it's also dated for the current month rather than being backdated to when some information originally became outdated. Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hunter College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diversity. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

John Eastman page error

Hey Quaerens-veritatem

There's an error on your John Eastman Page, Second sentence...

John Charles Eastman (born 1960)[1] is an American lawyer who is the founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute, a conservative think tank.[2][3] He is a former professor and dean at the Chapman University School of Law.[4]

John Eastman isn't the current dean at the Chapman School of Law, and hasn't been a dean for more than a decade. There have been five deans of the law school since Eastman was dean from 2007 - 2010. The current dean is Paul Paton, KC, he was preceded by Marisa Cianciarulo, preceded by Matthew J. Parlow, preceded by Tom Campbell, preceded by Scott Howe, preceded by John C. Eastman.

Because of this, the sentence "He is a former professor and dean at the Chapman University School of Law" is misleading.

This link may have some bearing for your "Controversies" section as a useful citation. Ditto this CU Boulder page.

I trust this helps :)

ScreamingLordDutch (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ScreamingLordDutch. I would think “former” would be sufficient. For example, Jimmy Carter is a former president and he left office about 42 years ago. I’m not sure how relevant is the time period or that reader interest dictates a different wording. I think readers would view it as Merriam-Webster does under b: “of, relating to, or occurring in the past”. Maybe you want to show Chapman has an unusual turnover in deans, but that doesn’t seem to rate going into that on Eastman’s page. If you have a suggestion, I’ll be glad to see it with the understanding of my former viewpoint. The Denver Post article is interesting but I’m not sure it adds anything of note because it fails to disclose the content of the emails. Perhaps another publication will give sufficient detail to ascertain whether actionable content was emailed. I’m away from the article, but when I get back I’ll see if the Boulder info needs including. 🙂 Thanks, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 21:36, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Quaerens-veritatem, I think "former dean" would bring more clarity/accuracy here.

The ambiguity comes in the designation "former X" and "Y," not "former A" and "former B." Your Jimmy Carter example is on point here but for Eastman there's two claims: Professor AND Dean. He's definitely former both, as I can't see a current professorship or deanship anywhere–stand to be corrected on this–but I've had no joy so far.

I wonder if this intro text isn't just directly cribbed from his Twitter/X bio. Looks like identical wording, again, somewhat misleading.

The add from the Denver Post & CU bolder pieces is that he was Visiting Scholar in Conservative Thought and Policy for the 2020-21 academic year. I may have missed this in your original, my apologies if I have.

Appreciate you taking this up, particularly your time on this.

Best,

SLD ScreamingLordDutch (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ScreamingLordDutch. I’ve added ‘former’ to dean so it now reads former professor and former dean. Also, added his stint @ U. of Colorado under the Career section (it was so brief in time I didn’t think it needed to be in the lede). Glad to see your thoughts and information, and working with you on improvements. Best, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad for your help, insights, and working with you on this too. You take good care out there ;)

Best ScreamingLordDutch (talk) 13:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Eastman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.Bjørn Lomborgadded a link pointing to EAI, List of University of Georgia people added a link pointing to EAI (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Bjørn Lomborg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EAI. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Widener University Commonwealth Law School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief judge. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Keep up the good work! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😊 Thank you! David Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Athens, Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interim. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, in this case did mean Interim as “…a temporary state, and is often applied to transitional political entities” in this case a chief of police; however, perhaps Interim management is better, though usually applied to businesses.Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Quaerens-veritatem!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion on Temple University Beasley School of Law March 3 at 7:44AM

Curious on your reasoning for deletion on a notable alumni. Maybe possibly just an honest mistake...you're probably tasked with reviewing thousands of items in limited time frame. Surely, a federal administrative law judge in Social Security Admin in D.C. headquarters is indeed notable for a graduate anywhere. I don't think you realize how difficult it is to get that appointment and then confirmation, and just how notable that is in terms of legal accomplishments. Seriously, after reconsideration if you have even the slightest doubt I suggest you ask the Dean of the law school to verify the notability of the entry because the school itself monitors the webpage and had no objection. You might also call the president of the university to verify the importance and notability as well. Here's what bothersome since you took absolutely no action on other entries in the very same section that are clearly not notable or have no connection to legal education or law practice: a Comcast executive, an NBA sports agent, a radio talk host, a radio politics commentator, a member of city council, several PA state representatives (politicians), and a person listed as a "convicted felon and former state representative." I believe your deletion was without basis, and at this point I'm guessing it was just an honest mistake. Please feel free to call the Dean to verify the notability and importance of the entry as it relates to the school and the practice of law, and you're also invited to call the president of the university who will be able to clear up any misunderstandings. Thank you for your attention. Arkincongile (talk) 23:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arkincongile. Sorry, but as I noted in my edit, Mr. Roshko does not have WP:N. Just being appointed an administrative law judge does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the Wikipedia general notability guidelines. The dean of a law school or president of a university does not determine notability, Wikipedia standards do. There are approximately 1700 federal ALJs nationwide, and the Social Security Administration (SSA) employs about 1500 of them, the only requirements are being licensed and authorized to practice law and seven years of experience in litigation or administrative law as a licensed attorney, and they are not notable per se. See, Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges/Notability#Administrative law judges - “Judges who are hired by government agencies are not inherently notable, but holding such a position is evidence of notability that can be established by other strong indicia of notability (emphasis supplied). In particular, administrative law judges who serve for a comparatively long time, who preside over important cases, or whose opinions are often cited by higher courts, are highly likely to be notable.” Mr. Roshko only served three years (1998-2000) for the SSA. Even if those indices were otherwise met, Mr. Rothko must still meet WP:GNG requirements - Mr. Roshko obviously does not. Having one “sprout” mention in Ballotpedia is not “significant coverage” per WP:SIGCOV.

I hope my reply helps you understand Wikipedia notability guidelines. If you still argue that my edit was wrong, you should try WP:CONTENTDISPUTE. If you feel other alumni should have been deleted, feel free, but you must do so per Wikipedia guidelines and having a Wikipedia article for an alumnus (for example, Amy Banse) argues against this. By the way, if “the school itself monitors the webpage”, so long as there is no WP:COI problem, you might ask the school to provide or, perhaps, you could provide, the missing additional citations for verification as noted at the top of the Temple University Beasley School of Law page. Thank you for bringing forth you concern. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion on Steve Garvey Senate Primary Election

I just left a reply to your note on my User page. I've been editing on Wikipedia for 18 years and I've never remotely made a mistake like I did on the CA U.S. Senate primaries. Thanks for being so nice about it. Activist (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EMD SD70 series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Maine Railway. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Fixed[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deroy Murdock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USC. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed

Leonard Padilla

Why are you removing corrections from the Leonard Padilla page. I am a family member of his and his caretaker. He is no longer a public figure and it is painful for him and for everyone to have his personal information published on this page. Can you please just ket it go. 128f53d3035a20a1ca9e558447a607f8 (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

128f53d3035a20a1ca9e558447a607f8, you repeatedly removed sourced material. Article content is based on notability and reliable sources, not whether editors know the person individually.

Quaerens-veritatem: Can we please discuss this like civilized people? 128f53d3035a20a1ca9e558447a607f8 (talk) 06:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

128f53d3035a20a1ca9e558447a607f8, as I explained, you repeatedly removed sourced material. Article content is based on notability and reliable sources, not whether editors know the person individually or if there is negative or personal information so long as it is available and relevant. All the information is in the public domain and can be found without Wikipedia. I dare say many don't like some information in biographical articles, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a personal venue. The consensus of editors is that the article remains as is (subject to the addition of more relevant content), the page is protected by an administrator, you have been blocked from editing by another administrator, and if you continue to make disruptive edits, the block will be renewed. The editors and administrators are not being uncivilized, just following the rules for an entry. I trust that you will internalize the points I have made and move on to other matters. Regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But your own credentials on your user page don't have reliable sources. Some people are pathological liars and make stuff up.

It's not overly-audacious to point out you don't use consistent standards of evidence, while yet claiming to be have been a trial lawyer and assistant district attorney. In fact if you don't defend yourself from such obvious faults, you lower the prestige of such national offices and make the nation seem less reliable and harder to run. 2601:2C3:8681:6660:98B5:81A6:93D:1836 (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well 2601:2C3:8681:6660:98B5:81A6:93D:1836, you should reread my info - I was not an assistant district attorney, but a special assistant attorney general. Your diatribes are bizarre and I hope you get help. The result of your continual disruptive comments here and elsewhere is that you have been blocked from editing so I hope you internalize this as part of your rehabilitation. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 16:00, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About that ping

See [1]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gråbergs Gråa Sång. 😊 Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 09:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further discussion appeared at User_talk:Gråbergs_Gråa_Sång#Regarding_RSN. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Marc Warren. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar, just missed this when adding DoB with the template. Thanks, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Enjoy! and thank you. Best regards Denisarona (talk) 09:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Denisarona! Best regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]