User talk:OrganicEarth

July 2015

Hello, I'm BusterD. An edit that you recently made to Edmund Kirby Smith seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BusterD (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for my error. Please forgive me. BusterD (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I read a Historical Society discussion saying Violet was the mother but I can't find confirmation one way or the other so I am leaving it ambiguous.. OrganicEarth (talk) 21:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds wise. Again, I'm sorry for jumping the gun. (Under the unfortunate circumstances of the day, it seems quite obvious that the mother would be easier to determine than the father.) Your first edits appear to be very helpful and the last thing I wish to do is discourage your participation in Wikipedia. Continue to edit boldly! If I can be of any assistance, please feel invited to call on me. BusterD (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo BusterD. You have been exceptionally courteous and I appreciate your offer and encouragement. Party on. OrganicEarth (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, OrganicEarth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BusterD (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OrganicEarth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi OrganicEarth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, OrganicEarth. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 01:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Benjamin W. Kilburn

added a link pointing to White Mountains

Glen House

added a link pointing to White Mountains

Nathan W. Pease

added a link pointing to Chocorua

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images to Wikipedia

I noted you seem to be adding a great deal of images to Wikipedia articles. Please note, Wikipedia is not an image repository. Images should not overwhelm the article (extending way below the article its self[1][2]) and a galleries should not consist of an indiscriminate collection of images. Extra images should be put at the Wikimedia Commons. See also WP:IMAGE and WP:IG. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I try to be judicious but I am a bit of an inclusionist. If you look on Commons you will see LOTS of photos of the falls. I tried to be selective. You'll notice that one shot is aerial and shows the area, another shows cabins in the area named for Goodrich Falls, another shows the falls before a bridge over them and another shows the falls with the covered bridge above. It's a new article so hopefully it will be expanded. OrganicEarth (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be a bit of an inclusionist is fine but there is a Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout as well as consensus guidelines and policy on Wikipedia delineating what is considered encyclopedic. I have cleaned up World's Columbian Exposition based on them (spelled out in the links above). Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jeanloup Sieff may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Sieff''' (November 30, 1933 – September 20, 2000) was a French photographer. He was born in [[Paris to Polish parents. He is famous for his portraits of politicians, famous artists, landscapes,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :(

I am really sorry about demolishing the Kota Raja article and redefining it. I guess I was thinking of the wrong place.Rhumidian (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no problem! I had actually noticed there was a place with the same name in the area of Bali / Lombook, so the subject needed disambiguation. I had meant to come back and sort it all out.

I'm still not really sure if the article I'm working on should be merged into Banda Aceh.. but it was weird that I kept finding photos with the name of a place that I can't even find mentioned in that article that was clearly a prominent place. The history is a little complicated with a Sultanate surrounded by British rule, then Dutch rule, and then independence..

I see there are articles for New Amsterdam and Constantinople. Certainly it wasn't that major a city or capitol, but hopefully I can evolve it to where it's a worthwhile stand alone or section in the parent article. Thanks for your very nice note! No apology is needed and I appreciate your good works. OrganicEarth (talk) 20:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Pierre Michel François Chevalier page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Strasbourg Cathédrale

A tag has been placed on Strasbourg Cathédrale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Implausible French grammatical error

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MopSeeker Fox Three! 02:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN July 2015

Hi. I've mentioned you in a discussion at WP:AN#Moves and page creations by Tobias Conradi socks. I don't mean to make an accusation, just to point out that some aspects of your editing pattern are broadly similar to a number of other editors who have been problematic. It would be useful if you could contribute to that discussion. GoldenRing (talk) 12:10, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you've not responded to this, either here or an AN, I've also mentioned you at the relevant SPI. Again, it'd be helpful if you contributed (constructively) there. GoldenRing (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Purwodadi, Sumatra

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. OrganicEarth, thanks for creating Purwodadi, Sumatra!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Henk Schick Nordholt

Hi OrganicEarth! Are you sure that the middle name of this KITLV professor is "Schick", as you have written in the title? His personal profile page on the kitlv website says it's "Schulte", and I can hardly find anything when googling for "Henk Schick Nordholt". - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I was editing it under that name and then I thought I saw something that had Schick so I thought I had confused the middle name with the art historian. I put it back. OrganicEarth (talk) 12:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East Java

added links pointing to Kediri and Residency

Henk Schick Nordholt

added links pointing to Ubud and Free University

Karangasem Regency

added links pointing to Kubu and Abang

Abun

added a link pointing to West Papua

Charles J. Kleingrothe

added a link pointing to Deli

Dubalang

added a link pointing to Minangkabau

Henricus Marinus Neeb

added a link pointing to Kampong

Mademoiselle Dazie

added a link pointing to New York Star

Mamasa Regency

added a link pointing to Bambang

Musi Banyuasin Regency

added a link pointing to Lais

Musi Rawas Regency

added a link pointing to Musi River

North Musi Rawas Regency

added a link pointing to Musi River

North Tapanuli Regency

added a link pointing to Muara

Palace Theatre (New York City)

added a link pointing to Playhouse

Payakumbuh

added a link pointing to Minangkabau

Pierre Molinier

added a link pointing to Montage

Same, East Timor

added a link pointing to Estado Novo

South Nias Regency

added a link pointing to Kampong

South Sulawesi

added a link pointing to Malino

South Tapanuli Regency

added a link pointing to Arse

World's Columbian Exposition

added a link pointing to Incubator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balinese theater

Hello OrganicEarth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Balinese theater for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 17:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

possibility of easily fixing some recent ambiguous links

Hi, thanks for your recent contributions! I came to ask if you could possibly revisit some of them, to make them even more valuable with more precise links. For example, at Henricus Marinus Neeb, you apparently added an ambiguous link to kampong within picture caption

Portrait of Gotfried Coenraad Ernst van Daalen and Dutch troops at a fortified kampong with dead indigenous people

I expect it is easy for you to verify that kampung (an Indonesian and Malaysian word for a hamlet or village), given on the Kampong disambiguation page, is the specific meaning of kampong you meant, though I am not completely sure so I hesitate to make the change myself.

You could see the remaining unfixed ambiguous links you have recently created in this report about editors, where you have the "honor" of appearing second or third (with 20 items, possibly lower after some fixes done by me): you have created more ambiguous links than almost anyone else recently. :) And there is a convenient "FIX" link next to each of those, which allows you to use a "DabSolver" tool to easily select which more precise term is what you meant, easily done if you know yourself and if the corresponding disambiguation page contains the option. (Sometimes/often the disambiguation page does not, and then "fixing" involves either de-linking or adding the missing item to the dab page. For example, I recently added Richard Powell (actor born 1896) redlink to Richard Powell disambiguation page, to fix a dablink created by a different editor.) Could you possibly please take a look at this and see if you could fix at least some of these? Either way, keep up the good work! cheers, --do ncr am 18:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doncram. Thank you for your message and suggestions. Surprisingly there is not an article on kampong/ kampung. The disambiguation page gives the general usage definition. Kampung redirects to a section of an article on villages. I'm not sure in this case that it is actually more useful. And article noting the general usage but specifying the village architecture and traditions associated would be more useful but is a substantial undertaking. I fear if I launched it I would be criticized. I am most familiar with the kampongs of Sumatra, but even there the variety is somewhat substantial as I am not prepared to invest the time needed to do it properly. It's an interesting subject but more complicated than I am prepared to tackle, at least for the moment.

In some of the other cases the issue is complicated because what a place name referred to in the 19th century is not the same as what the name refers to today, or at least it's not clear which municipal designation is equivalent.. If XYZ was a locality and is now part of a regency, a district and a city a;; of the same name, which do I target the link to? In some cases I actually think the disambiguation page is the most useful link.

I will try to limit my links to dablinks and target them as best I can. Thanks for the handy tool. I checked it out (unfortunately for the link from in the Palace Theater arcticle I wasn't sure which actor was the intended target so I couldn't fix) but I will see what I can do on some others. 19:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Another example is Kediri which you targeted to Kediri, Java. That seems reasonable to me but I am not sure if the Kediri residency is more appropriately targeted to the Kediri Regency. On the other hand I don't know if that's accurate either so I guess I was okay with some ambiguity. The place names are related so there is overlap.. As far as I'm concerned tageting either way or to the disambiguation page (where the reader can decide for themselves) are all reasonable outcomes. But I suppose the consensus is that no links can be to disambiguation pages? I don't know. If I can't make a link more useful by targeting it to particulare page I can leave it unlinked but I don't know what else to do.. OrganicEarth (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your thoughtful response. I appreciate that you've considered disambiguating in some of these cases...I guess I thought it would be easy for you to make choices in these areas but that's not the case. (In some other areas it can be very easy to select which person out of several having the same name is the one intended, e.g. the rugby player vs. the politician, or the 1962 film vs. the 2005 film of the same name.) About Kampong and Kampung, i see that the former is a dab page. And the latter is a redirect to a section in an article, which can be fine....it is not necessary to create a separate article on a topic if the treatment in one section of an article is okay. To fix up the treatment of the topics would involve editing at several articles I gather, and it can be messy arranging for mergers or splits or whatever. So I agree there are complex considerations in general about where one's Wikipedia editing efforts are best directed. Don't take me as criticising you; if there does not seem to be easy contributions to make in this way, then don't worry about it.

Your comment about my having made a disambiguation choice for the Kediri term at some article or another, brings up a new idea though: maybe you as an article author want to make the disambiguation choices, rather than leave them open to someone else less informed. The disambiguating done by others like me has effect on the articles you create or develop, because the disambiguating changes the meaning that readers understand. So, for example, perhaps it would be better for you to link to BOTH Kediri, Java and Kediri Regency in your article directly, rather than linking to the dab page, so you control the experience for readers. Because there are a lot of editors working now within wp:DPL's "Monthly challenge" process and otherwise to do the disambiguating wikipedia-wide. I would not say that linking to disambiguation pages is disallowed, because it is not, but the disambiguating crowd is acting like it is, with some exceptions: explicit links to disambiguation pages in See also sections, for example, are fine, e.g. "See also: Kampong (disambiguation)". In that construction the reader is informed that they'll go to a dab page if they click on it. Anyhow when I and others are disambiguating, we make our best guess whether to:

change the link to point to one of the possibilities on a dab page
or to de-link,
or to make the link explicit (i.e. change "kampong" to "Kampong (disambiguation)",
or to ourselves add another option to the disambiguation page (which takes some work),
or to propose that the disambiguation page itself be converted to a regular article, per wp:DABCONCEPT, by tagging with {{dabprimary}}
or to go ahead ourselves and do such a conversion, done well or poorly. (For example, I just did such a conversion for the page cantor, because I saw the multiple options given as related and deserving of an overall treatment. And I checked all the incoming links that were to the dab page, to make sure they made sense going to the revised article, which they did.)

I think that is all of the possibilities.

Anyhow I think it's just good for you to know a bit about what is going on, to be informed in continuing to do what you do. Keep up the good work! Thanks, --do ncr am 21:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you doncram. This information is useful and will help me do a better job of diambiguating going forward. OrganicEarth (talk) 15:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henk Schulte Nordholt (art historian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henk Schulte Nordholt (art historian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henk Schulte Nordholt (art historian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the nominator has withdrawn the nomination, and I've suggested a speedy keep. It would be a good idea if you could find another source or two to anchor the subject's notability. Otherwise someone else may put this up again, or pursue deletion through the current procedure. ∂BusterD (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You know any Ombudsmen?

Hey bro I need an ombudsman you hook me up ? 185.53.128.149 (talk) 05:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump

Just as a heads up, the information you've added twice to the lead of Donald Trump is covered further down in the lead, where it says he is running for president. When other editors are quoting WP:RECENTISM, they don't mean this information shouldn't be in the lead. It just shouldn't be placed in the very first sentence, as including that in addition to the entire paragraph covering this already in the lead provides undue weight to recent events. You also removed the descriptor "politician" from the lead, which has consensus to be included at the talk page. While I certainly encourage you to be WP:BOLD, please also follow the bold, revert, discuss cycle and bring up issues on the talk page after they've been reverted once. Arguing in edit summaries can be perceived as edit warring. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions about anything. I'm watching this talk page, so you can respond here and won't need to ping me. ~ Rob^Talk 05:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob. As per the talk page discussion, what makes him a politician is that he is running for president. It's best to be accurate and to the point. OrganicEarth (talk) 14:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no discussion on the talk page about adding that to the lead, and editors have expressed opposition to it by reverting. Please do not continue to revert without obtaining consensus first. ~ Rob^Talk 14:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Maynard

Hello, Organic Earth. Thank you for adding the maiden name of Hannah Maynard. I am just wondering what is your source for the spelling "Heatherly", as all the sources I've seen, including the BC Archives and Canadian Encyclopedia, spell it "Hatherly". Also, I was pleasantly surprised to see that you created the page Richard Maynard (photographer). I am planning to write a series of articles on early British Columbian photographers. Hannah Maynard was my first effort. I'm hoping to work on the article Richard Maynard in about a month's time after I receive an important source by David Mattison in the mail. Regards, Curiocurio (talk) 11:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curiocurio. The Hannah Maynard article is well done and I was happy to find it. You seem to be correct on the spelling of her maiden/ middle name.. I have changed it in the article and on Wikipedia Commons. As it is a maiden name and not a middle name (is that correct?) if your preference is to include it in a different way that's fine also. I look forward to seeing articles on other Canadian photographers as well! :) Have a great weekend. OrganicEarth (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the changes Organic Earth! I'm pretty sure Hatherly is her maiden name rather than her middle name, but maybe her middle name will show up sometime in my researches. User:Curiocurio (talk) 00:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ouse and Deli

Hi OrganicEarth, thank you for thanking me for fixing a link from ambiguous Breteuil to specific Breteuil, Oise (not far north of Paris). I put some effort into figuring out the difference vs. Breteuil, Eure (not far to the west of Paris), and fixed a number of ambiguous links, not at all relating that to you.

I hope you don't mind: I come back to your ambiguous links because now you're at top of the list of editors who recently added ambiguous links, and I wonder if you could go along with one change of practice that could change some of them. Specifically your usage of "Deli" twice at Charles J. Kleingrothe article puzzled me, i wondered if you meant delicatessen or had a typo for Delhi or what. Nothing on the Deli dab page looks good. But when I google I find there is a tobacco company, and it even has a historical timeline and more about Deli, at "www.fundinguniverse.com", and it is certainly Wikipedia-notable. So thanks, actually, for calling attention to the fact by creating the link, much like a redlink, and "Redlinks help the encyclopedia grow."

But, a suggestion: "Deli" is too common a name for the tobacco company article to get as its title, and it should be at something like Deli (tobacco) or Deli, Inc. or Deli (Malaysia). After trying a little to find any Wikipedia article about it, which you no doubt did, I would pick a plausible name and use that, i.e. put in it in as [[Deli (tobacco company)]] say. Someone else might come along later and create its article at Deli, Inc. and not be aware of your usage. What would be better is to convey to others that there is some usage of [[Deli (tobacco company)]]<nowiki/>, by putting it in the disambiguation page. Redlinks can and should be added to disambiguation pages, maybe you don't know that. They just need to have a supporting bluelink which uses the term in context. What would be technically correct would be for you to add a line like: <nowiki>[[Deli (tobacco company)]], for which one consumer was [[Charles J. Kleingrothe]]
That seems odd because Kleingrothe's association with Deli is obscure, but it meets the rules for redlinks on dab pages (which are at MOS:DABRL). And then when someone creates "Deli, Inc" article they will know to look for articles that link to Deli (tobacco company) (you can see any others by clicking on the redlink to open an edit window, and then hitting "what links here". They might go to those articles and modify them. At a minimum they will create a redirect from your redlink to the new company article. I don't know what you know or not, and hope this is helpful. To be didactic, could you do something like that for your Deli usage, so it goes off of disambiguators' lists? If not, no problem, you have to make choices and someone else will get around to adding some version of "Deli" to the disambiguation page eventually. But I hope it is useful to know how to do it. Please don't simply unlink your usage just to get out of view; it is certainly better for everyone to have all of your links to dab pages than not. :) Keep up the good work again, cheers, --do ncr am 17:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doncram. Why didn't you leave the link as Breteuil, Oise as opposed to targeting it just as Breteuil and hiding Oise? Thanks for sorting that bit out.

As far as Deli, yes, the company is the ideal target. I couldn't tell whether it was notable or not. It seems to have been named for the region? And on the disambig page I believe here is a link to the Sultanate (which I believe probably existed before the Dutch East Indies and perhaps during) and then there is the Deli Regency, which likely came into being after. Redirecting a company to an area seems problematic, but I guess I thought there was some utility in pointing to these areas.. Not ideal certainly. If you think the tobacco company is notable I am happy with that solution. My impression is that editors here tend not to like articles on defunct companies, but I think it's an unfortunate bias. Thanks for all your help!

Dutch WIkipedia has an article on the company here and it does seem to be quite notable based on the Google Books sources I looked into.. OrganicEarth (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are you working on? Anything interesting? Apropos of nothing I am troubled that I can't access the primary source for Carter W. Clarke's quote on the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan. It's such a provocative quote and it seems to be fairly widely reported in what appear to me to be fairly reliable sources, but I would be much happier if I could read the actual interview and see what was actually said in context. I feat that the quote may not be entirely accurate or that the context may put it in a different light, but maybe I'm just paranoid. I like things to be correct and don't want to contribute to a meme that may be at least partially false. I posted a link on the article talk page and I suppose it should be possible to get the library to help establish the veracity of the quote and put forth the interview or at least broader context to that comment.. An yway.. Have a great weekend. OrganicEarth (talk) 05:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jacob Theodoor Cremer

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. OrganicEarth, thanks for creating Jacob Theodoor Cremer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Topeng

added links pointing to Kediri and Panji

Balinese theatre

added a link pointing to Dalang

Donggala Regency

added a link pointing to Kampong

Jacob Nienhuys

added a link pointing to Abraham Salm

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kampong (village)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kampong (village), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://roslank.blogspot.com/2009/02/where-is-my-kampung.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I started the article with content from the Village article (as I noted in my edit summary), so content that is similar is likely a mirror of our existing article. OrganicEarth (talk) 14:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Airmadidi

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. OrganicEarth, thanks for creating Airmadidi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jester may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Pakubuwono II]], 1727 — 1749 (Kar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bunuraja

Hello OrganicEarth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bunuraja for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Snowycats (talk) 01:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Padung (earring)

Hello OrganicEarth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Padung (earring) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jeblat (talk) 03:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding of photos

Hi OrganicEarth, I've noticed that you've been adding a lot of photos in some of the articles, and user Fountains of Bryn Mawr have raised the same issue with you before. Some of these articles are rather short and adding too much photos overwhelms it, while some articles are already filled with photos in every sub-topics. Photos that belonged to certain ethnic groups have been categorized in Wikimedia Common, and there are links to those photo galleries given at the bottom of article itself for readers who are interested to see more of them. I agree that "a critical and distinguishing cultural aspect of these people" "Needs more coverage" but I also feel that "essential pictures critical to a full understanding of the culture and practices" alone is not enough without accompanying explanation, content and references/citations. However, it would be helpful if you can expand those articles with citation and then include photos related to the sub-topic under its sub-topic title.

Besides that, I've also noticed that you've been creating several articles that are not to the standards of Wikipedia articles. Please use the Wikipedia:Articles for creation to help you to have your articles check for approval.Jeblat (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bali Chronicles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bali Chronicles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bali Chronicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Westroopnerd (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Willard A. Hanna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Willard A. Hanna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Westroopnerd (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung page, your edit caused a wikilink error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Batavia, Dutch East Indies

added a link pointing to Gelgel

Bunuraja

added a link pointing to Kampong

Des Alwi

added a link pointing to Sarah Ferguson

Fatahillah Square

added a link pointing to Kota

Jambi

added a link pointing to Muaro Jambi

Tassilo Adam

added a link pointing to James Butler

Willard A. Hanna

added a link pointing to Maluku

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement of Batavia-related article

Thanks for all the improvements in the Batavia-related article. I have to watch some edit though: it's best not to replace the first picture of List of colonial buildings and structures in Jakarta as it is one of the few pic that shows the original city of Jayakarta before its complete eradication into Batavia. Thus, I have reverted that particular edit. I really appreciate how you decided to create article for each of the buildings in the List of colonial buildings and structures in Jakarta article. Try not to leave red links though, so create the article as soon as possible!

Also, in my opinion, I prefer to merge the article Batavia, Dutch East Indies into History of Jakarta; although I'm not very sure as of now, but let's see how the other Wiki users think about it (I am about 60% prefer to merge it back with History of Jakarta and have you improve that article instead of copy pasting all into a new article.--Rochelimit (talk) 17:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isaäc Dignus Fransen van de Putte

Hi, OrganicEarth! I've seen you create a lot of quality new articles lately, so thanks for that. This specifically pertains to your new article Franssen van de Putten. It's a fantastic article, but an article for van de Putte already exists at Isaäc Dignus Fransen van de Putte. It would be fantastic if you could merge your new article into the existent article. Thanks! Westroopnerd (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. I was actually wanting to create an article on the ship.. Will try to sort it all out.. OrganicEarth (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my apologies (lol). Feel free to disregard the merge template. Westroopnerd (talk) 23:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. It was helpful that you found the existing article. I didn't see it. Thanks. OrganicEarth (talk) 23:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your prolific creation of articles on the Dutch East Indies. Keep on truckin'! Westroopnerd (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! Do you by any chance speak Dutch and / or Indonesian? OrganicEarth (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, why would you suspect that? Westroopnerd (talk) 23:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Westroop sounds Dutch? OrganicEarth (talk) 01:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pakubuwono I

FYI... you created a redirect to itself. Bgwhite (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm.. That is problematic. I assumed some sort of formatting issue needed redirecting to the page and that's why there was a redlink.. but I see there actually isn't one.. And yet several pages have links to it: links to it. I have redirected to the page Pakubuwono, but I don't see any note on a Pakubuwono I so I'm not sure what that means.. OrganicEarth (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hi! Rochelimit and I are having a small discussion about your re-creation of the Batavia, Dutch East Indies article. I'd appreciate it if you could give your opinion there too. - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bandung Geological Museum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bandung Geological Museum, OrganicEarth!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add Reliable sources to help expand and improve the article.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Article tagged {{notability|date=August 2015}}; please see WP:N for guidance on article referencing. FeatherPluma (talk) 21:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jakarta is a Province of Indonesia

Hello Mr. OrganicEarth, Excuse me, but i need to know something about you.

Are you an indonesia citizen? or do you live in Jakarta?

Sorry if i am little bit curious But you know that my edit about Jakarta is true, I am dissapointed about your revision.

Jakarta is headed by a governor (like other provinces) and not a mayor

Jakarta consists of five cities (Central Jakarta, East Jakarta, North Jakarta, West Jakarta and South Jakarta) and a regency (Kepulauan Seribu)

No one doubt about these facts. though Indonesians call it as a city, that is a false information and a misconception about what Jakarta really is, I need to fix this ambiguity, so i will not let people misled.

I need your understanding.

Thank You for your attention - MusiNInvincible 06:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusenInvincible (talk • contribs)

Kantor ledeng

Hi OrganicEarth. I noticed you created the Kantor ledeng page with nothing but a link to Palembang Water Tower, so I turned it into a redirect to that article. I think that's what you intended to do, but I wanted to make sure. Regards, Mz7 (talk) 04:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, yes. Thank you very much. OrganicEarth (talk) 04:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.

Mz7 (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture of Bogor

Hi, OrganicEarth; I see you are actively working on Architecture of Bogor. You may have plans to enhance the notability. However, at present, the single reference does not meet the necessary threshold for article notability requirements. Accordingly, there is a question as to the article's notability. Unless adequate referencing is available, the present content would seem to be better placed in a Wikimedia Commons Gallery or Wikimedia Commons category. Do you have and do you plan to add references that meet the notability threshold, which is available for review at WP:N ? Thanks. FeatherPluma (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the article needs a broader scope. OrganicEarth (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Batavia, Dutch East Indies

Hi, OrganicEarth; You added text to Batavia, Dutch East Indies. "In 1920, Tjokroaminoto and Agus Salim set up a committee in Batavia to support the Ottoman caliphate." Your input on the article's Talk page is requested, thank you. FeatherPluma (talk) 19:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Discrimination against Chinese Indonesians

added a link pointing to Pontianak

Harmony Society, Batavia

added a link pointing to Neoclassical

Hat Yai Junction Railway Station

added a link pointing to Yala

Medan

added a link pointing to Sri Mariamman Temple

Medan Post Office

added a link pointing to Grand Mosque

Mergui Road

added a link pointing to Tenasserim

The Chinese in Indonesia

added a link pointing to Javanese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For your info

You just created a redirect link to Sumpter, Oregon via Sumpter Vallley ... unfortunately, the word "valley" is misspelled in the page title.--Orygun (talk) 04:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carl Schlieper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carl Schlieper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 16:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy, you might want to give article creators a little time before slapping speedy deletion tags on their creations. OrganicEarth (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not finished with an article, you should keep it at your sandbox or a draft until you're done. Articles in the namespace do qualify for deletion, even if you're not "done" with them. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 18:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And if you decide to go ahead an create them in the mainspace anyway, please add {{new page}} to the top. I don't check each page to see if you created it, that's a waste of time. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 18:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Colonial Exhibition of Semarang

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Colonial Exhibition of Semarang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 18:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Recently you changed Oregon Lumber Company and Interwiki linked Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I wanted to let you know I have change that Interwiki link. I just thought I would share why, so that in the future you could avoid some of the very common mistake I see all the time, when it comes the name of the LDS Church.

Per WP:The and Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the name of the LDS Church in Utah, for all articles after the 1844 "Succession Crisis", is spelled and Interwiki link as "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints". Please notice that the word The is included and capitalized.--- ARTEST4ECHO^(Talk) 18:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of F.J. Fuchs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on F.J. Fuchs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 18:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of new articles with few categorization, no talk page, spelling issues, and lack of proper referencing

Hi OrganicEarth, while I appreciate many of your additions in Indonesian-related articles, most of them look like a stub, with no well-established element for a new article (no talk page, no categorization, no coordinates, no infobox, spelling issues, poor reference, etc.). Make your time to create a good quality article rather than small stubs, risking them into deletion. So be careful about these. Also be mindful that Wikipedia is not a gallery, you can instead put a commons category button to link to all related photos.--Rochelimit (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Suriname

added links pointing to Fort Zeelandia and Caribs

F.J. Fuchs

added a link pointing to Harness

Garden of Palms

added a link pointing to Capuchin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ohannes Kurkdjian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queen Wilhelmina and Armenian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Torarica Group

The article Torarica Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. No coverage in independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 09:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morse * Marshall

The article Morse * Marshall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources and no indication why the school is notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serajoedal Stoomtram Maatschappi

Could you expand the article? As written it fails WP:GNG and may be deleted. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Academia de Dibujo y Pintura

The article Academia de Dibujo y Pintura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Effectively a DAB page for four different institutes of the same name in four different countries, but none of them appear to be notable enough for their own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 22:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PT Perusahaan Perkebunan London Sumatra Indonesia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PT Perusahaan Perkebunan London Sumatra Indonesia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PT Perusahaan Perkebunan London Sumatra Indonesia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Opal|zukor^(discuss) 22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henri Conneau

The article Henri Conneau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]