Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Mick Knapton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bold text Welcome

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Lst27 15:27, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Bodmin Moor

[edit]

Could you add some information on the source of this picture to the image page (you click on the picture in the article to get there). Also how large is this object? Rmhermen 00:14, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)

Hi the Cheesewring is 7 metres in height: The photograph is my own taken on holiday in Cornwall in September 2003.

Kelso Abbey

[edit]

Hey Mick. Thanks for starting the Kelso Abbey article. Welcome along :-) Adambisset 13:49, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Image tags

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you very much for the images you are contributing to Wikipedia, you seem to have a very impressive collection of images. One thing that would be of service would be if you could specify which license you are releasing the pictures under. The most common license is the GFDL, to release an image under the GFDL simply add {{GFDL}} to each image's page. A list of other possible licenses and tags can be found at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Below is a list of the images you have uploaded. If you have a couple minutes it would be much appreciated if you could add copyright tags to them. - SimonP 21:08, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)

- [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 19:23, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)


Bedale

[edit]

Thanks for supplying the picture of Bedale. Ta very much! Borderer 15:12, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Conwy Railway Bridge

[edit]

Excellent photo - it add a great deal to the article. I travel over the bridge almost weekly but the train never provides a good view of the bridge. Velela 20:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Roger De Vlaeminck

[edit]

Hello I'm French and I ave used your picture of Roger De Vlaeminck for the French encyclopedia. Could you say me in which Paris-Roubaix this picture was taken ? Thank you and sorry for my english. fr:Utilisateur:Antoinel

I have added the same photo to the dutch wiki about Roger De Vlaeminck and would like to know the details aswell. If you can provide them off course ;-) 82.157.156.158 19:05, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) nl:Gebruiker:NielsB

Eskdale photos

[edit]

Hey Mick,

Great photos of Eskdale. I used to stay at Penny Hill Farm as a kid and it was really nice to see the photo of Harter Fell. Even after spending time in the Alps, Eskdale is still a beautiful place.

Regards, Keith

Hey! :) I really really like your photos... I found one of them that justabout fitted my new article at Coldstream Bridge, but I wondered if you had one that featured more on the (very interesting) bridge and less on the Tweed? If you did it would be fantastic, if not, I am sure we can make do with the current one. Thanks a lot for all your work on the British geography articles! --TheGrappler 22:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The new picture is now in place at Coldstream Bridge, thanks a lot! :) --TheGrappler 00:00, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Again, thanks for the photos! I don't suppose you have one for the Royal Border Bridge too? That's the Victorian railway viaduct carrying the East Coast Mainline over the Tweed - it's a pretty dramatic sight, but I haven't been able to find a free photograph for it! Thanks, TheGrappler 16:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You asked too early. There now is at least one, see Commons:Image:Royal Border Bridge 2001-01-07.jpg for instance.--Klaus with K 17:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark V

[edit]

Hallo Mick! Very nice article about Bovington Tank Museum! And very, very nice pictures. Especially the one of the Mark V! Could you possibly put it (or any other of course :o) on WikiCommons also? There's a number of foreign language wikiprojects that would benefit greatly from the inclusion of your gorgeous picture(s). WWI vehicles are quite rare and it's difficult to obtain photos of them. Thanks anyhow,--MWAK 3 July 2005 14:25 (UTC)

Thank you for your efforts! I've already put them to good use.--MWAK 4 July 2005 18:07 (UTC)


My congrats on the pics too! I was worried that whenI'm down there later in the year, I'd have to drag my wife round the place photgraphing everything that wasn't already on wikipedia. Just one question, the TOG2, for a reference point, how tall is the little person (your grand-daughter?)in front of itGraemeLeggett 4 July 2005 19:22 (UTC)

Roger De Vlaeminck - part II

[edit]

Could you please provide more information about the photo you have uploaded about Roger De Vlaeminck? If you dont have any information, please say so. nl:gebruiker:NielsB

After consulting with my father he seems to think that it is the 1978 edition of Paris-Roubaix - Mick Knapton
Thank you very much! I will add this info to the photo on the dutch wiki. 22:26, 4 August 2005 (UTC) NielsB

Eskdale

[edit]

Sincere apologies for removing your picture. I appreciate the effort you went to in taking it (hard to get to valley is Eskdale!) and I guess I just forgot that you can have two pictures in the same article! I think your picture is better, come to think of it I'm not even siure if my picture's of Eskdale at all!

Thanks for not deleting the other picture. Actually I got it from this website. They aim to have a photo from every 1km grid square in Britain, and all the images are licensed as Creative Commons Attribution, so they are suitable for copying onto wikipedia. Apologies for forgetting to license it. --Mark J 15:43, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Paris-Tours

[edit]

Why didn't you just use "292 km" on your new map at Paris-Tours? The objection wasn't to your use of a symbol; it was to your use of the improper symbol "KM". While there are situations in which the spelled out word can be capitalized, it looks ugly here, and even spelled out would be better with a lowercase k. But since this differs from the rules that the symbols are case sensitive, I won't revert it, just letting you know that it could be better. The shading on this new version is also too dark for my tastes. Gene Nygaard 17:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Many thanks for the photo. This is a very late reply, haven't had time to log on to Wiki since I started teacher-training! Your photo collection is a great contribution to Wikipedia. :-) TheGrappler 19:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice photos, thanks for telling me about them. Happy New year! Grinner 11:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supertram liveries

[edit]

Hi! Seeing as there have now been a couple of changes of livery, perhaps it would be good to add a section to the supertram article on the various liveries that have been used. This would then be a good place to put photos that illustrate each livery. I found this photograph that illustrates the original livery, but I'm sure that there are more out there. JeremyA 21:25, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lake District fells

[edit]

Just a word of thanks about the Lake District fells you've added over time - you write really nice articles with excellent picture. Keep it up! Grinner

Brilliant article. I've nommed it for WP:DYK, hope you don't mind. Your photos are superb, and belie the rumour that the sun never shines in the UK. ++Lar: t/c 21:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Updated DYK query Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Kisdon Force, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your efforts on this one! ++Lar: t/c 21:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demolition Article

[edit]

Well Mick, I am not finished with the demolition article. I am about to add a couple more pictures to the article, including yours. The reason I removed yours is because it is very difficult to see the excavator in your picture. Congrats on getting a pic of a long-reach excavator though, I am sill searching for one to take a pic of. KeepOnTruckin 20:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look at it now; is that good?

KeepOnTruckin 17:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image license

[edit]

Hi Mike, I've found that there's a "broken" file, a photo made by you. Could you please add more information (date perhaps?) and a license to Image:The Cheesewring 2.jpg (cf. history), so that it won't get deleted? Thanks a lot, nice shot :-) --Ü 23:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday Hi Mick Knapton. I am inviting you to join the WikiProject on Sheffield Wednesday, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of articles relating to Sheffield Wednesday F.C. You have received this message either because you have previously edited pages related to Sheffield Wednesday or you have stated on Wikipedia that you are a fan of the club. This is a fledgling WikiProject and we would welcome your contributions, please visit the project page for more details. Dan1980 11:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply] WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday
  • Great to have you aboard Mick. Contributions to any Sheffield Wednesday related articles are welcome, so feel free to write about the subjects that you are most knowledgable on. You can find a list of the articles that are in need of most work here. — Dan1980 11:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mick,
You're not treading on my toes at all. There's loads to do so we appreciate your help wherever you can give it. When you create articles relating to Sheffield Wednesday please could you add the tag {{WPSWFC}} to the top of the article's talk page. This automatically adds it to Category:WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday articles and makes it easier to keep track of the articles covered by the WikiProject.
I've added a paragraph to the Peter Swan article about his short managerial career at Matlock Town. As far as I am aware he did not manage any other clubs, but if you know different please add them to the article.
Cheers, Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 17:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 24 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beinn a' Ghlo, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Blnguyen | rant-line 06:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Central Fells

[edit]

Hello. I've started adding some of the missing fells, and seen your fine work all over the District. I was wondering if you have any photos handy for the central fells I've started? I only seem to walk in the kind of weather that means I need a GPS just to find my sandwiches. Two more centrals to go and then I'm planning to move east of Kirkstone for a bit. One thing that strikes me as a newcomer to this wiki lark, is that there's several Wainwright formats out there already. I copied one that seemed prevalent, only to find it wasn't particularly. Once all the articles are up and running presumably all interested parties can agree on a standard beauty treatment?Bobble Hat 22:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, cracking pictures.Bobble Hat 22:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Central Fells again!

[edit]

I've started adding a template for wainwright's central fells to the relevent ones and discussed this with bobble hat earlier (as you've probably seen). Sorry I didnt put a note on your talk page then. Do you think the templates ok? and importantly, i guess, is the format suitable for using on the other areas etc? Thanks Suicidalhamster 11:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sheffield Wednesday F.C. has been nominated for a Featured article. The voting is going well so far. Please add your support/comments by clicking the link in the title of this message.

Cheers, Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 19:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 20 September, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Great Cockup, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Great article and pic too! Thanks! --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 18:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wednesday Players

[edit]

I would love to have a short section on Wednesday legends, but I don't think that the 100 greatest players list would work. A poll among Wikipedians would be considered OR and/or POV. What we could do is include a list of players from an already established poll such as the legends section on the official website. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 13:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

[edit]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 23:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Mamores

[edit]

Just a quick note to praise your articles about Sgurr a' Mhaim, Am Bodach and An Gearanach. Great work as always. Grinner 20:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second that nice articles. Great! There are millions of smaller hills in Scotland too that are not covered on wikpiedia. All the best!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Chrysanthemum" is one of my favourite hills too! thanks for the article. Grinner 15:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject British hills

[edit]

Hi, I've just created Wikipedia:WikiProject British hills and thought you might be interested in joining. Cheers, --Blisco 22:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please have a Barnstar: I am impressed !

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
A well deserved virtual award for your outstanding work on British hills and the excellent photographs which accompany them. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed Ben More Assynt at new articles because I remembered it being missing. A really fine article, and great pictures, so I had a peek through your contribs and I'm really impressed. The photography is excellent - I think Image:Stob Ban (Mamores) from Sgurr a' Mhaim.jpg is my favourite out of your recent uploads. Best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 18 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ben More Assynt, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 10:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Reversion of Ben More Assynt

[edit]

Hey, what was wrong with my changes? I don't think I took anything away (apart from the derivation of 'Assynt', which I explained in the edit summary); I just moved stuff around so it was better organised, with a concise lead and sections arranged thematically per the Manual of Style, and added a few pieces of information and/or clarified some points. Please don't feel offended - you wrote a great article, I was just trying to make it clearer for the general reader. If there were any specific things you think were out of order (in either sense!) then by all means put them right or address the matter on the talk page, but why the wholesale reversion? --Blisco 13:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[From User talk:Blisco] The article was on the main page for most of Saturday (not nominated by me), everybody else seemed quite happy with it, did small changes and I received some plaudits, until you decided to give it a major overhaul. Thats the reason I was not happy as you had done something similar with Sgurr na Lapaich. If this is your policy for your so called "Key Mountains" than I think I'll leave them alone and concentrate on other Munros and Wainwrights. Mick Knapton 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mick, first of all please don't take any of my edits as criticism. I really think you're doing a great job with the articles you're creating. Ben More Assynt in particular covered just the sort of information I think these articles should – topography, geology, wildlife, ascent routes – exactly the things we were discussing. My 'overhaul' was a sincere and good-faith attempt to present the information in a clearer way, as well as adding a few extra bits of information. True, it was a lot of changes at once, and some of them (e.g. putting commas in 4-digit numbers) were not at all necessary, but that's just the way I prefer to work. As I said above, I didn't take anything out, and made fairly few changes to the actual wording. I honestly believe that it's now among the best articles we've got on British hills (which is not a bad achievement for an article 5 days old), and most of the effort is yours.
Please remember that no one can claim ownership of an article on Wikipedia. As it says on the edit page, "If you don't want your material to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it". This is a collaborative project, and we're all meant to be working together to improve the encyclopedia. That's why I set up the WikiProject in the first place – to try and define some common goals and practices, rather than just working away at our own areas of interest. The fact that other users say nice things about an article in a particular state doesn't mean that it can't be improved beyond that state - Wikipedia is in a constant process of improvement.
You haven't told me what aspects of my overhaul you didn't like. Do you not like articles divided into sections? (Read the Manual of Style and you'll find it recommended over and over again.) Do you think I was wrong to order things the way I did? (To which I say fair enough, there's no one right way to do it.) Are you offended by changes to your writing style? Did you not like the tone of my edit summary on Sgurr na Lapaich? (If so then I apologise; it was perhaps a bit abrupt, though I stand by the principle – this is an encyclopedia after all.) Or do you get the impression that I'm stalking your edits? If the latter (which I suspect is the case), the truth is that I just happened to notice that you'd created them, was pleased, and thought they could be made even better with a bit of copy-editing and sectioning. In any case, but especially the latter, reverting another editor's hard work without any explanation is not the way forward. If you were offended, then so was I.
As for "my so called 'key mountains'", they're not "mine" any more than the article in question is "yours". The idea came from Ras52, and I created the page following discussion and, I thought, consensus (or at least no objections); it just so happens that so far I've put most of the effort (not all) into classifying them. If you disagree with the principle, perhaps you should say so on the project talk page? And my only "policy" is for all articles, but especially these, to be of the highest quality. I'm interested in all our hills, I want to help create a quality encyclopedia, and I'll edit any article I like. If you don't want me to touch any articles you created then say so, but I'd ask you to consider whether that's in the spirit of Wikipedia. Thanks, Blisco 20:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Far Eastern Fells

[edit]

Mick, there is at least the basis of an article about all of them now. Had a bit of a shock one evening when I decided to research the next missing fell. Preped up on Wansfell, logged on and found you'd written it about 10 minutes before. All a bit surreal, but yours was better anyway. I don't suppose you have any more pictures? Book 1 next.Bobble Hat 16:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good news about the photos. No complaints about Wansfell, its just that I'd only been gone about half an hour, so I'm sat here thinking 'I did look, I'm sure I did, how did I not notice that there's a full article with pictures?' Quite funny, once you realise you haven't gone round the bend.Bobble Hat 22:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK pole position

[edit]
Updated DYK query On November 20, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rosthwaite Fell, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Congratulations. This article which was kindly nominated by GeeJo, has been giving top billing, with the pictured slot.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 9 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Canisp, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 23:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On December 13, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Derry Cairngorm, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks very much Mick for creating many geography articles which was nominated kindly by GeeJo. Feel free to self-nom in future, like the majority of entries. Keep up the great work! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK!

[edit]
Updated DYK query On January 11, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sgurr na Ciste Duibhe, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 20:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 18 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eldon Hill, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 00:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaelic pronounciation

[edit]

Thanks for the tip about Sgurr na Ciste Dhuibhe. I have tried to render it at least partially into IPA. I have to admit I have mixed feelings about IPA, as I think while it is internationally recognised, it can be about as widely understood as Klingon or Esperanto! I wish English wikipedia would agree to a dual pronounciation guide, i.e. one for the linguists, and another for ordinary mortals. The other problem is that there are a few unusual sounds in Gaelic which don't occur in too many other languages, so finding a reference point can be difficult. --MacRusgail 16:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just found your edits. You'll be pleased to see I inserted the pic of E.Window of St. Nicholas. Thanks! --Amandajm 00:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Andrei_Tchmil,_Alfa_Lum_Team_Postcard.jpg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrei_Tchmil,_Alfa_Lum_Team_Postcard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading images/media such as Image:Cruach Ardrain from high on An Caisteal.jpg to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!

Sfan00 IMG 20:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 12 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beinn Chuirn, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 19:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Hennie_Kuiper_Publicity_photo_1977.jpg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Hennie_Kuiper_Publicity_photo_1977.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 07:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article! Slightly annoying that I was working on a draft at the same time - but that's life and yours is much more detailed anyway. Best Iain99 18:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


picture caught my eye

[edit]

Carn nan Gobhar from Sgurr na Lapaich.jpg is really eye catching. well done. Victuallers 12:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tommy_Prim_Postcard.jpg

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tommy_Prim_Postcard.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 19:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hamish Brown - Travels.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hamish Brown - Travels.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Mick, I have an acquaintance who would like to us an image of yours on this page [[1]] for a book he is working on. He has been trying to find contact details for you to request copyright permission. Can you tell me how he would go about contacting you?

Darrell —Preceding unsigned comment added by Togwil (talkcontribs) 20:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darrell, I can be contacted by email at mick_knapton@hotmail.co.uk Best Regards Mick Knapton 11:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peter Swan Book Cover.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Peter Swan Book Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:W.H. Murray book cover.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:W.H. Murray book cover.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK article

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 1 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stob Choire Claurigh, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Keep up the good work. Gimmetrow 13:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eric Caritoux Postcard.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Eric Caritoux Postcard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Milano-Torino Logo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Milano-Torino Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Dear Mick Knapton,

Apologies for this unconventional means of contacting you.

We're interested in using an image of yours in a book Penguin are publishing next year.

I wondered, if you had a moment, if you could give me a call on 020 7010 3352 or drop me an email

adam.oriordan@uk.penguingroup.com


With all good wishes Adam O'Riordan Editorial Assistant, Penguin Press

DYK notice

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 18 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wharncliffe Crags, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations on the coveted pictured slot! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 05:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday

[edit]

Hi Mick,

Just a quick note to let you know that after months of neglect, I am currently working on rennovating WPSWFC. I have already set up 1.0 assessment which should help to identify articles that need work and I'll also be compiling a fresh list of football biography articles that are needed, so feel free to check back in a week or so and help out if you have any spare time!

Cheers, Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 18:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the list of Sheffield Wednesday players is far from complete, so if you notice any missing feel free to add them to the list. I'll be trying to add to it shortly as well as compiling a list of red links and ranking them by priority, so there will be plenty to do! Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 13:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seathwaite Fell

[edit]

Your removal of the graphite mine information from Seathwaite Fell has been partially reversed. There's now a statement about graphite being found on the fell. Lavateraguy (talk) 18:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rodger Wylde

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 3 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rodger Wylde, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 11:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Brian Hornsby

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 4 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brian Hornsby, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 06:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miguel Poblet.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Miguel Poblet.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Stob Coire Sgreamhach
Beinn Eighe
Bardon Hill
Thirlmere
Loweswater
Patterdale
Derwent Water
Watch Hill (Cockermouth)
Torridon
Ennerdale Water
Arrochar Alps
Tarn (lake)
Fell
Wasdale
An Sgurr (Lochcarron)
Pen-y-ghent
Cuillin
Furness Fells
Ben More (Mull)
Cleanup
Scottish Mountaineering Club
Ulverston
Road bicycle racing
Merge
List of church scandals
Haughton, Greater Manchester
Primitive Methodist Church
Add Sources
Cockermouth
The Cobbler
Billinge Hill
Wikify
Marcel Cerdan
Etchingham
Church of God (New Dunkers)
Expand
Pazhuvil Church
Isaiah Benjamin Scott
Northumberland National Park

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who has played for Sheffield Wednesday is within the scope of the WikiProject, whether it is on loan or on a permanent deal, for one game or one hundred. I've added the relevant tags to the article. Nice work. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 19:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great work

[edit]

Hi - just wanted to say how impressed I've been by your recent articles on Hillsborough House, Burrowlee House, Wharncliffe Crags, Church of St. Mary, Ecclesfield and Hillsborough Trinity Methodist Church. I hope there are more to come! Warofdreams talk 20:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tram Pics...

[edit]

Hello Mick,

Could I possibly use your tram pics at trams wikia?. I will of course attribute them too you! I will assume that it is ok to use them, however if it is not please let me know and I will delete them!

Thanks,

BG7 14:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gondola Photo

[edit]

Can I ask when you took the photo of the Gondola on Coniston?

I might be able to identify the helmsman. I do know that the engineer is Dick Ransome, grandson of Arthur Ransome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigglesPiP (talkcontribs) 23:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dates are close, I'm about 90% sure the helmsman is my father; Alan Dawson. - - - BigglesPiP ( Talk | Contribs ) 19:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually looking at the photo again, the helmsman is the boss from the time, My father is standing next to the engineer. - - - BigglesPiP ( Talk | Contribs ) 19:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we have this template? What was wrong {{Sheffield}}, which does almost the same thing? L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 22:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gondola (steam yacht)

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 4 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gondola (steam yacht), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYK Nomination of Ellis Rimmer

[edit]

Hi. I've nominated Ellis Rimmer, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on May 11, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, -- RyRy5 (talkReview) 22:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an article about George Wilson who was an England international and a Wednesday player. Are you able to add anything to the article? Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great work again Mick! I've added Millership's wartime details to the infobox, but couldn't find the wartime appearance data you quoted in any of the references. I assume that you've got it from Since 1888, but I can't access it as I'm too tight to subscribe! Please could you take a look and fill in the blanks?

I also noticed that there's a discrepancy between the SWFC appearance stats quoted in the lead (which I assume are from Since 1888) and those in the infobox (which are from Adrian Bullock). Could you have a look at that too and see if you can work out which ones are correct?

Cheers, Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 20:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't pick up on the fact that the lead mentions his combined league apps; that's what you get for editing an article when you're half asleep I suppose! Is there any mention of the years that he guested for Donny or the Blades? Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 21:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

[edit]

I can't beleive that I haven't already given you one of these, so here you go – it's long overdue!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your hard work creating numerous biographical articles for former Sheffield Wednesday players. Well done! Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 12:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy Davison

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 9 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Teddy Davison, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 05:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article - it took a bit of work to give him his five minutes of fame on the front page! Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield Wednesday WikiProject

[edit]

Hi Mick,

I've just started a new sources section at the Wikiproject and would appreciate it if you could add to it with any useful links that you know of that aren't already listed. The new section can be found here.

There's also a book list that will help in sourcing articles if you need information from a book that you do not own, so if you could add any books that you have to the list then that would be great too.

Finally, I'm in the process of starting individual articles for each of Wednesday's seasons. To start with these will essentially be stubs with an infobox and final league table, but will eventually be fleshed out. If you would like to help by expanding these articles or by creating some of the stubs then feel free to join in – you won't be treading on any toes! There is a full list of the season articles here.

Cheers, Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 21:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 13:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Am Bodach from Stob Choire a' Chairn.jpg

[edit]

Image:Am Bodach from Stob Choire a' Chairn.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Am Bodach from Stob Choire a Chairn.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Am Bodach from Stob Choire a Chairn.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:An Gearanach from Stob Coire a' Chairn.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:An Gearanach from Stob Coire a Chairn.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Slioch from Loch Maree.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Slioch from Loch Maree.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Shire Brook

[edit]
Updated DYK query On January 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shire Brook, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mick; I just found this one and have nominated it for Did You Know? - hope you don't mind. Excellent pictures! Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Strines Reservoir

[edit]
Updated DYK query On February 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Strines Reservoir, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

[edit]

Hi. I've nominated Moss Force, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Bruce1eetalk 13:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Moss Force

[edit]
Updated DYK query On July 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Moss Force, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Derwent Edge

[edit]

The article may be about Derwent Edge, but the infobox (elevation info, OS grid reference, coordinates) is specifically about Back Tor, the highest point on the escarpment. Illustrating the infobox with an image of a place other than Back Tor does not appear to me to make sense. What exactly is your rationale for the change? (The layout problem created by your preferred positioning of the images may be a matter of taste, but note MOS:IMAGES: "Avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other". I believe that having a left-aligned image at the top of an article is discouraged somewhere, as well.) Deor (talk) 21:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jimmy Seed.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jimmy Seed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 67.85.125.17 (talk) 03:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ronnie Starling with FA Cup (1935).jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ronnie Starling with FA Cup (1935).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 15:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

[edit]

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Endcliffe Hall

[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you added Endcliffe Hall to the list of buildings by William Flockton (nice article by the way). It looks to me that Endcliffe Hall was by Flockton & Abbott, and as far as I know the Flockton in that partnership was William's son Thomas James Flockton. I'm not sure what to do here... I started the William Flockton article as an article about the person; but because I included details about the successor firms I redirected the names of those firms to that article, meaning that this is where someone clicking Flockton & Abbott is redirected to. Four solutions come to mind: 1—retitle the table in the article, 2—add a second table to the article for buildings by the successor firms, 3—retitle the article to be about Flockton firms in general rather than just William Flockton, 4—start new articles for the successor firms. Do you have a preference? Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 14:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pity that the hall is so inaccessible, though the military have probably saved it from being swept away. I'll probably move the William Flockton article to a new title and make it more general about the Flockton architects. There seems to be so little information published about the individual Flocktons that that makes sense. —Jeremy (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've moved the article to Flockton (architects) and started work on expanding its scope. See what you think. I'm not sure whether or not to continue the history beyond Gibbs becoming the senior partner, although I see some 20th century buildings attributed to Flockton & Gibbs rather than the other way round; also there are some 1930s buildings attributed to Flockton & Son but I know nothing about this firm. —Jeremy (talk) 02:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Mick Knapton! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Sheila Sherwood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Miguel Poblet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Tommy Prim - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Fife in focus.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fife in focus.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's great to see another well-written and illustrated article relating to Sheffield. Keep up the good work! Warofdreams talk 09:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leah's Yard

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Little Langdale

[edit]

Thanks very much. I'll be nominating it for DYK, possibly along with Lanty Slee, if I can think of a good catchy hook. Any suggestions welcome. JMiall 19:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Veenendaal banner.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Veenendaal banner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

York meetup

[edit]

Hi Mick Knapton. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Listed buildings in Sheffield S6

[edit]

I'm glad you like it - I was actually going to notify you once it was finished; I've just got the last few buildings around High Bradfield to add. Thanks for adding the link; I hope that you can contribute some more of your excellent articles on local buildings (and perhaps some missing pictures, too). Warofdreams talk 14:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of rock formations in the United Kingdom

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of rock formations in the United Kingdom. proposal regarding the scope of the list. -- Bejnar (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

I have tagged commons:File:Het Volk on Oude Kwaremont.jpg (which you originally uploaded here) as lacking evidence of permission from the copyright holder. The image description page contains information about what is required in order to verify that sufficient permission was granted. VernoWhitney (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

St John the Baptist Parish Church, Alnmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Norman and Belfry
Oakes Park, Sheffield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lancaster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suburbs of Sheffield

[edit]

Suburbs of Sheffield is a subcategory of Districts of Sheffield - there is no need to add back the parent category to articles eg Worrall. See also message on talk page of Template:Sheffield about the categories./Oranjblud (talk) 20:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Upperthorpe, Sheffield, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gymnasium and Netherthorpe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gleadless Valley (ward), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.worldwizzy.com/learn/index.php/Gleadless_Valley.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 10:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste move

[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Gleadless Valley a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gleadless Valley (ward). This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Road Wizard (talk) 11:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry if you thought I was accusing you of vandalism. Copy and paste moves cause problems for Wikipedia but they are generally made by people who are not familiar with the move tool. The notice above explains the problem and alternative ways you can deal with these situations in future.
In terms of the present case, an admin should be around shortly and delete the ward article. We can then move the old article to Gleadless Valley (ward) (which will leave a redirect at Gleadless Valley). At that point you can overwrite the redirect with your new article text. Regards, Road Wizard (talk) 11:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Gleadless Valley is now free for you to post your new article. Road Wizard (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mick. Firstly, let me say you've done cracking work in your sandbox, thorough research not seen often enough. I have however noted a few errors I would like to address, might I ask you move your content to the article so that others may contribute as if you amend your sandbox, the version I am working on will be outdated. Thanks, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 16:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Mick, I had sandboxed a bit and implemented the changes. I've also created Holy Cross Church, Gleadless Valley as a result of your own sandbox. Thanks, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 21:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

S postcode area (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Loxley and Middlewood
Whirlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Judges

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mick, great job writing Whirlow. Would you mind categorising the photos you've used in [2]. Bear in mind Whirlow photos have already been uploaded. All the best. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 13:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William John Hale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brightside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, I'd say. Most informative. Bmcln1 (talk) 22:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Five Arches

[edit]
That's interesting - thanks for tracking that down. I've got a couple of maps which show the postcode boundary as immediately west of the viaduct, but that could be an approximation. Herries Road is definitely in S6 west of the junction with Herries Road South, and definitely in S5 east of the viaduct, but it might even be that the boundary isn't clearly defined there. Maybe it would make sense to include it in both lists, with a note - what do you think? Warofdreams talk 22:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Hi Mick, I really enjoyed the article on W J Hale! I'm doing some research about Sheffield architect William John Hale and his own home Tainby and I wondered if you could help me. Do you have any more information about the house? In particular i'm trying to find out why he called it Tainby? Also, in your Wikipedia article on him you say he died at his house, where did you read that?

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks!

- James Jimmyp501 (talk) 13:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello James, thanks for your message regarding William John Hale. It seems that Hale was quite a private person and there is very little information about him in the public domain. Most of the information for the Wikipedia article came from a Sheffield Undergraduate dissertation by N.D. Wilson which was eventually published in 1998 in the "Chapel Society Miscellany 1". It does not give a reason as to why Hale called his house "Tainby" but it does say that he died at the house. I managed to get a copy of the book from abebooks.com but there are very few copies around as far as I can see. This Link also gives a bit of information on the building. If you need any further help please contact me. Best regards Mick Knapton (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi Mick,

I'd like to use a modified version of one of your photos for a book I'm co-authoring. Didn't know if the old hotmail address from 2007 is still one you use. Can I email you to talk credit line/copyright permissions?

Thanks, Leesha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeshaplante06 (talkcontribs) 20:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures and other contributions

[edit]

Great to see so many photos of the listed buildings. I've been taking a fair few myself, generally in parts of the city you've not yet been to! Your other contributions on localities and buildings are also excellent. I'll create the S11 article soon! Warofdreams talk 18:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listed buildings in Sheffield S11 is now complete. Warofdreams talk 21:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture request

[edit]

Dear Mr. Knapton,

I work as Project Editor in the German publishing house Ernst & Sohn and we will publish a book called "Der Turm und die Brücke". We would like to use a photo of yours in this book. Could you contact me for details or send me your contact data? Thank you very much in advance!

Best regards Jost Lüddecke

jolueddeck@wiley.com

Contributor 0815 first (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield area articles

[edit]

Great to see you creating yet more fantastic articles! I've reverted the unreferenced additions to the Stanedge Pole article, and I'll try to keep a bit of an eye on it; I noticed your previous revert and agreed with it.

It's also great to see the S6 article nearly complete. I'll leave High Lea in the list until I eventually create an S35 article; in the meantime, there's still the potential to take photos in most of the rest of the city! Warofdreams talk 17:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Lawrence Parish Church, Hunworth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piscine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks Mick. Always nice to get positive feedback. DjlnDjln (talk) 16:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milano-Torino Logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milano-Torino Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BaldBoris 11:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milan turin map.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Milan turin map.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. BaldBoris 11:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeeExpus - Far From Home.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeeExpus - Far From Home.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fulwood

[edit]

You always write excellent articles, and it's great to see your plans for some very useful future ones! I think other areas which could do with articles include Beighton and Mosborough. I had a go a while ago at an article on Hollow Meadows and am still slowly taking photos of listed buildings. thanks, Warofdreams talk 13:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Boulsover, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turnpike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Tory and Sons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Mick Knapton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Service award for article creation

[edit]

You are one of a tiny number of editors selected at random from those who have created a good number of articles. There is some preliminary discussion about creating an award for article creation, and your input would be helpful. See the discussion HERE. The posts toward the end are the most germane. Lou Sander (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vic Mobley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Mick Knapton. You have new messages at DrStrauss's talk page.
Message added 18:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

DrStrauss talk 18:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mick Knapton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Cockroft

[edit]

Hi Mick, Hope you don't mind but I have a favour to ask if that's OK? I notice that you have previously used The Wednesday Boys (ISBN 0-9547264-9-9) as a reference and wondered if you could check something for me? I gather the book states that Joe Cockroft made 198 wartime appearances for Wednesday, scoring 13 goals. Could you just confirm this and let me know the page number for the ref please? Many thanks, Nzd (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant, thanks for doing that. Cheers, Nzd (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Masonic buildings in the United States —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doncram (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you actually edited at a list of men's clubhouse buildings, but the same split vs. merger issue applies. This is explicitly about Masonic buildings in the U.S. and will also apply worldwide. Your participation in the discussion would be welcome. --Doncram (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Paris-Brussels Map.JPG

[edit]

You uploaded or restored , File:Paris-Brussels Map.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

When you have copmpleted the above steps: to indicate that you've accepted the given the license shown, and updated the file description page appropriately.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mick Knapton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Paris-Brussels Map.JPG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Paris-Brussels Map.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]