Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 21

< December 20	December 22 >

December 21

File:Superhits.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Superhits.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wolfdog406 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Almanya-wupettall4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Almanya-wupettall4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mahsa sadeghi 85 (notify | contribs).

CV. The image is not self-made as claimed by the user. According to this website [1] (which has a link to the image), it was originally posted by [2] which has a copyright sign at the bottom of its main page. Vekoler (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SM City San Pablo Fences 5.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SM City San Pablo Fences 5.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Balubz (notify | contribs).

Blurry picture apparently taken from a moving vehicle; impossible to tell what is trying to be portrayed therein Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding additional images, same uploader, same reason: File:SM City San Pablo Fences 4.JPG File:SM City San Pablo Fences 3.JPG File:SM City San Pablo Fences 2.JPG File:SM City San Pablo Fences 1.JPG Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ggscf3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ggscf3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guru Gobind Singh Children's Foundation (notify | contribs).

Image not in use by any article, author does not wish to share the image any longer(says on file page) 173.33.181.66 (talk) 04:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ggscf2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ggscf2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guru Gobind Singh Children's Foundation (notify | contribs).

not in use by an article, author does not wish to share image (says on file page?) 173.33.181.66 (talk) 04:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ggscf1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ggscf1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Guru Gobind Singh Children's Foundation (notify | contribs).

not in use by an article, author no longer wishes to share image (says on file page?) 173.33.181.66 (talk) 04:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File name.ext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason for deletion just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ego-defence-mechanic (notify | contribs).

The photo is redundant now that it isn't linked to any article. Ego-defence-mechanic (talk) 06:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File nameCallum Baillie Emesis Photoshoot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:File nameCallum Baillie Emesis Photoshoot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ego-defence-mechanic (notify | contribs).

It is redundant now that it is no longer attached to any article. Ego-defence-mechanic (talk) 06:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Img 0985 6 7 a jpg h680.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Img 0985 6 7 a jpg h680.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 13:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An image is already used to describe this building. The image is also over manipulated, and this cannot be corrected by anybody other than the author. The image will eventually be deleted anyway when it's corrected counterpart is transferred to the commons. oneblackline (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Img 1062 3 4 jpg h680.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Img 1062 3 4 jpg h680.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 13:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The image is also over manipulated, and this cannot be corrected by anybody other than the author. The image will eventually be deleted anyway when it's corrected counterpart is transferred to the commons. oneblackline (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:East horndon petrol station.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:East horndon petrol station.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The image is also over manipulated, and this cannot be corrected by anybody other than the author. The image will eventually be deleted anyway when it's corrected counterpart is transferred to the commons. oneblackline (talk) 16:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elliots nightclub 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elliots nightclub 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The image is also over manipulated, and this cannot be corrected by anybody other than the author. The image will eventually be deleted anyway when it's corrected counterpart is transferred to the commons. oneblackline (talk) 16:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But the image is free and used in an article. Free and used images should not be deleted - find a better one to replace it - Peripitus (Talk) 05:14, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the attribution graphic; it's not clear whether we should believe the image is free, or it's copyright belongs to the author. And the image is over-manipulated, and keeping it is not going to change it, or change the manipulation which distracts from and overburdens the subject. oneblackline (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Img 8848 18x12 jpg w680.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Img 8848 18x12 jpg w680.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BenfleetClock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BenfleetClock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bluebellswood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bluebellswood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Peripitus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wattyler 2a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wattyler 2a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wattyler 1a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wattyler 1a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wattyler 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wattyler 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dabbishaw (notify | contribs).

Copyright attribution displayed in image. oneblackline (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the image is free and used. Watermarking is not a reason to delete as it can be fairly easily removed - Peripitus (Talk) 14:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ass Ponys.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ass Ponys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FotoPhest (notify | contribs).

WP:NFCC#1 states that "[n]on-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." Here we have a non-free picture of four living people posed in front of a shack doing nothing. This could be replaced by between one and four free pictures of living people posed doing nothing or something in a different location. They'd still be identifiable, and "identification" is the only coherent rationale offered for using this non-free content. This image is eminently replaceable as defined by NFCC#1 and should be deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is not about the individual members, but about the band, which no longer exists. Pictures of the individual members can still be taken, one at a time; but it is impossible to take a picture of the band as a band. That makes it the same as a person who is dead or who is never seen in public, where we presume that unless a free image can be found fair use may be made of an unfree image. -- Zsero (talk) 17:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unless I am rather mistaken this image is replaceable. According to the article the band made a release this year (Songs From A Checkered Past) - Still active and releasing. The people still exist. Someone could contact them and make an image. No harder that for any other group shot of people - Peripitus (Talk) 03:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Read it again. There's nothing in the article to indicate that the band is still active, and the album title shows that. -- Zsero (talk) 03:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - 2009 listing was not correct; I looked at the band's official site and the last stuff done was around the end of 2005. This, band as group doesn't exist any more. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Metaxasalexandrospapagospaulgeorge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metaxasalexandrospapagospaulgeorge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dr.K. (notify | contribs).

Unnecessary non-free image showing politicians meeting at war, copied from some copyright violating website, used just to make the point they've met. Damiens.rf 18:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What is the point of nominating all these images? This is a very rare photo showing the principal leaders of Greece in 1the period 1936-1940. Copyright is not infringed since it is not claimed as PD, so what is the point? Constantine ✍ 18:43, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dr. K's rationale.Argos'Dad 23:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFCC#2: reduces the marketability of the image for the copyright holder. And per WP:NFCC#8: used as article dressing. Copyright is infringed because it is being used without the permission of the copyright holder and doesn't meet fair use criteria. Correctly identifying the image's license doesn't ameliorate the need to abide by that license. — Bility (talk) 21:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:As per Dr K's rationale.Alexikoua (talk) 23:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tsolakoglou-jodl-ferrero-1941-04-23.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tsolakoglou-jodl-ferrero-1941-04-23.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cplakidas (notify | contribs).

Non-free picture showing politicians discussing a matter, used in three different articles, solely to make they point that these men discussed this matter. I'm not sure what the user looses in understanding of the articles by not seeing this specific image. Damiens.rf 18:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valuable historical documentary photo of an important event. Constantine ✍ 19:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Constantine's rationale.Argos'Dad 23:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFCC#2: reduces the marketability of the image for the copyright holder. And per WP:NFCC#8: used as article dressing. Also, the purpose of Wikipedia is not to provide a repository for important documents, but to create an encyclopedic article based on them. — Bility (talk) 21:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep historical photo of important event.Alexikoua (talk) 23:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.