User talk:ElijahPepe

April 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

In the last ten minutes you've made two edits to The New York Times, the first removing 48k from the page and the second removing 33k from the page, neither of which were with edit summaries. You have been warned repeatedly for this before. If you make any more edits to The New York Times or its child articles without using an edit summary, I will be bringing you to a behavioural noticeboard. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Sideswipe9th--you just beat me to it. I was also wondering whether to just hit rollback on those huge changes. Is this editor of good faith? Are they improving the article? I remember having looked at this before, and I think you've pinged me from the talk page at some point--but what I also see is significant pushback against their comments and edits. (FWIW I think the article is inflated and needs pruning, but that's another matter.) Drmies (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Drmies: it's really hard to tell. From a skim Elijah has removed at least 80k of sources from the article in the last ten minutes. Now it's possible these sources were unused in the article body, in which case these edits would be an improvement, but without a substantial time investment to verify each one by hand due to the lack of justification in an edit summary it's nigh-on impossible to tell. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

That said, given Elijah's laundry list of issues with this article and its sub-articles, including recently changing the scope of one of the history of articles, and then creating another one, against the pre-existing consensus that Elijah contributed to, it's really hard to consider Elijah's edits in good faith here. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Removing unused references is not in good faith, apparently. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Is this editor of good faith? Are they improving the article? I remember having looked at this before, and I think you've pinged me from the talk page at some point--but what I also see is significant pushback against their comments and edits. I think I may have pinged you before, @Drmies. But we've repeatedly circled around the same thing for the last couple months. Elijah makes edits without consensus or summaries, people discuss, elijah ignores it/promises to fix things. Repeat the cycle N days later.

I'm currently quite burnt out on this article, but it's impossible to make any progress with things when this keeps happening. Last time landed us in ANI with no actual changes. So we had a full consensus of "These are options for how to split article, please discuss" to not repeat that. A few weeks later, Elijah again ignores the decision to do his own thing (for presumably GA credits).

At this point, does good faith matter if they're very clearly making things worse for every other editor? I genuinely do not know. I do know that I'm all out of patience for Elijah's antics. Soni (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Rest assured that I won't edit the Times article if making beneficial changes warrants a noticeboard. I planned on expanding a few sections today; that clearly won't be happening.elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Elijah, without an edit summary we don't know this edit is beneficial. How do we distinguish this from someone blanking an article or article sections? Do you know how long it takes to read through multiple diffs of this length? You have been warned on this multiple times, by multiple editors. Why are you not using edit summaries? Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Never had to use them before. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

You have been warned before. I don't know why you would think you can make truly massive edits without explaining; surely you've noticed that this is a collaborative project. And you are still not explaining what you are doing--Sideswipe9th, if you want to roll these back, go for it. I have no clue why they removed those sources. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I can't even make edits that have nothing to do with content to remove references that weren't used and added size to the article, the exact issue everyone is attempting to resolve. Stopping others from doing their work is not beneficial. I'm disappointed that I couldn't expand the article and that it will likely remain in its state for months, if not years. If everyone is pressuring me to quit editing altogether—attempting to get me blocked—maybe I should consider that option. I've already stated that the work there is no longer mine. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I've been following this on-and-off since I saw you were working on improving the article for The New York Times, and I hope you understand that no one here wants to chase you away from editing about The Times, or from the project entirely. The issue is your attitude towards collaboration in general, and it's manifested here because this is an article many people care about. If you use edit summaries and engage substantively in discussion when challenged, there won't be any sort of problem. Please, please, just listen to other people when they give you feedback about your edits. The community is not out to get you; we just want to collaborate. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Drmies: I honestly dunno. If they are actually unused references, then removing them is fine. But the underlying behavioural problems here, ignoring consensus, ignoring the reasons why he was repeatedly warned and blocked previously, those need some sort of admin response I feel. All of this, my warning, your talk page discussion, could have been entirely avoided if Elijah had done what he was supposed to do, and used an edit summary with each of those edits. Something that he knows or should know he should be doing, because he's been blocked before for not using them. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

As you well know, you were warned for this exact behaviour at the start of February, the article was then fully protected for a week because you continued to do this and edit war, and you were then blocked at the end of February for the same behaviour. Saying you've never had to use them before is frankly insulting to all of us here, given your recent behavioural history on this article. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Looks like you're still not using edit summaries in most of your edits. Is there a reason for that? -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Proposed merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media

The article Proposed merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, especially without having actually happened.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 23:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Next UK election

I undid the speedy deletion solely because I believe it to be too controversial considering the opposition to blanking/redirecting it. Noah, BSBA^Talk 12:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Rather than resolving this in a few hours, this will now take a week. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 12:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Christian theology...

Hi. I saw your piece on Christian theology in the US, tying together the Louisiana and Oklahoma situations. I think you are on the right track with this, please do flesh it out and keep building. Best regards, —tim //// Carrite (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Premature. Content should be added to main articles and split when appropriate.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reywas92^Talk 15:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

False titles

The sentence "the former United States president Donald Trump" is grammatically correct. If it were not the sentence "the American television show The Walking Dead" would also be grammatically incorrect. Clearly it is not; it is a perfectly ordinary sentence.

I encourage you to read about false titles and journalese. Wikipedia is not an American news website; we do not use false titles and shorthands to sensationalise the content of an article. It is also not a newspaper; we do not use them to save space, either.

All the best. Keeper of Albion (talk) 11:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ruth Westheimer

On 15 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ruth Westheimer, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Biden crisis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biden crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biden crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 13:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 01:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Withdrawal of Joe Biden from the 2024 United States presidential election (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Qwirkle (talk) 04:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

"Biden crisis" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Biden crisis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § Biden crisis until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Response to the 2024 Venezuelan presidential election moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Response to the 2024 Venezuelan presidential election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Death of Ismail Haniyeh has been moved

Hey! Just telling you here that Death of Ismail Haniyeh, a page you made, has been merged with Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh as both articles were created at the same time, simply because the later was bigger. Have a good day! win8x (talking | spying) 03:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

The article was not larger and the title is not what it should be at the moment without any other reporting. This was very improper. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

1RR at Killing of Ismail Haniyeh

Hello. Please note that Killing of Ismail Haniyeh is subject to 1RR, as it is within the scope of WP:PIA.

You are currently at 2 reverts within the past 24 hours:

1. 03:33, 31 July 2024 (reverts this edit)

1. 03:46, 31 July 2024 (reverts this edit)

I understand that articles on rapidly developing events can be chaotic and can lead to back-and-forth reverting at rates that are higher than typical for stable articles. However, please keep in mind that this sort of thing is a bit more strictly handled in the Arab-Israeli conflict area than it is in other areas.

Cheers,

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I explained both edits. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Yes. That being said, they are still reverts even if they are explained. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Killing of Ismail Haniyeh

On 31 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Killing of Ismail Haniyeh, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 12:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Petteway v. Galveston County. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Generally speaking, summarizing court opinions is OR because it involves interpreting the meaning of particular holdings. You should find reliable sources that summarize the holding of the case, of which there are many.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2024 stock market decline

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2024 stock market decline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — ♠ Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 14:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2024 Al-Asad Airbase attack

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Al-Asad Airbase attack, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 stock market decline for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 stock market decline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 stock market decline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- zzuuzz ^(talk) 06:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

2024 stock market decline

Hello, ElijahPepe,

Please do not create all of these articles that are just a blip on the nightly news. They seem to get tagged for an AFD discussion within a day and many of them are deleted. It's a waste of editors' time debating them. Have a better filter and only create articles on events that have lasting significance. That typically takes more than a few hours or a day to determine this. You aren't getting bonus points from creating these articles so quickly, in fact, it is damaging your reputation if the current AFD is any indication. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@Liz This pattern does not seem to slow down yet - I see yet another example of an article with unclear notability and a single source that Elijah created way before time. Soni (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

And I have used the draftspace where appropriate since this comment. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

You published a one line article about Mexican judicial reform way after this comment. Esolo5002 (talk) 03:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

indeed it's still happening: #2024 Zamfara State boat accident moved to draftspace ... sawyer * he/they * talk 00:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1945–1998)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of The New York Times (1945–1998) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lisha2037 -- Lisha2037 (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1945–1998)

The article History of The New York Times (1945–1998) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:History of The New York Times (1945–1998) for comments about the article, and Talk:History of The New York Times (1945–1998)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lisha2037 -- Lisha2037 (talk) 21:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of FTC v. Microsoft

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article FTC v. Microsoft you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 20:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Petteway v. Galveston County for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petteway v. Galveston County is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petteway v. Galveston County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TarnishedPath^talk 13:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Canada railway shutdown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Canada railway shutdown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Canada railway shutdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 19:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of FTC v. Microsoft

The article FTC v. Microsoft you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:FTC v. Microsoft for comments about the article, and Talk:FTC v. Microsoft/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 03:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Mexican judicial reform for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Mexican judicial reform is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Mexican judicial reform until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Esolo5002 (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

2024 Zamfara State boat accident moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Zamfara State boat accident. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. IntentionallyDense (talk) 23:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Trump International Golf Club shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump International Golf Club shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Golf Club shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 21:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Succession of Rupert Murdoch

Hello ElijahPepe,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Succession of Rupert Murdoch for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Succession of Rupert Murdoch to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

harrz ^talk 22:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2024 Mexican judicial reform

On 18 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Mexican judicial reform, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 08:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2024 Israeli ground operation in Lebanon. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2024 Israeli ground operation in Lebanon. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 19:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Israel–Hezbollah war for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Israel–Hezbollah war is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Israel–Hezbollah war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Triggerhippie4 (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2024 Israel–Hezbollah war

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Israel–Hezbollah war. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Elijah, seriously, come on dude. stop making current events articles without doing even the bare minimum to check whether it's a duplicate/CFORK or even notable. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 17:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2024 University of California academic workers' strike

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 University of California academic workers' strike, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024 Israeli retaliation against Iran

Hi! I saw the article October 2024 Israeli retaliation against Iran you created in the New Pages Queue. As it is for now only speculation about what Israel might do in retaliation, I'm afraid it would fall under WP:CRYSTAL and be a bit too soon for an article to be created before it actually happens. Thanks for your understanding! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2024 Cuban blackout

The article 2024 Cuban blackout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One-sentence article about a current event, WP:NOTNEWS applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CoconutOctopus talk 20:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Tesla Network

You are the crator of the article Tesla Network. I subsequently added content and attempted to improve that article. The article has now been AfD'd for potential merging into Tesla Cybercab.

I am not expert on this, but I am pretty sure Tesla has been talking about this "network" and their own ride-hailing service—that would be exclusive/proprietary to them for Tesla vehicles using Tesla self-driving software—for some years now. I would expect that there are references to this in old quarterly calls, or in one or more of the "investor days" or "battery days" that they've held as public events.

So if you want the article to remain, you may want to find some of those sources and improve the Tesla Network article with a fuller/richer and longer history of the concept, and with more sources talking about it. Cheers. N2e (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I want to be careful about what I say. However, I can state that Tesla is working on a ride-hailing service that is intended to be integrated into the app. Musk has mentioned this several times, including his second Master Plan. The plan is to have a fleet of vehicles, including existing models, that can autonomously function as Ubers. As far as I know, "Tesla Network" is a placeholder name. I'm not against merging the article because the topic has no coverage, but I created it in order to maintain an article about the Robovan. I am aware that specific details about Tesla's network have been publicly stated. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 04:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm not against merging the article because the topic has no coverage, but I created it in order to maintain an article about the Robovan. a) you shouldn't create articles on topics with no coverage. b) what do you mean you "created it in order to maintain an article about the Robovan"? you've already created a separate article about the Tesla Robovan, which is a two-sentence stub that doesn't at all demonstrate notability. once again i'm going to ask you to stop making articles about current events (and future events) with no indication of any lasting significance. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 15:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I didn't create the article on the Robovan. I created a redirect that Bdebbarma converted into an article, which I disagree with. I created Tesla Network to have an article to include information about the Robovan as part of the fleet of Tesla robotaxis. At the time, I believed that there was more to discuss—in other words, information about the Tesla Network would emerge. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

apologies for assuming you made the article about the Robovan. however, the rest of my comment stands - please just use draftspace. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 15:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

It seems reasonable enough here to redirect Tesla Network and merge Tesla Robovan into Tesla Inc. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 20:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2024 Houston helicopter crash

The article 2024 Houston helicopter crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Accidents are not inherently notable, per WP:EVENTCRIT #4.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2024 Cuba blackouts

On 30 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Cuba blackouts, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Esolo5002 (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Sean Combs sexual misconduct allegations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Combs sexual misconduct allegations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Combs sexual misconduct allegations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

"1996 in California" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1996 in California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § 1996 in California until a consensus is reached. HertzDonuts (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Antonio Guiteras Power Plant. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2025–2026 U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025–2026 U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025–2026 U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Esolo5002 (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Topic ban

Per unanimous consensus at ANI, you are topic banned from creating new articles in mainspace for six months. You may submit new articles through the articles for creation process. charlotte ^👸♥ 18:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

@Queen of Hearts: Looking at this AfD nomination from 7 November 2024, I think ElijahPepe may have drawn the wrong conclusions from that ANI discussion? Renerpho (talk) 11:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

No, that comment was sarcastic. If you're looking to chastise me further, you'll have to look elsewhere. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Jamieson Greer. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a wonderful and blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Tesla Robovan. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a wonderful and blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Next United Kingdom general election

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Next United Kingdom general election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 University of Mississippi confrontation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 University of Mississippi confrontation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 University of Mississippi confrontation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jordano⁵³ 22:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Hello, I'm The void century. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The void century 18:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi @ElijahPepe, I don't want to template a regular, so I'll just note here that moves against consensus (as found in the talk page at Talk: Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case)) are generally not allowed, once a discussion results in a move, we must have another discussion to move any articles involved. I'm sure you know this, just wanted to make sure I said something! When moving potentially contentious topics, I recommend a scroll through the talk page and archives for any closed RM's, usually denoted by a green box (older moves may be colored differently) ASUKITE 18:16, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Wrong template to use. I moved the page because it was incorrect; Jack Smith had dismissed his prosecution against Trump but continued it against the two defendants. It was a good-faith move. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm not disputing that it was, that's a valid reason to move the article, however as the article in question is a contentious topic, which had a discussion to move it last year, moving it to another title without another discussion is likely to result in move-warring, which it did in this case as somebody moved it right after you. I don't like undoing somebody else's work without at least reaching out to them, so I did.

I would suggest opening a discussion at WP:RM, providing your rationale, and hopefully the community will agree and the title can be changed. ASUKITE 19:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@ElijahPepe You've been here for years. You're familiar with the process of how page moves work. Unilaterally moving a page, and especially a consensus-titled one that's significant to national politics, when you're already topic banned from creating new pages, is bad faith. Sorry, your move was vandalism, and if I didn't call a spade a spade, it would be a disservice to Wikipedia. The void century 19:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

No. Moving an article to a correct title is not vandalism. I believed it was an uncontroversial move and Antony-22 moved it to a better title. There was no issue because Trump had been removed from the case and as such the circumstance of the article changed. The title I chose lasted for about ten minutes before Antony-22 moved it. Why didn't you send this notice to him? It was not a deliberate effort to "obstruct or defeat the project's purpose" when I moved the page to reflect what had just occurred so that the title was not erroneous. Re-read WP:NOTV. Boldly moving an article that is "inconsistent with prior consensus" is acceptable, particularly when prior consensus is no longer applicable. I found Antony-22's title much better, end of story. If his or my moves were improper, fine, but do not accuse people of vandalism without clear evidence. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 20:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

If you think there's a good case for a move, please request one on the article's talk page. The void century 20:25, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Also to ElijahPepe - my apologies for putting my message under the wrong heading, I should have created a new one, our signatures are even the same color! ASUKITE 22:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@Asukite and The void century: Just wanted to chime in. I agree with ElijahPepe that, since the RM was nearly a year and a half ago, and changing circumstances since then have made the current title arguably incorrect (now that Trump has been removed from the prosecution), a bold move was proper. Reverting it was also proper under WP:BRD, though I don't think it's appropriate to describe this specific situation as vandalism or move-warring. The next step is to discuss on the article talk page. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 02:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I second this. Making a bold move is perfectly correct, reverting it was fine too. It certainly wasn't vandalism, which implies intentional malice. Esolo5002 (talk) 02:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Thirded. Accusing someone of vandalism for a good faith, bold action, which is easily reverted or improved upon, when you disagree with it isn't what calling a spade a spade is about. That's not being blunt, that's being rude. DarmaniLink (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

@Antony-22 Maybe as an isolated incident it wouldn't be a concern, but ElijahPepe is currently banned from creating new articles, has a history of contentious editing and around 80% edits without a summary. As Soni said in the discussion at the top of this talk page Elijah makes edits without consensus or summaries, people discuss, elijah ignores it/promises to fix things. Repeat the cycle N days later. There's a long-running pattern of behavior that indicates an intent to ignore consensus, which is disruptive to the platform. It's a time sink to other editors, and yes it's vandalism. The void century 07:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:VD

On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge

and

Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism.

Please strike those accusations out, this is the kind of stuff that drives people away from the project. DarmaniLink (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:GAME The void century 09:53, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Bashar al-assad

The country of the regime had ended so he is president of what? Now HTS had majority of country. Therealbey (talk) 03:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Personally, I believe that al-Assad is no longer president. However, Wikipedia has to have patience in these sorts of articles. The only indication that al-Assad is no longer president is a Reuters report stating that he has left Damascus. When reliable sources report that the Syrian government has fallen, the article can be updated accordingly. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

heres the source head of the coalition has said to Al Hadith the fall of the regime Therealbey (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I just read the Telegram message. Be patient. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Haha. Ok Therealbey (talk) 03:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Assad

I don't want to get into an edit war, so I'm bringing our discussion here. My issue is that your inclusion of the volatility of his regime at this very moment as well as his current location is not encyclopedic information and doesn't belong in a Wikipedia article. We deal in exact, settled, verifiable information, not constant updates and reports on currently unfolding events. His location doesn't matter until it is confirmed. The state of his regime is already established until it officially falls. Until either of those things, information about either of them is outside of our concern. That's my two cents, at least. I appreciate the work you do, in the end, and I appreciate the in-text notes you left. Anwegmann (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm fine with removing the location information, but al-Assad's state of rule is in dispute and as such the reader should be made aware of that. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

That is fleeting. The reader will need new information in a matter of hours. There is no use in commenting on the state of his regime. Technically, he is still president of Syria. He likely won't be for much longer, but that is not our decision to make. When his overthrow is confirmed, we can add it. Until then, we need to deal in established, verifiable facts, not reporting. Anwegmann (talk) 03:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

His rule is over, according to Syria's army command. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

"Officer says." This is reporting. Please vet your sources more thorough when dealing with a major on-going event. Anwegmann (talk) 04:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes, and I reverted it properly. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 04:01, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Can I know the exact source which can called as confirmed? Like I have added the declaration of the opposition now why you removed? It's from Bigg reliable press. Can you clarify? Therealbey (talk) 05:05, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Standard notice: Syrian Civil War

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:57, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Assad is Gone

Elijah, Syria's Prime Minister has agreed to facilitate a transition of power, and the former Syrian Army has stated that the Assad regime has fell. What more do you need to reach the conclusion that he is no longer President of Syria? Firecat93 (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

The Syrian army is said to have claimed that. I do believe that he is no longer the president of Syria, but Wikipedia can't make the same conclusions yet. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

OK, I understand. I hope that we can make that conclusion soon. Firecat93 (talk) 05:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I would have thought that confirmation from a variety of reliable sources would be adequate. Does Assad himself have to announce that he is no longer President? Omar Bashir never relinquished power, but he was deposed, and he is no longer President of Sudan. Just something to consider. Firecat93 (talk) 05:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Any official source would be fine. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024- large volumes of edits without summary

Hi, I noticed you've recently made large volumes of edits in quick succession without summaries, for example on December 1. If you are using a tool for semi-automated or automated editing, it's customary to leave detailed summaries and indicate which tool you're using, either via hyperlink or tag. Please familiarize yourself with WP:BOTP if you're using a tool. The void century 07:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Tel Aviv truck attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Tel Aviv truck attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Tel Aviv truck attack (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

E_F⁵ 19:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Christian theology and public schools in the United States

Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christian theology and public schools in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergio Gor has been accepted

Sergio Gor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

• For any of the notable Trump appointee drafts that some decent content is added beyond "[Person] is a government official who was appointed by Trump to [position]" – I'm happy to publish for you. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Save America (book)

I thought you were trying to avoid stress. I removed the proposal for deleting because this is likely to be a nuclear level controversy. Please feel free to go to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 04:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Jay Clayton (attorney)

ElijahPepe, it's nice to meet you. I noticed your active involvement on Project:Donald Trump and would appreciate your assistance on the BLP article of Jay Clayton (attorney), President-elect Trump's recent appointment for United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, and his previous appointment for SEC chairman. I have posted my request on the Talk page and would be grateful for your review. My COI with Mr. Clayton as an employee, which I have declared, prevents me from editing the article myself. I value your time; if you approve the changes, I can implement them. Thank you for taking a look, Blackseneca (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Fartcoin

Why did you force a redirect on this article without giving me any notice? I went through Articles for Creation. This article was improved by a third party. You added a specious nomination for speedy deletion under A7 without any further reasoning. I gave you a full explanation and reason for notability on the talk page as per the process. You ignored that. Yet another third party removed the speedy deletion nomination box after that. And yet you ignored all of that and redirected the page without giving me any notice. I had to find out accidentally.

I have undone your revision. If you do this again, I will report you. I am fine with this article being deleted if we go through the standard process and people agree. But just because you seem to have a strong personal opinion, it doesn't give you the right to unilaterally delete it. Aurangzebra (talk) 19:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2024 Magdeburg car attack

On 21 December 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Magdeburg car attack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Miran has been accepted

Stephen Miran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:01, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Chris Wright (energy executive)

On 24 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chris Wright (energy executive), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that energy executive Chris Wright once drank fracking fluid to prove that it was not dangerous? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Wright (energy executive). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chris Wright (energy executive)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)