Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 February 9

< February 8	February 10 >

February 9

File:IAS Newsletter.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence the uploader owns the copyright to this newsletter. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ice Mountain jk.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of copyrighted packaging. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ICookFruitWatercolorWEB.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that original artwork is in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IIITM Infotsav07.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also needs permission from the author of the pictured presentation. Copyright issues aside, the photo is of low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IIT Kanpur Finatics.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also needs permission from the designer of the banner. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ilkhanat-Lauwe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a screenshot of a website. A copyright notice can be seen near the bottom-left corner of the map. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image of childhood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a photograph of a printed publication. Copyright issues aside, the image is of low quality and is not used anywhere. It is not clear who this person is and why he is notable. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looking at this old revision, it's a photo of the uploader as a child. If this were a regular editor I'd be inclined to make allowances, but as it stands this appears to fall under "misuse of Wikipedia as a web host". ‑ Iridescent 07:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-Kalady Kannan Temple.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a scan of a postcard. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Img 1776 castlevania.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Permission" field indicates that the image is not freely licensed. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Incheon airport welcome.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South Korea has no freedom of panorama. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martin Wirtz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Martin Wirtz.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pictures of Matchstick Men CVB.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image de-PRODded due to Camper Van Beethoven's (CVB) version of Pictures of Matchstick Men being "notable". However, a cover's (non-)notability is irrelevant to the cover art's (in)ability to be contextually significant to the song, originally sung by English band Status Quo. As-is, the CVB version performed in only one rock chart, and the info about the version is blended into the section about other versions. Either the text can easily convey info about the version and other versions of the song, or critical commentary is insufficient to support the cover art. George Ho (talk) 03:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe Jackson - You Can't Get What You Want (Till You Know What You Want).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close/not actionable. Open for a couple weeks with no comments. Please direct specific source/copyright questions to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks, FASTILY 01:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This cover art, used for American and British singles, contains just plain black background, red text for the song title, and big white text for singer's name. The typeface looks unoriginal and simple. It's ineligible for US copyright. A&M Records, an American company, distributed the single. However, I'm unsure whether the cover art is the British or American work. The UK law can copyright a logo with very minimal amount of creativity. However, I'm unsure whether the cover meets the UK threshold. George Ho (talk) 09:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeLikeOthers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Longstanding screenshot of an individual de-PRODded under assumption that a screenshot is "acceptable for use in Template:Infobox film". Rather than immediately list it here after the de-PRODded, I searched for a suitable cover or a poster. I thought an image seen in an organization's website looked like a poster, but when I looked closely, I figured it turned to be a screenshot of a defunct official website. So I settled for one found in Amazon Prime US website instead.

Meanwhile, I looked up WP:FILMPOSTER and WP:FILMNFI and found no instructions about a screenshot that isn't of a title card. It all comes down to its compliance with WP:NFCC#8. However, I still remain unconvinced that an image of an individual, even as part of an actual film, helps readers convey the film, but I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Naurubwiema.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Peter Breiner and the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra version, which is copyright Naxos of America. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaoGKvMnxAg. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AEW Women's World Championship.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined a speedy deletion request, but I'm totally unconvinced it's a legitimate case of fair use. It can't reasonably be argued that one needs to see the actual belt/trophy to understand the concept of "championship", and even if that were the case it should be possible to source a free-use image of it. ‑ Iridescent 18:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.