User:Relyimah/Dashboard
Menu: User Page | Talk Page (+) | Sandbox | Reference | Subpages | Contributions (alt) | Dashboard
This page is optimised for Mozilla Firefox and a screen resolution of 1280x1024 (minimum: 1024x768)
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- Asvkooof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- KeiTakahashi999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 65.229.4.133 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. TigerShark (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 180.195.212.14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1086 three times in the last 5 minutes (Disruptive edit summaries, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 209.7.64.10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 24.51.233.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 199.235.50.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- DentistRecommended (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - continues removing unresolved maintenance templates, even after final warning yesterday. This new user has made 514 edits in 3 days, all only removing maintenance templates or adding short descriptions, no actual content edits. - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 0 |
| Empty articles | 2 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 7 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 13 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- RandomDudeThatDoesntLikePropaganda (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- KitKatClub20 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- HighamLane (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Edit to Higham Lane School. Tacyarg (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Chinawaterrisk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Clear WP:COI user and only edits China Water Risk. - Imcdc Contact 18:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. This account has not edited in over 11 years. Cullen328 (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)- The username is old, the issue is the spam article. Secretlondon (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Spam articles are not addressed here. 331dot (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes but they were not addressed at all - which I've attempted to do. Secretlondon (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Spam articles are not addressed here. 331dot (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- King George Henry (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Uhhhh. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Myrealnamm Uhhhh what? There's no prohibition on accounts named after dead people, and even if there were, this could be a Mark at WidgetFactory situation. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 01:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC) 
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. I think that he's been dead long enough that this isn't plausibly impersonation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Myrealnamm Uhhhh what? There's no prohibition on accounts named after dead people, and even if there were, this could be a Mark at WidgetFactory situation. --Ahecht (TALK
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Minakshi Pillai and Mr.fakepolicy: I looked deeper since I recall declining a request on this topic yesterday, and I see that both of you seem to prefer edit warring to discussing the changes you disagree about on the article talk pages. Both of you need to start discussing your disagreements or trying other forms of dispute resolution. If you continue edit warring instead, I will block you both. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent de-stabilization and please restore this stable version [1] if the edit warring constant. Mr.Hanes 
Talk 14:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined. Pages will not be full protected indefinitely, period. The article was full protected 5 days ago because of edit warring, and the same editors resumed edit warring as soon as that protection expired. Our only remaining recourse is to block those editors. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Then, I am requesting temporary full protection for the page because it is being disturbed repeatedly. Mr.Hanes
Talk 15:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I agree that we usually do not fully protect indefinitely. But: there seems to be a (rough) consensus on talk on how to proceed... which is ignored by a single user; better to deal with this on a direct base instead of locking the whole page down. Lectonar (talk) 15:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Then, I am requesting temporary full protection for the page because it is being disturbed repeatedly. Mr.Hanes
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal/tampering of sourced info. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was a flurry of disruptive activity that seemed to die out more than a week ago. Please make a new request if sufficient disruptive activity resumes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry from User:Legende Legende Legende since the expiry of the last protection level on 2024-05-15. Alith Anar 16:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. IP range blocked for 10 years. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP editor's consistent disruptive editing, use of WP:OR, and being WP:POINTY all without even attempting to open a discussion on the talk page. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to leave this for another admin, but from what I see nobody, including yourself, has attempted to open a discussion. At a glance, the edits you are reverting as "disruptive" are also adding citations from publications that are generally considered reliable, sometimes the same ones that you are using, which suggests to me that this is a content dispute. In these situations I would look for a discussion on the talk page to determine a consensus on how best to reflect the information in the article, and would determine who is being disruptive and edit warring inappropriately based on that. In the absence of such a discussion, I would be using admin tools to prejudice one side of a content dispute, and I would prefer not to. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Given recent reporting that The Heritage Foundation plans to dox Wikipedia editors, Heritage's own page will likely be an attractive target for unhelpful edits. Trivialist (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 16:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:50, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 17:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
- Template:Abuse filter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Abf (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Template-protected redirects to semi-protected template doesn't make sense. Nobody (talk) 08:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Aidillia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights
Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) In Buried Hearts, there's a bit of mess with the history, seeing that it was first deleted but later recreated and then expanded, this time, with copyright violations which remained not until GreenLipstickLesbian fixed and requested a revision deletion today. Checking through some other creations revealed some issues like grammar errors. Things like these are what the NPP is for, and English Wikipedia is not ready to keep copyvios on the site, not ever.
- It also appears to be that Labor Attorney Noh Moo-jin had copyvio issues, which GLL fixed too. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I don't know if translating from a website is forbidden, because a few months ago, there was someone who reverted my edit because of no reliable sources for the description I wrote myself. So after that, what was included in the sources I used. Many people I see do that. And now I know I'm trying to remove it as much as possible and do some fixing. Aidillia(talk) 11:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pseud 14 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets the minimum criteria, and the majority of their creations have passed a quality content review. It's been a little bit since the last creation, but I believe this editor has demonstrated enough familiarity with the policies and guidelines surrounding new articles that input from NPP will not be needed in the future. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cmacauley (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
File mover
[edit]- Steven Crossin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’m returning and previously held this role as part of my work to move images to Commons. Could I have this restored, please? Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- CommunityNotesContributor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Leaning towards no, mainly on account of a lack of demonstrated need, but willing to be overruled or persuaded otherwise. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- As an example; I'd be able to close this RM if there is no consensus, as I did the previous that lacked consensus, but I wouldn't be able to if there was consensus. The one I closed had sat in the backlog for almost two months. CNC (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Steven Crossin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I previously completed many XFD discussions as a non-admin which resulted in the use of this user right for round robin deletions, and have shown good use of it before. I understand it’s been a while since I’ve been back, so wondering if this can be restored as I intend to complete this work again. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Done; welcome back! Let me know if you also want autopatrolled or NPR back. charlotte 👸♥ 20:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be great if you could. Time to dust off the shovel and get cleaning again! Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 21:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hameltion (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I find myself not infrequently asking at RM/TR to move drafts over existing redirects with bits of history; I'd appreciate being able to do that myself. I also like taking in part in RMs and would like to be able to help with more than just the easiest closes. Thanks. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not seeing a huge need but do agree there is a fair amount of RM and RM/TR experience. Short trial is probably on the table, will think on it. Primefac (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Intrisit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Gwanki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Freedoxm (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Even if you're not pending changes reviewer, you can reject pending changes by reverting them. Pending changes reviewer, on the other hand, gives you the ability to accept changes. Rusty 🐈 14:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I already know that, and the reason why im really requesting this is to accept pending changes and to reject them at the same time. (forgot to put the acceptance part) 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 03:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ultraodan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 08:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mithilanchalputra7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- ArtistPrime (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Have been a part of Wikipedia for a while now, usually contributing with proofreading, rewriting for clarity, updating data, removing inaccurate data, etc. With most of my contributions being of an editing nature (rather than creating something new), I think that being able to approve pending edits from others would allow me to contribute more. ArtistPrime (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 68 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 16:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done You have had account for quite a while, but you don't actually use it all that much and I'm not seeing the kind of relevant experience we normally expect before granting this. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Bakhtar40 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am aware the Reviewing process for Pending Changes. I might help to reduce load. Good Faith. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done This request is barely coherent and does not give me confidence that you fully understand what this permission does or how to use it. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- WormEater13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As someone who frequently edits and creates U.S. state legislature pages and living biographies, I strongly believe that receiving this permission will allow me to help combat vandalism, especially as the wikis of living people are often vandalized. I am 100% aware of being able to revert vandalized edits -- however, some edits are genuine, and I would love to help out in that domain of expertise. WormEater13 (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 37 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 14:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done We generally don't consider granting this for users with less than two hundred article edits, and your request makes me question if you actually understand what pending changes is and how it works. Feel free to re-apply when you have more relevant experience. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- BittersweetParadox (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I had "pending change" privileges, but for some reason they are gone. I think I had to request to renew them but I did not realize. I apologize. I have been focused on doing other things on Wikipedia, such as cleaning up article categorization, but I would like to start using the "pending review" privilege if possible. I make daily edits to all types of Wikipedia pages and am familiar with the style guide. My ideas for things aren't always popular but I respect when conversations happen that challenge my edits because that's how Wikipedia becomes a better place. I always assume good faith, but I also understand that not everyone possesses that. Thank you. BittersweetParadox (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done Beeblebrox Beebletalks 09:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- TheAstorPastor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting this to assist with reviewing edits. I am fairly active on this platform and occasionally handle edit requests. I have made significant contributions to articles, including List of things named after Julius Caesar, which I have nominated for FL. I have also participated in some AFDs and believe that I am eligible for this. The AP (talk) 10:59, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cameremote (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As a relatively new Wikipedia editor, I quickly grasped the core principles and ideology of the encyclopedia. With over 500 edits and several articles created, I have made steady progress, and at my current editing rate, I project to reach 30,000+ edits by the end of 2025. The Pending Changes Reviewer privilege would provide me an opportunity to my broaden efforts against page vandalism and ensure accurate, stable, and reliable content. I sincerely appreciate rejections or acceptance given my understanding, however, please endeavor to leave any explanation if you deem it fit to reject. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 15:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- JurassicClassic767 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
It works in tandem with reverting vandalism and it can be a good alternative for tackling possible vandalism or content that's not appropriate for Wikipedia. I'm already familiar with vandalism policy and handling inappropriate edits as I'm a rollbacker. Additionally, I'm very familiar with Wikipedia's content policy, given that I've been editing for around 5 years now. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 21:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As I also do recent changes patrolling, having this permission will extemeley help me with combatting vandals, as edits requesting review can be viewed on the Recent Changes page, which will help me.
Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 23:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Closed Limelike Curves (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I know this may come as a bit of a shock, but I'd like to request the "pending changes reviewer" permission so that I can review some pending changes. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
My sole purpose for editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I created 20+ pages and performed 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. I also have almost unlimited spare time to edit Wikipedia. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- NXcrypto (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi NXcrypto, please undo Special:Diff/1265567139 and respond to Worldbruce's concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but Worldbruce was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of Special:Diff/1265564114 indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and disengage from the conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Patrick_Welsh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Wikipedia more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Wikipedia's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Wikipedia before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Patrick Welsh, thank you very much for requesting this permission, and for the calm, thoughtful request. For a permission that allows you to undo a series of edits with one click that is granted only on request because its overuse is so tempting, there's not a better application one could file. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done happily ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier.
Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320, is there something in the Simple Wikipedia you may like to reconsider? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- What do you mean? ive only done 2 edits to the simple wikipedia
- 1 to the ultrakill page
- 2 to my user page Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- oh wait i know what you mean. ill change that. @ToBeFree Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done, i just copy n' pasted my userpage from the main wikipedia over to the simple. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 15:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- oh wait i know what you mean. ill change that. @ToBeFree Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 01:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- John (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi there. I was an admin for years but lot my bit through inactivity. I do a fair bit of anti-vandalism work and regaining this right would save me a few clicks. John (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Of course! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Steven Crossin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Previously I held rollback before my departure as part of my anti-vandalism work, so hoping for this to be restored. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "rollbacker" user right. — MusikBot talk 18:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)- Already done by Acalamari (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Steven Crossin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi there, I had the user right previously (see my user rights log. I’m back to Wikipedia so hoping to have this right restored, my return was prompted by a TFD and I’d like to make sure it’s not in use and modify the source template if required (if some of my other user rights could be restored at the same time that’d be appreciated). Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 17:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC) \
- Done and welcome back. Didn't expect to see your name appear in my watchlist! Acalamari 18:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I know, it’s been absolutely forever, but alas I got an email and it prompted me to decide to return again! I’ll pop a request over for the other bits and pieces if that’s OK too. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Of course it's okay - I already switched back on some of them for you :) Acalamari 18:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I know, it’s been absolutely forever, but alas I got an email and it prompted me to decide to return again! I’ll pop a request over for the other bits and pieces if that’s OK too. Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 18:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links