Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 June 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 8
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WildcatsDesign.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pontsticill (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 05:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Witchwoodcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zekiw (notify | contribs | uploads).
- We don't need images of every one of the books; one (the first one) is enough. Having all of them fails WP:NFCC, specifically "significance" and "minimum use". –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this would probably be consistant with Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 23#7 other book covers, where relared images were kept. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Redaloes (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned file, target article was deleted via prod. — ξxplicit 05:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without delay if possible. It serves no purpose now. --Artene50 (talk) 08:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Worldmap2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daniel,levine (notify | contribs | uploads).
- As worded by 99.226.115.81, "Too harsh, missing content(thirteen colonies), and inaccurate content (Nepal)". Note that I have no opinion, this is merely a technical listing. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:XeTeX logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DarTar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphaned, superseded by .svg version Skier Dude (talk) 06:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Yinyangnofuzz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tekanu (notify | contribs | uploads).
- User:Tekanu was a sole purpose account that launched a "Tekanu microstate" nonsense/spam campaign. Their main article was speedy deleted as nonsense. This is a mop-up of the images left behind as part of that campaign. TwoMightyGodsPersuasionNecessity 18:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, plainly useless. Nyttend (talk) 17:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zaman album two.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Blytonite (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Alternate album cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Article already has a copyrighted album cover and this extra image, without sourced commentary on it, fails: NFCC#3 as excessive use and NFCC#8 in not significantly increasing reader's understanding. Image is simply decorative use of a copyrighted image - Peripitus (Talk) 12:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DSC00257.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Adhikarisushil (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned and wouldn't fit into any article in the encyclopedia. I would have moved this to Commons, but the user's only contributions was a test edit on his userpage and this upload about three years ago (presuming this is the user in question). I don't know if moving it there is the best idea, hence sending it here. –MuZemike 18:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It seems to be the only work by the uploader here too which is strange. --Artene50 (talk) 08:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, useless. Nyttend (talk) 17:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DSC00255.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Weisser83 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, redundant (and lower-quality) to File:Mausoleum of Habib Bourguiba.jpg on Commons (see other images on commons:Category:Bourguiba Mausoleum). –MuZemike 19:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is a borderline case. The image can be kept or deleted but it has legitimate metadata and good resolution. Its up to the closing Admin to decide...and is not an obvious copyvio. Just because its orpahned doesn't mean it should be deleted since this is not a fair use foto. --Artene50 (talk) 08:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Christopher columbus blond face and ships sch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sweetpoet (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Fails Wikipedia:NFCC #1, #3, #5, and #8. High resolution scan with little to no encyclopedic value that could easily be replaced (although I'm not sure we'd want to replace it as it plays a decorative role in the article). mgiganteus1 (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DSC00306.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Nineteen84 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, no description, and no encyclopedic usage as the image is so blurry. –MuZemike 21:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Adrian Denegar Signature.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Adrian Denegar Signature.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).
- Orphan Adenegar (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.