Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 January 28

< January 27	January 29 >

January 28

File:Heritage Malta Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This logo has been replaced by File:Heritage Malta Logo new.jpg and is therefore no longer necessary. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miso soup packet.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work, permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marta 096.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work, permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coxford Singlish Dictionary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file is the cover of Coxford Singlish Dictionary, which is currently used on the articles of Singlish, Singlish vocabulary and TalkingCock.com.

For the usages on "Singlish" and "Singlish vocabulary", it it clear that their key purpose is to discuss on the characteristics and words of Singlish, and the file's application is purely a replaceable illustration that does not provide much contextual significance other than raising the point that "there exists a Singlish dictionary called Coxford Singlish Dictionary", and even that point can be clearly conveyed by pure text. The file's application on these articles violates WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8.

For the usage on "TalkingCock.com", one should remember that the article's main focus is the website itself. The fact that the website hosts that book doesn't make the cover of the book eligible for fair use on that article, as the book's inclusion is still incidental to the website. One may also compare with the legitimate case where the screenshot is fair used on the article. In such case the file fails NFCC 8.

As a result, the file should therefore be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Other Ocean Interactive logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to non-free -FASTILY 02:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly above the ToO as the fish isn't a simple geometric shape. Putting it here for discussion as it is a borderline case. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 01:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.