User talk:Bernardirfan

Hello Bernardirfan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you feel that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EdChem (talk) 12:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 00:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Hi, I advise you to write clearer edit summaries when you replace HTML tags by {{chem2}}.

"Using HTML instead of chem2" sounds to me as if you were doing it the other way around.

Happy editing. --TwainNeverSaidThat 02:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Replacing HTML with chem2"? Bernardirfan (talk) 03:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, much better. --TwainNeverSaidThat 16:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice. Bernardirfan (talk) 00:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extra white spaces

Hello Bernardirfan! Did you know that in some countries, it is the convention to space sentences with an enlarged or with a double space? This is the reason why you will sometimes find double spaces after a period/full stop in Wikipedia articles. However, the wiki software does not render these double spaces, instead condensing them into one space, so there is no need to remove them (see MOS:DOUBLESPACE). It's in fact better to ignore them, because that way you won't unnecessarily appear on other editors' watchlists. Thanks for taking this into consideration, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 18:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. In the English language, a single spaced sentences is a standard by an official grammar institutions today. Multiple-spaced sentences and words in the English language is an error, and despite HTML converts them to a single space, multiple consecutive white spaces still spend more memory in the servers and other electronic machines (computers, mobile phones, notebooks, whatever), because a white space is a character with an ASCII code, and there are multiple types of a white space (tabs for example), so, I will not ignore them, and I will continue to delete unnecessary extra white spaces between the words and sentences, sorry. I found so many double, triple, even quadruple consecutive white spaces between words and sentences, as well a single spaced words and sentences on the same page. Obviously, many of double or multiple spaces between words and sentences in the English articles are typos. I will delete them, except when they are put there on purpose. Read the link you provided again! And it is necessary for my change to appear on other editor's watchlist, to inform them that a double or multiple-spaced sentences in the English language is an error. Bernardirfan (talk) 00:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bernardirfan, do you realize that by every edit you make to Wikipedia, a new copy of the entire page is saved on the Wikipedia servers? By removing spaces, you are not reducing memory use by a few bytes, you are adding thousands and thousands of bytes (e.g., this page is 26,450 bytes in length, so this purely cosmetic edit effectively added more than twenty-six thousand bytes of memory to the servers). Also consider that editors' hours are the most valuable asset we have on this project: if we'd have to pay our editors by the hours, we would be able to buy Google's server parks with that kind of money! But that said, of course the hours you spend here are also very valuable, and it's most important that you should enjoy what you're doing here; I will therefore not bother you with this any further. Happy editing!

☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 10:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion by your statements: We should not make any edits at all because we are adding thousands and thousands of bytes to the Wikipedia servers, even if we add/delete only one character. Yes, do not bother me, please.Bernardirfan (talk) 18:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polyyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellflower. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercuric amidochloride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Taking Out The Trash. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dibutyltin dioctanoate without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was a mistake, thank you for restoring the content. Actually, you just gave me an idea to maybe expand the article named "Dibutyltin dioctanoate", because I saw pretty much data about that chemical from relevant sources accross the internet. So, if I expand the article named "Dibutyltin dioctanoate", the link dibutyltin dioctanoate would lead to the article named "Dibutyltin dioctanoate", not to the article named "Dibutyltin dilaurate" (in other words, the link dibutyltin dioctanoate would not redirect to "Dibutyltin dilaurate"), because those two compounds are not the same. I don't know if I expand the "Dibutyltin dioctanoate" article (with the much greater content full of relevant info and the whole

table named "Dibutyltin dioctanoate" full of data, like image of the structure of the dibutyltin dioctanoate molecule, CAS number, Appearance, Melting point, Pictograms, Hazards, etcetera) will be automatically deleted and restored to redirect to the article named "Dibutyltin dilaurate", or I may continue to expand the "Dibutyltin dioctanoate" article with new information from relevant sources... I already created one article named "Hexafluorophosphazene", and it was accepted by Wikipedia.

Bernardirfan (talk) 04:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about my idea? Bernardirfan (talk) 04:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyhexatin has been accepted

Cyhexatin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetrapropyltin has been accepted

Tetrapropyltin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dimethyl trithiocarbonate has been accepted

Dimethyl trithiocarbonate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipropyltin dichloride has been accepted

Dipropyltin dichloride, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 08:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: S,S'-Dimethyl dithiocarbonate has been accepted

S,S'-Dimethyl dithiocarbonate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethyl xanthic acid has been accepted

Ethyl xanthic acid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated Wikilinks

Hey! Thanks for your contribs to choline. Just wanted to point out that a bunch of the wikilinks you added were removed previously due to being a violation of MOS:Overlink, specifically MOS:DUPLINK, as stated in the edit summary for the edit that removed them. Links that are duplicated and not in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead aren't "missing" but if you found some that were, thanks for fixing them. Figured you'd want to save some energy for the other good edits you do. Lalaithan (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Bernardirfan (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choline hydroxide has been accepted

Choline hydroxide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 18:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N,N-Dimethylethanolamine bitartrate has been accepted

N,N-Dimethylethanolamine bitartrate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choline bitartrate (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article has potential, although it needs more citations for verification. You are welcome to resubmit it if you feel that it is good enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Choline bitartrate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 19:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bernardirfan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 19:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Walter Tau (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to help you to overcome deletionist objections.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choline bitartrate has been accepted

Choline bitartrate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹ Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 05:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praseodymium-141:

Thank you! Bernardirfan (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bernardirfan. Thank you for your work on Choline bitartrate. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a good day today. Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged you to make more! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:

Thank you! Have a good time! Bernardirfan (talk) 19:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Tetrafluorohydrazine. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I changed the sentence you noticed to "Tetrafluorohydrazine is used in organic synthesis and as an oxidizing agent for rocket fuels." to avoid plagiarism. Bernardirfan (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silylgermane has been accepted

Silylgermane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pentyl group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silylgermane

The article Silylgermane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Hard to make and handle with no given applications.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Project Osprey (talk) 22:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silylgermane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethyl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hydrogen chalcogenide into Polysulfane. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for adding your eddit summary about the copied text. I added the {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. I have read all links you provided, but I still don't understand where I can get the ID of the source page and the destination page. Please help me... Bernardirfan (talk) 19:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Click on an old revision of a page and the identification number (diff number) is part of the url for that version of the page. It's a numerical count of every edit to Wikipedia since the very beginning of the website. There's been over a billion edits to Wikipedia. The diff numbers are currently a ten-digit number starting with 1. For example, 1166340899 is the ID number for this edit. — Diannaa (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Over a billion, wow! Thank you! Bernardirfan (talk) 13:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fluoroboric acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxonium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Diphenyl sulfide has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diphenyl sulfide. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diphenyl sulfide has been accepted

Diphenyl sulfide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plumbate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thiophosphoryl fluoride, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Critical point and Dipole moment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	a fellow cranker who listens Smokefoot (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they care. Thanks! Bernardirfan (talk) 00:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not into this sort of thing, but you should know that others care.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Bernardirfan!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon dioxide edit

I have restored and modified your edit on CO2 from 24 Dec 2023. It was a good idea to identify pKa1 and pKa2, but the problem was that there is also a third value pKa1(apparent), as explained in the section "In aqueous solution". See my version. Dirac66 (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bernardirfan (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ammonium dinitramide, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Meda Keeling (talk) 19:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a vandalism, because you seen my changes during my very changing! What the hell are you talking about?! You are falsely accusing me for vandalising Wikipedia, like the article Ammonium dinitramide. Importing new info and correcting my code errors or others code errors is not vandalism. Last warning! If you accuse me of vandalising Wikipedia again, or even you blocking me from editing Wikipedia, I will take serious measures against you bullying me on Wikipedia! Bernardirfan (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This warning was placed by a brand new editor, who has been "correcting" a lot of helpful improvements, then placing "final warnings" on the editor's talk page. Pay it no mind, and thanks for your help. _signed,Willondon (talk)

FWIW,

thought you'd like to know. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Bernardirfan (talk) 20:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Potassium trithiocarbonate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monovalent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]