Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 36: Line 36:
*'''Oppose''' per above (significance). Only a fraction of the entire UAW body is on strike. [[User:Kcmastrpc|Kcmastrpc]] ([[User talk:Kcmastrpc|talk]]) 14:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per above (significance). Only a fraction of the entire UAW body is on strike. [[User:Kcmastrpc|Kcmastrpc]] ([[User talk:Kcmastrpc|talk]]) 14:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' We also posted [[Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/July 2023#(Posted, closed) 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike|the (still-ongoing) SAG-AFTRA strike]] when it began in July. [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 16:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' We also posted [[Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/July 2023#(Posted, closed) 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike|the (still-ongoing) SAG-AFTRA strike]] when it began in July. [[User:Davey2116|Davey2116]] ([[User talk:Davey2116|talk]]) 16:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*:That was massively important for a different reason (the importance of entertainment media in modern people's lives) not to mention it involved more people still. [[User:Daikido|Daikido]] ([[User talk:Daikido|talk]]) 16:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Article well sourced, first trilateral strike against the three automakers in the union's history and per Davey2116. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 16:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Article well sourced, first trilateral strike against the three automakers in the union's history and per Davey2116. --[[User:TDKR Chicago 101|TDKR Chicago 101]] ([[User talk:TDKR Chicago 101|talk]]) 16:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Regardless of employee count, this is a broad-spectrum strike against all "Big Three" US automakers. Unprecedented. I would update Stellantis to say (formerly Fiat Chrysler). [[User:CoatCheck|CoatCheck]] ([[User talk:CoatCheck|talk]]) 16:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Regardless of employee count, this is a broad-spectrum strike against all "Big Three" US automakers. Unprecedented. I would update Stellantis to say (formerly Fiat Chrysler). [[User:CoatCheck|CoatCheck]] ([[User talk:CoatCheck|talk]]) 16:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:58, 15 September 2023

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Jimmy Carter in 1977
Jimmy Carter

Glossary

  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

September 15

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Health and environment

Law and crime


RD: Fernando Botero

Article: Fernando Botero (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP, BBC Mundo
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Colombian artist; unmistakable style in his sculptures and paintings. References with a few gaps, particularly a long list of exhibitions (that could well be deleted for all they add to the article). Moscow Mule (talk) 15:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

United Auto Workers strike

Article: United Auto Workers strike of 2023 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The United Auto Workers announces a strike against Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis after contract negotiations break down. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/14/uaw-strikes-ford-gm-stellantis.html
Credits:

September 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


RD: Lauch Faircloth

Article: Lauch Faircloth (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT The News & Observer
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former US senator from North Carolina, most notable for his opposition to D.C. home rule and for losing to John Edwards. Article needs significant work. Curbon7 (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scattered Spider hacks of MGM and Caesars

Articles: Scattered Spider (talk · history · tag) and 2023 MGM IT attack (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A group of British and American hackers known as Scattered Spider hack MGM Resorts and Caesars Entertainment (Post)
Alternative blurb: MGM Resorts and Caesars Entertainment are hacked by the group Scattered Spider
News source(s): https://www.reuters.com/business/caesars-entertainment-paid-heavy-ransom-after-cyberattack-bloomberg-news-2023-09-13/
Credits:

(Removed) Ongoing removal: 2023 Canadian wildfires

Article: 2023 Canadian wildfires (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)

Nominator's comments: Procedural removal, there have been minimal updates to the article in the last two weeks. It seems that the worst is over for the season. --Tone 19:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per nominator. For a formal issue (lack of updating or daily continuity in them) and for a substantive issue (it has ceased to be notorious, with no more international attention). _-_Alsor (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. From CIFFC, "only" a little under a hundred wildfires each of the last two weeks, compared to 400-500 weekly during the peak in July. Chaotic Enby (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Although they are not weighted by affected area (as the last graph shows, that's the main difference between this year and last year while the fire count was roughly the same), so that's a caveat to take into consideration Chaotic Enby (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The area burned per day has hardly changed since before this was posted. Some fluctuations even short backtracks from estimation errors but still almost as fast as ever. [[User:Sagittarian Milky Way|Sagittarian Milky Way]] ([[User talk:Sagittarian Milky Way|talk]]) 22:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC) Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait - still big news here; and the amount of area burning is still immense; even if the numbers of fires are down, and less cities are evacuated. Biggest factor in terms of news coverage, is the wind hasn't been blowing into the USA much recently. The next band of thick smoke hits Chicago on Saturday though, according to the forecast ... Nfitz (talk) 03:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is no longer daily news. It has subsided to the point that it is being treated as all other wildfires in the world - routine matters during the summer months. --Masem (t) 03:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Even the fire is still ongoing in some places, most of the major news sites have stop updating the situation. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 07:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bold Support, pretty stale ~~ ~~ 2A00:23C8:B03:9F01:7436:E482:83CC:93D4 (talk) 13:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) 2023 Hanoi building fire

Article: 2023 Hanoi building fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 56 people were killed after a fire occurred at an apartment building in Hanoi, Vietnam. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Hanoi, Vietnam, a fire at an apartment building kills at least 56 people.
News source(s): Reuters, Al Jazeera.
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: A fire at an apartment building in Hanoi kills at least 56 people. Article needs some work though. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 23:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on quality for now, open to change my vote if the article gets expanded. No comment on notability, although it's pretty horrible to see how many tragedies have happened these last days. Chaotic Enby (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to weak support - no issue about notability and the article has already been expanded quite a bit although still not in perfect shape. But I trust the community on this one! Chaotic Enby (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support on quality obviously, duh, high death toll Daikido (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:ITNCDONT, specifically the first part. High death toll doesn't mean much if the article isn't up to standards. Iamstillqw3rty (talk) 01:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Support on quality"
The article is still a stub??? The Kip 03:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And what do you mean "duh"? Remember that death toll is not the only factor through which significance is measured. We have declined posting events with similarly numbered death tolls before. Duly signed, WaltClipper -(talk) 12:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not to get too into the weeds, but the user in question has a history of semi-disruptive behavior at ITN, so this seems rather typical. The Kip 16:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, just in case my original vote wasn't clear, "quality" was about the state of the article (still a stub back then), not about notability (I mean, it would've been a bit weird to talk about a "high-quality disater"). In any case I edited it since as the article has grown quite a bit! Chaotic Enby (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:Oppose per Enby. Article needs some serious work. Will be happy to support once it's up to par. Iamstillqw3rty (talk) 01:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose on quality per above. The article's a stub with few details. The Kip 03:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: John McDonald

Article: John McDonald (rugby league) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Courier Mail
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Aydoh8 (talk) 23:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jean Boht

Article: Jean Boht (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Mjroots (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Danilo Cavalcante capture

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Danilo Cavalcante (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ After a 14-day manhunt, escaped fugitive Danilo Cavilcante is captured in Pennsylvania. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Danilo Cavalcante, wanted fugitive, is captured in Pennsylvania after a 14-day manhunt.
News source(s): https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/09/13/us/pa-fugitive-captured-danelo-cavalcante
Credits:
 Maximus Pinpoint (talk) 15:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is the right... anything, but I think this is a relatively relevant event. Please tell me if I did something wrong with formatting or anything so I can do it right next time :)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

  • Mali War
    • Tuareg fighters from the Platform coalition of rebels capture the town of Bourem from Malian forces, bringing an end to the 2015 peace treaty between the rebels and the Malian government. (Africanews)

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Closed x 2) Impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An impeachment inquiry investigating U.S. president Joe Biden (pictured) is announced by U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Significant recent/current event/news item. Impeachment inquiries against U.S. presidents are historically uncommon. Out of 46 presidents, only five have been the subject of such inquiries (counting Biden).

SecretName101 (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose at this point, reconsider if some actual vote takes place. Tone 06:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait until actual votes happen for the impeachment Oppose and WP:SNOW close. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 07:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jalapeño Inquiries and impeachments are different phases of an impeachment process. An impeachment inquiry being launched is itself highly notable news SecretName101 (talk) 08:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know, though the inquiry itself happens before the vote, so, in my opinion, we should wait until the votes finish, if there even will be a vote. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 08:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, those are two different occurances. With many subjects, we report on big developments at different stages. For instance, I'm quite confident few said "wait until the general election" when people suggested adding Kamala Harris' selection as a running-mate in 2020. SecretName101 (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose / wait until voting per above. At this moment this looks like digging up dirt magnified by media circus. Brandmeistertalk 08:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What voting? Inquiries can be opened without votes, and this one just was. No vote is planneed.
Again people: You are required to actually READ the content before chiming in. SecretName101 (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose “it is announced” it’s not ITN material and has never been. Close and wait until voting. _-_Alsor (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Once again, have you people been reading the material on inquiries before chiming in?
Because actually doing the reading is required before chiming in. The articles linked to in the blurb would inform you: you do not need to hold a vote for there to be an inquiry. A vote is only needed to impeach, not to launch a preceding inquiry. McCarthy's announcement constitutes the launch of the inquiry. He does not plan on their being a vote, so you are waiting on a non-existent event. SecretName101 (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait - I will support this once a vote actually takes place. Another exciting episode of American politics, time to grab some popcorn PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - we added the impeachment inquiries against Trump in 2019 into Ongoing immediately, before any House votes had taken place, where it remained until the process concluded. Much as I personally think this is a storm in a teacup, and not the most important US news, I am concerned from a NPOV point of view that we might not be treating similar items equally.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See how easy that was?SecretName101 (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add to ongoing - per Amakuru's comment and WP:NPOV, we should post this to ongoing especially since we did the same thing for Trump back in 2019. I would not understand why Trump got special treatment in ITN while Biden did not. Interstellarity (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Might one argue that U.S. presidential impeachments could already be blasé?—Bagumba (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Should we post every impeachment process in every country? We didn't post the two impeachment processes (that failed) against Sebastián Piñera, for example. If we post this, so we should post those in the future. --Bedivere (talk) 12:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Have y'all not read the guidelines at the top of the article? This is a highly discouraged take, and inappropriate grounds for opposition. SecretName101 (talk) 12:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question House Speaker McCarthy directed the House to begin impeachment inquiry without holding a vote authorizing the inquiry. Is it possible that the House will not act on McCarthy's direction? If so, I !novote against this being ITN and wait until an inquiring actually begins. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There is not reason to think that the chairmen of these committees would do such a thing. Anyone who thinks that is utterly unfamiliar with the history and political positions of any of those men. Also, we don't make our decisions off of unlikely "what if" scenerios. SecretName101 (talk) 13:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This was a decision to give a house committee the go-ahead to investigate if there is sufficient evidence for an actual inquiry, whereas the last time in 2019 was after the formal inquiry in front of the full house was started (eg the actual process). In addition to this being just political theater as to try to get the Freedom Caucas to help actually pass the budget and avoid a shutdown. Nearly all reliable sources are downplaying this as the GOP simply playing games as they have nothing tangible to actually impeach Biden over. --Masem (t) 12:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    By this point I think it should be a WP:SNOW close. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 12:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I would argue a SNOW close would be innappropiate, most of the opposition seems to be from people who either evidences not reading the linked articles, or not even reading the guidelines at the top of this very page. If these oppositions were more substantive, yes. But no. SecretName101 (talk) 13:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    No. It was the launch of an inquiry. You seem to be ignoring every reliable news source and the actual words uttered by McCarthy. This is not the place for original research-based assertions SecretName101 (talk) 12:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  • Although I do recognize that WP:ITNSIGNIF holds that only a consensus of users is all that is required in order to determine whether to post or close a nomination, I do strongly believe that this was closed too soon and that the reasons for opposing are not equitable with how ITN has handled prior news items of this sort. Regardless of what any of us here think, this is a major political turning point in the United States, affecting the highest office of the land, and turning our eyes away from it on a matter of wording (Vote? Announcement? Authorization? Directive?) doesn't seem to be in keeping with our usual assessment process. To admins: If you need to remove this comment, please at least copy it to WT:ITN. Duly signed, WaltClipper -(talk) 18:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think this is "a major political turning point". It's a natural escalation based on their months of their investigation committee. It's one step in the process that will likely result in Biden's impeachment, but we're not at the end point yet. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Ready) RD: Román Chalbaud

Article: Román Chalbaud (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): La Vanguardia
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Prominent Venezuelan film maker. NoonIcarus (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TDKR Chicago 101: I tried changing the tense before the nomination, sorry if I missed some. Could you please point out which these currently are? I can't find them. --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MonarchOfTerror: Some of the references about his death include his birth date as well. I'm not sure the biographical sources include this info too, but I have added both said footnote and an additional reference for the full name. --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. I’m willing to support now, of course AGFing Spanish sources. Scientia potentia est, MonarchOfTerror 20:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and ready After checking it. I don't think I quite included everything I wanted when working on it years ago, maybe I'll have to find time now, but article is in great shape. Kingsif (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Mike Williams (wide receiver, born 1987)

Article: Mike Williams (wide receiver, born 1987) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Engineerchange (talk) 18:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who knew there were so many wide receivers in American football named Mike Williams?
Anyways article looks good, Support PrecariousWorlds (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

  • Storm Daniel
    • At least 2,500 people have been killed and 7,000 others are reported missing across northeastern Libya during floods triggered by Storm Daniel. (Albawaba)

International relations

Law and crime


RD: Point Given

Article: Point Given (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/271766/dual-classic-winner-hall-of-famer-point-given-dies
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: 2001 American Horse of the Year. The first horse ever to win four $1 million races in a row. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 12:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, sourcing seems good. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 13:05, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ian Wilmut

Article: Ian Wilmut (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [4]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 -Abhishikt (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Éva Fahidi

Article: Éva Fahidi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [5]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, article has no cleanup tags and everything is backed up by sources. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 07:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Storm Daniel

Proposed image
Article: Storm Daniel (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Storm Daniel causes severe flooding across Libya and the collapse of two dams, leaving more than 2,500 people dead. (Post)
News source(s): [6]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Might need a bit of work but definitely worthy of posting Noah, AATalk 14:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose - Libya declares state of emergency, seems to be causing a lot of damage. However, death toll does not automatically mean notability, and we should not support or oppose based off of it. This item is also getting rather stale. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How is it stale when the Libya situation is just being reported? Noah, AATalk 15:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The storm has almost completely dissapated by now, damage has been done. I still think it would be okay to post, but if we were to we better do it soon, PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support Significant devastation, especially in Derna, and the latest reports say up to 2,000 people are believed to have died. Johndavies837 (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support. Unprecedented disaster. Storm just made landfall in Libya, so it is not stale. More than 2,000 people feared dead in Derna alone. Deadliest Medicane ever recorded. The floods in Greece and Istanbul alone are noteworthy. Here are some images from Libya; we should try to find some free ones. 50.101.173.184 (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, however... is the Causalities section needed? It is presenting just a running total if deaths already described in the previous sections. I do see a benefit if a causality count by country table in the Aftermath section. --Masem (t) 17:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support, unfortunate major disaster that absolutely deserves a place in ITN. Chaotic Enby (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Sara Sharif murder case

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Sara Sharif murder case (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An international manhunt has been launched after 10-year-old Sarah Sharif was found dead at her home in Woking, Surrey, England. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, The Gurdian, Sky, Telegraph, The Sun, Daily Mail, Independent, The Times
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The case, despite the passage of a month, continues to be a significant event that has drawn international attention and had a profound impact on the community. The case remains unresolved and has consistently been in the headlines, capturing the attention of media outlets worldwide. Ainty Painty (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose article not in good enough shape and is an orphan. I also don't think this is of global, international significance. It just doesn't make the ITN threshold. Secretlondon (talk) 17:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) Germany wins the FIBA Basketball World Cup

Article: 2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup concludes with Germany defeating Serbia in the final. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera DW Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Article needs some work before it's ready. Article has one cn tag but is good to go otherwise. Scientia potentia est, MonarchOfTerror 09:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Category 5 hurricane/typhoon in each ocean basin in the same season for the first time in the satellite era

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: 2023 Atlantic hurricane season (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ For the first time in the satellite era, a category 5 hurricane has formed in each of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans in the same year. (Post)
News source(s): [7];[Weather of 2023 Washington Post: A first: Category 5 storms have formed in every ocean basin this year]
Credits:
 Tenebris 66.11.165.110 (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment For the first time since the satellite era, all three major ocean basins have produced an (equivalent to) category 5 hurricane / typhoon (some more than one). There have additionally been (equivalent to) category 5 hurricanes in the southern hemisphere: eg. Cyclone Freddy. In total, counting the southern hemisphere, there have been SIX (equivalent to) category 5 storms this year (two in Oceania, one in the Indian Ocean north of the equator, one each in the east and west Pacific, and now one in the Atlantic), but this is far less unusual in the Pacific and Indian oceans than in the Atlantic. What makes it newsworthy is that this has occurred simultaneously, for the first time in the satellite era, in all three oceans.

Although most hurricanes lose significant strength before landfall, Typhoon Mawar in the Pacific basin struck Guam as a category 4, and Cyclone Mocha struck Myanmar as a category 4. The final effects of Hurricane Lee, in the Atlantic, have yet to be determined. (Better satellite measurements, meteorological understanding, and disaster planning have thankfully led to much lower mortality than similarly-powered storms have caused in the past -- aka why WP ITN should not lean solely on death counts to analyse storms.) I used "hurricane" rather than "typhoon" in the blurb because English-speaking WP leans toward the Atlantic. As well, the Saffir-Simpson scale is linked to hurricanes, with typhoons using a different measure. However, we could easily use typhoon, cyclone, or hurricane/typhoon instead. It is also worth noting that each of these storms developed its strength explosively (great increase in strength over a single day or two), but mentioning that in the blurb would take away from the fact that they existed at all. I used the picture of Mawar since it had the greatest land impact, but we could also use a picture of Lee since it "makes" the story. - Tenebris 66.11.165.110 (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This is trivia and, while a striking sign of climate change, isn't a specific news event fitting in WP:ITN. Chaotic Enby (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Agree with The Kip that this could be a DYK candidate. estar8806 (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work The news link provided didn't work so I've added a link to the Washington Post. This indicates that this particular aspect is due to ocean warming such as El Niño and that's driving a lot of extreme weather. As 2023 seems to be setting weather records in various ways, we should perhaps have a more general topic such as Weather of 2023. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    During an Atlantic high-activity era, El Niño typically results in a near-normal season and La Niña produces an above-normal season. During an Atlantic low-activity era El Niño typically results in a below-normal season and La Niña results in a near-normal season. Too much wind shear and stuff. However this is the record sea temperature year, entering uncharted territory. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Weather records (and similar such records) are not really suitable for ITN. We've had record heat waves and temperatures throughout this summer, and there were suggested to post but that didn't happen, nor should this. --Masem (t) 21:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Seems a bit of a reach - especially as two of these were months ago, and Hurricane Lee (2023) doesn't look like it's going to make landfall as a hurricane anytime soon (though might hit northern New England, or parts of Canada as a smaller Hurricane). We've had extreme climate ITNs; and we might well again soon with hurricane season in the Atlantic peaking. Nfitz (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh. I love weather, and I love tropical cyclones in particular, but this is a classic case of trivia. Issues here include such facts as A. the basins considered, while the currently active ones, are arbitrarily chosen and not all of the global basins B. the fact that what defines a category 5 is arbitrary and C. these particukar cyclones weren't concurrently occurring. SO yeah, neat, but that's about all. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


RD: Rubén Darío Carolini

Article: Rubén Darío Carolini (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Diario Hoy
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Argentine paleontologist. Discovered the GiganotosaurusThriley (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coco Gauff and Novak Djokovic win U.S. Open

Proposed image
Articles: Coco Gauff (talk · history · tag) and Novak Djokovic (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ American Coco Gauff and Serbian Novak Djokovic win the women's singles and men's singles, respectively. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In tennis, the US Open concludes with Coco Gauff winning the women's singles and Novak Djokovic winning the men's singles (both winners pictured).
News source(s): [8], Deadline Hollywood
Credits:

One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 TJMSmith (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Premature per Masem. Recommend speedy close and repost when men’s final is over. The Kip 00:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mike Yarwood

Article: Mike Yarwood (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Needs a fair bit of work to get it up to scratch, but achievable. - SchroCat (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Mangosuthu Buthelezi

Article: Mangosuthu Buthelezi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Zulu Leader Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) 2023 Marrakesh-Safi earthquake

Article: 2023 Marrakesh-Safi earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A magnitude 6.8 earthquake strikes Morocco, killing at least 296 people. (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

 elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Death toll in the hundreds. Significant. Bremps... 03:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: 2023 Rugby World Cup

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2023 Rugby World Cup (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, BBC, Le Monde
Credits:
Article updated
 AideDésintéressée (talk) 09:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - We shall post the result my friend. Don't usually put up the opening of sports events. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You put up the opening of the Women's FIFA World Cup opening though...And it wasn't as hpyed as this Rugby World Cup Agirlwithabrain (talk) 10:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could get behind ongoing. If we did put up the opening of the Women's world cup then I would have disagreed with that. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We didn't, because we don't blurb sport tournament openings (except the Olympics and occasionally similar). Of course, as a fan of both, the women's football was also easily more hyped than this Rugby World Cup - anyone's view of "hype", though, doesn't affect the scale of an event and isn't a good blurb argument. Kingsif (talk) 15:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It is a mojor event in the Rugby domain. Agirlwithabrain (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those viewing figures should be taken with a pinch of salt. Global viewing figures for sports are very hard to ascertain, and their governing bodies have a vested interest in hyping them up to promote their product. The quoted figure of 857 million for Rugby Union (from the governing body) is absurd. The total combined populations of all of the countries where it's genuinely popular don't even amount to half that figure. Effy Midwinter (talk) 08:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, we already have several ongoing topics and I am perfectly fine with limiting the ongoing sports for the Olympics and the FIFA World Cup. No need to include more sports (basketball World Cup is taking place at the moment as well, for example). --Tone 11:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support These days Rugby (Union) is much more mainstream and played in a lot more countries nowadays than in the old elitist amateur days, with the world cup being the pinnacle of this sport Josey Wales Parley 11:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is becoming silly. We don't "ongoing" tournaments just because they happen to be taking place. The result of the RWC will be posted at the end as per usual and that's it. The only exceptions to this are the Olypmics and the football world cup, as the largest sporting showpieces on the planet. And those are strictly exceptions.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • We also did the 2019 Cricket World Cup, and I would expect to do the same this year. Admittedly, we're looking at a worldwide audience heading towards 3 billion with that one, not far off that of the Olympics. The cricket article also gets an insane amount of pageviews. Black Kite (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I am not sure about the article quality at this point. I know to expect a lot of tables for tracking this, but there seems to be a lack of prose and citations for what has happened. For example, the opening ceremony being only two sentences long seems lacking. --Masem (t) 12:34, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    And further, we only typically feature lengthy sporting events in ongoing if there is widespread international coverage of the event on a day to day basis. The World Cup and Olympics clearly meet this. I'm not so sure about rugby as a sport. Masem (t) 17:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Major world event with worldwide media attention, and it would be a good thing to have other sports than football featured on the front page. Chaotic Enby (talk) 13:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add that sports tournaments are probably the kind of stuff we should have more precise guidelines for, and, whichever way it goes, this would be a good occasion to work on setting a precedent and potentially even drafting a guideline. Chaotic Enby (talk) 13:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Looking at the top views, it seems to be tennis that's doing best currently. But there are a lot of different sports jostling for attention and so YMMV. As they are all routine sports, WP:NOTNEWS applies. And note that rugby is a form of football too. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Rugby is a form of football doesn't add anything, as it was obvious the comparison was with association football (soccer). The question is, what is a "routine sport", and what differentiates it from a sport deserving an article? Why should WP:ITN be centered around a specific sport, even though we tend to avoid biases like this in other domains (presenting news from all countries, from all topics, etc.) Chaotic Enby (talk) 21:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Andrew’s traditionally been opposed to any sports coverage on ITN, I’d disregard the “it’s routine” comment entirely. The Kip 01:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Page views comparison. The 2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup was suggested to be added to ongoing last month; it was rejected. Comparing the pageviews, basketball leads rugby although it has to be sent the basketball's world cup is nearing its conclusion, while rugby's just get started. Also, ITN doesn't base what is posted on page views but on the biases of people here, but I guess you guys should already know that ;) Howard the Duck (talk) 23:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You're right to notice that the rugby world cup just started, and that its pageviews are much more equivalent to the first days of the basketball world cup. I think we could see in the next few days how it develops, although rugby appears on a stronger rising trend? We'll see! Chaotic Enby (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    See the 2019 World Cup pageviews (FIFA-W vs cricket vs rugby vs basketball); all world cups except for basketball lasted for more than a month, while basketball's took just over 2 weeks. Another caveat is basketball's have a lot more teams that are not from English speaking nations, vs. rugby and cricket. The 2019 final had both Spanish-speaking countries, and the 2023 final is Germany vs. Serbia (almost USA vs Canada, but they'd settle for third). For the curious, here's the Spanish Wikipedia article views during 2019.
    Rugby World Cup (and Cricket World Cup) also have show some actual prose; interestingly, FIFA-W didn't have prose? I thought this was a requirement? Howard the Duck (talk) 01:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Slight update, rugby page views are increasing substantially as the tournament gets started, with only the top 5 days in the basketball article's history being above yesterday's rugby page views. Chaotic Enby (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose You really can't compare a rugby union tournament to the Olympics or World Cup in terms of importance. It will get posted once it's over, quality permitting. Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality; there is a fair amount of prose, but it's mostly unsourced. In terms of whether it warrants ongoing, I think rugby union has a better argument for that than other sports, but isn't in my top 6 off the top of my head, and I can imagine other users see it even lower, so it would probably warrant discussion. Kingsif (talk) 15:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ongoing it's the world championship of one of the most popular sports in the world, perhaps we should have a standard where any world championship of any sports event over a certain threshold of popularity gets ITNR automatically. Flyingfishee (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The Rugby World Cup is already ITNR. This isn't a discussion about ITNR, it's about adding the tournament to Ongoing, and then once it's finished presumably adding it again as a blurb. Which seems overkill to me. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I know there is no clear-cut criteria for what can be posted as ongoing as a sports item, but I feel like that honor should be reserved just for Olympics and association football World Cups, which we can definitively agree are the two biggest sporting events in the world. DarkSide830 (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Democratic backsliding in the United States

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Article: Democratic backsliding in the United States (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Thirteen presidential centers from Hoover to Obama warn of fragile state of American democracy (Post)
News source(s): AP; UPI; Washington Post
Credits:
 soibangla (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Monique Bégin

Article: Monique Bégin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/feminist-pioneer-monique-b%C3%A9gin-dies-at-87-1.6962053
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former federal minister, one of the first three women from Quebec to be elected to the Canadian Parliament. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Adi Winarso

Article: Adi Winarso (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://radartegal.disway.id/read/665739/breaking-news-mantan-walikota-tegal-adi-winarso-meninggal-dunia
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Mayor of Tegal, 1999-2009. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 22:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Richard Hu

Article: Richard Hu (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.theedgesingapore.com/news/singapore/former-finance-minister-richard-hu-dies-96
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Singaporean Minister for Finance, 1985 - 2001. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 18:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Needs attention) RD: Lisa Lyon

Article: Lisa Lyon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.tmz.com/2023/09/08/bodybuilding-star-lisa-lyon-dead-dies/
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Pioneering American female bodybuilder. 65.94.213.53 (talk) 18:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: G. Marimuthu

Article: G. Marimuthu (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Popular actor. Known for his antagonist role in Ethirneechal (TV series) Abishe (talk) 18:58, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Shoukat Ali Laleka

Article: Shoukat Ali Laleka (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): GNN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Ainty Painty (talk) 12:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Tunku Ampuan Najihah

Article: Tunku Ampuan Najihah (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BERNAMA
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Consort to former Yang Dipertuan Agong (head of state) of Malaysia Peoya (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not enough prose wise about life, excluding long templates, awards and images. Also, more citations are needed. Bremps... 03:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: John Cairney

Article: John Cairney (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Scottish actor. Filmography needs additional sourcing. — Knightoftheswords 01:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Needs attention) RD: Edward Hide

Article: Edward Hide (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): TBN
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British Jockey. — Knightoftheswords 01:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Charles Gayle

Article: Charles Gayle (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Avant Music news
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American free jazz musician. Needs more sourcing. — Knightoftheswords 01:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: María Jiménez

Article: María Jiménez (singer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): LPLM
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Spanish singer. Needs expansion. — Knightoftheswords 01:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Woefully under-referenced and not accessible to someone unfamiliar with the subject. Yes, she was a singer, but what were her commercial and critical benchmarks? I see nothing about chart positions or awards, and if this page had been written today, I'd understand a reviewer in Australia or India or the UK tagging it for notability. The page talks about "relaunching" a career (when?) but never mentions it fading away in the first place. I've removed unsourced personal information, a category on ethnicity that had no backing to it and a filmography which I blanked per WP:BURDEN due to a troublesome name in there. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Not main-page quality. (The film Unknown Temptation refers to appears to exist, but wasn't linked or referenced.) Moscow Mule (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Enver Mamedov

Article: Enver Mamedov (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RBC Group (in Russian)
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Soviet diplomat. Should be ready to go. — Knightoftheswords 00:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Edgar Moron

Article: Edgar Moron (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): KStA
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German Politician. Needs an additional source. — Knightoftheswords 00:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Peter C. Newman

Article: Peter C. Newman (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Fox News, Maclean's, CBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Austrian-Canadian author and Journalist. Some citations are needed in the bio and bibliography section. — Knightoftheswords 00:45, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: