Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 10

< September 9	September 11 >

September 10

File:Raja Krishnamoorthi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EXIF says author is Peter Rossi. It appears to be a campaign photo by a professional photographer taken in 2009 with a Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II ($$$$$). It seems doubtful to me that the uploader is Peter Rossi. -- Dual Freq (talk) 01:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily delete as a copyvio of [1], as well as many other derivative works available on the web. (See tineye) -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 22:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Striking self per Diannaa. Didn't notice that. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 19:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the F9 speedy deletion. We've had the photo since 2009, so of course there will be copies all over the Internet. The particular example you list here is dated March 2016. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Heenan BenicaBoy .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 15#File:John_Heenan_BenicaBoy_.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sayer fight.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The file is already deprecated and replaced by File:Ward painting.jpg with an identified author. Deryck C. 16:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File lacking a source/author. Kelly ^hi! 07:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That image is not working for me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aylesbury WH.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 15#File:Aylesbury_WH.gif}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Strickland Goodall00.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 15#File:John_Strickland_Goodall00.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Catherine Sungyevo Stampnitzky.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 15:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused user photo. Kelly ^hi! 09:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused. Don't forget to delete the talkpage. Reh man 11:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cavalry-barracks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 18#File:Cavalry-barracks.jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cave Scene.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 15:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of non-free software? Kelly ^hi! 09:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Heath No 6 Stoke Garden Festival.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 15:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as own work, but image metadata says "Shelton - For All Our Yesterdays from Ray Withington" which indicates it may be from a feature in a British newspaper.[2] In another upload, editor said his name is "Michael Levey". Kelly ^hi! 09:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maccer, if you are later able to confirm authorship of this file, we can always restore it. For now, we don't know whether Withington took the photo and/or gave permission to use the given license czar 15:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:King Tom (cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. And really, no need for the condescension. czar 15:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, grainy - delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Obsoleted by File:King Tom near Dalmeny House (geograph 1694132).jpg and other files in Commons:Category:King Tom - Joseph Boehm. If desired in the future the two versions in this image's history are available as File:King Tom.jpg and File:King Tom (cropped).jpg. Kelly ^hi! 11:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'KeepIf User: Kelly had the brain cell of a gnat. She would notice that the statue in this image is in a different location to that of the other photograph of it. There are very good and historical reasons for the change of locations (some 600 miles apart) which may well one day make an interesting article. People like Kelly do immeasurable harm to this project. Giano (talk) 11:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly is now making bad faith edits to articles, in an attempt to say that files are 'unused' [3]. Giano (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No bad faith involved, I just believe the newer photo is of better quality. Of course that may be hard for me to determine with my gnat-brain! I've opened a discussion at Talk:Mentmore and Crafton Studs. Kelly ^hi! 12:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of the horse above its grave is far more suitable than the horse pictured in a random foreign landscape. Giano (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree now that the description has been updated. Withdrawn. Kelly ^hi! 13:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emr-icon64.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(1) If the uploader is the author, we need email verification of author permission (OTRS). (2) If "Richard Bushey" is the author, we need confirmation that the uploader is him. (3) EMR3 is GPLv2, but is the icon included in the repository and under the license? If no answers, delete. czar 15:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emr screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We need more information about this screenshot. Is it a GPLv2-eligible screenshot of EMR3? Or is it some other media copyrighted by ExcaliburWorld? And if the latter, where is their permission to publish under the stated license? "Richard Bushey" would not have rights as a screenshot-taker unless the composition was somehow original and copyrightable, which is often not the case with video games. czar 15:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CVG manuals.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a collage of copyrighted game artwork. Either convert to fair use (not sure I see a case) or delete as copyright violation. czar 16:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CV pinball circus marvels.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep only File:Cirqus Voltaire pinball.png, delete others Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This composition—artwork in a pinball machine—is protected by copyright and we have no evidence of creator permission to use the listed license czar 16:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, just to be clear, the problem is essentially with the license? That is, they might be okay if they were using the non-free 2-d/3-d art tag, plus non-free use rationales for each? If those were added, they seem like they'd meet WP:NFCCP. --tronvillain (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are two copyrights to consider: the photographer's and the original artist's (the photographer is making a derivative work of the artist who drew the image). If kept, we should continue to note that the photographer used a free license. If the plan is to keep the images as fair use, each would need a very specific rationale. If the purpose is to depict the subject, the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria requirements would allow one "overview" image for purposes of identification, but the other images would need to have some extenuating reason. For example, if sources discuss a specific visual aspect of the layout that cannot be explained in words. The short version is that there is likely only cause for keeping one of the images as fair use (File:Cirqus Voltaire pinball.png with appropriate rationale) and deleting the others. czar 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are there though? It's hard to see how Gregturn's photos would be considered transformative enough to be protected as derivative works, though I can see noting the license he wanted to use. And I think the other two images (of small but prominent sections of the pinball machine) really add to the text of the article - I wrote up a few fair use rationales. See what you think. --tronvillain (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tronvillain, yes, if you can distinguish the pinball artist's work, the artist automatically holds a copyright to that design by act of its creation. The photo is "derivative" of that artist's work/copyright. I think the FUR for the full machine as "visual identification" would be fine if the main infobox cover art didn't already exist for that purpose. The other FURs are superfluous—there isn't any sourced commentary that requires a non-free image to illustrate what cannot be depicted through words alone. (WP:NFCC#8) czar 11:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Cirqus Voltaire pinball.png and delete others. A full view of the pinball machine is good enough as secondary or primary image. The rest are not discussed by sources. I searched for sources but found nothing about C-I-R-Q-U-S or Ringmaster. --George Ho (talk) 06:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CXD9833GB.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:06, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not a useful/encyclopedic illustration at this close a crop czar 16:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Captured Hut.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ostensibly the uploader took this screenshot but does not have permission to use this license by the screenshotted assets' owner: the developer. czar 16:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shinya Arino (figurine).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:51, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Action figure: copyrighted depiction. Also ja:ファイル:Arino.jpg czar 16:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ship Simulator Professional

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: images were deleted but bot didn't close bundled nom czar 11:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Game copyright is owned by its creator and we need their permission to use the listed license. czar 16:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SM64glitch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic diagram. Unlikely to have any future use here or at Commons. Just removed from a blocked user's editnotice, which was its only use. czar 17:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Syrian National Democratic Alliance(logo).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 15#File:Syrian_National_Democratic_Alliance(logo).jpg}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sonic The Hedgehog.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fan art that doesn't deviate significantly from the copyrighted original czar 17:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sodaconstructor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of copyrighted interface without permission of developer/creator. Ostensibly the uploader made the creation on the screen but doesn't hold artistic rights to the interface. This is less obvious than my other noms on this page, so open to other opinions. czar 17:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change to fair use for contextual significance - this is the only image used on the relevant article. Deryck C. 17:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs FUR then, tagged for F6 czar 11:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supermariobrosznewlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Art for a fan game: unclear whether uploader has rights to release it under its current license, but quite clear that the image won't be a useful illustration for any articles in the near or long future. czar 17:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Degrees of degeneracy of different levels for a particle in a square box.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by a table, which is better suited for the purpose (see Degenerate energy levels#Particle in a square box). ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Supreme SuperGamer.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this software's license is correct, the description should link to a confirmation of such. The image is derived of many works, though: the icons and, most prominently, the dragon wallpaper. Is it released under this license? If not, delete. If the assets become sourced, use it in SuperGamer. czar 17:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WLG.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PNG duplicate of File:WLG2-1-1.svg. Both unused, but don't need to pull both to Commons as the SVG is higher in quality. czar 18:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neweegs.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry, low-quality illustration. Motherboard photo already supplies sufficient context in article. Quality too low to move to Commons as a useful future illustration. czar 18:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Light Sixer ID6.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader didn't put clear authorship info in their other files, but they share the same background and one uncropped file has EXIF data. However this photo stands out from the bunch as websized and not from the same background, so we would need more information here to prove that the uploader is the photo's copyright holder. czar 18:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Controller final.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted screenshot. If the screenshot was blanked out, the image would have no further purpose. Recommend delete. czar 18:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree - the caption shows that this photo is used to illustrate gameplay. The screenshot is thus an incidental inclusion, not the primary subject of the photo. Keep. Deryck C. 17:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gameplay almost always refers to the player's interaction with the graphics onscreen, not their interaction with the controller. But I could accept this image with the on-screen details scrambled (if it truly is de minimis). However, note also that the uploader is blocked and has a long history of file permission issues (see talk page). This image is in fact their only remaining upload after what appears to be over a dozen deletions. It's also web-sized and has no EXIF data, so I doubt its provenance as a personal image. czar 11:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not useful, but only because we have a better picture of the controller which appropriately free licence already, making this one offer no benefit to readers. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chexquest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of CD displaying copyrighted artwork. Current articles are already sufficiently illustrated. You can try adding a FUR here, but based on the article sourcing, a depiction of AOL's relationship with Chex can be adequately explained without a fair use image. czar 18:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CroppedPCpicture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, websized image by blocked user. Delete. czar 18:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darth Revan 2007.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to fair use or delete. Packaging and action figure are of copyrighted depiction. Star Wars has not been known to support free licensing. czar 18:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Derby3rdPartyCard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This card is derivative of a non-free photograph: delete czar 18:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FurcShot2008B.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Deryck C. 17:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC) relisted as Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_October_20#Furcadia_screenshots. Deryck C. 08:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because User:Sanct is a Furcadia developer, and had authorization to release it. GreenReaper (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FurcShot2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Deryck C. 17:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC) relisted as Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_October_20#Furcadia_screenshots. Deryck C. 08:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because User:Sanct is a Furcadia developer, and had authorization to release it. GreenReaper (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ECS password sheet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused here and no potential educational use for transfer to Commons. Image is low quality and just a list of passwords—if such a concept needed illustration, text is more sensible than an image. czar 19:23, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skinner dairy c. 1958-60.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Image scanned from an old color slide." Who is the author and who owns the copyright? czar 19:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gameking II.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear authorship. EXIF data doesn't match that of user's other uploads. czar 19:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hgm front-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Deryck Chan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear authorship. Websized and user has other troublesome uploads. Doesn't have same EXIF data as user's other photos. czar 19:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ICYBURGERKING.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other examples at iDog have fair use rationales, and this one would need one too, but I don't think a third illustration is warranted by the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria czar 19:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GenesisFirecore.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious authorship. File is websized, and a larger version is available online from a year prior: http://www.tupwrestlingforum.com/rereleased-consoles-revamped_topic10533.html czar 19:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghost Squad arcade machine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is derivative of copyrighted artwork: the title screen of the game, the artwork on its sides. If the artwork was covered up, there would be little use for the image. The arcade unit is already depicted in the article's infobox image. czar 19:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gravity Bone logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text logo, obsoleted by other free use assets: Gravity Bone czar 19:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hedgewarslogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, obsoleted by File:Hedgewars.svg at Commons czar 19:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mpconlogo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo czar 20:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ntsc-uk logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo czar 20:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Painting of QW Osborne.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appears (based on the bottom-left edge) to be a reproduction of a 2D work without rights holder's permission. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 20:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, photo is derivative of the artwork—needs email verification of author permission (OTRS) or deletion as copyright violation czar 20:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHWComicslogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, unconfirmed authorship/license, unlikely future educational use czar 20:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Playcrafter logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo, unlikely future educational use czar 20:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Splash logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, non-free duplicate of File:Splash Damage.svg, which already is in use and has a fair use rationale czar 20:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tibo Software company logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of non-notable company (Tibo Software was deleted). Current userspace use is a log of uploads, not a personal image. Would not be useful for transfer to Commons. czar 20:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XTX-IMG-XARMEX-ARvsXARMEX.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License looks okay at Flickr, but there is no confirmation of license for the image used within the illustration. czar 20:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IPhone 5s comparison.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (screens) FASTILY 22:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the trademarked logos on the top of the devices, but I completely forgot about the screen images! Looks like a Delete from here. -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 22:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.