Wikipedia:XfD today
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
|
|
| Articles |
| Templates and modules |
| Files |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Speedy deletion candidates
[edit]Articles
[edit] |
- A request for adminship is open for discussion.
- Should a blackout be organized in protest of the Wikimedia Foundation's actions?
- Open letter regarding the Wikimedia Foundation's potential disclosure of editors' personal information.
- Should all administrators seeking resysop have made an administrative act within the previous five years?
- Extended-confirmed pending changes and preemptive protection in contentious topics
- Are portals encyclopedic, and are they appropriate redirect targets?
- Should recall petitions be limited to signatures only?
- Should the length of recall petitions be shortened?
- Omspace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG - The9Man Talk 18:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Spaceflight, and Gujarat. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 19:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)- Keep. May you explicate why you believe that this article fails WP:ORG? In the article alone I see three sources (1,2,4) that I believe to satisfy significance, reliability, and secondary.Arguably, the sources are quite recent, but I believe that aged sources are only the requirement for events (WP:EVENT). Pygos (talk) 04:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- The first link is a blog article, the second is an interview that isn’t about the company, and the 4th is also not a reliable news source - it's a blog masquerading as a news website. None of these sources come close to fulfilling the requirements of WP:ORG. - The9Man Talk 11:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- @The9Man The fourth source is not a blog. It's news website for TV9 Telugu, a mainstream TV network in India. It's absolutely a legitimate news source made by professional journalists.4meter4 (talk) 02:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- The first link is a blog article, the second is an interview that isn’t about the company, and the 4th is also not a reliable news source - it's a blog masquerading as a news website. None of these sources come close to fulfilling the requirements of WP:ORG. - The9Man Talk 11:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. May you explicate why you believe that this article fails WP:ORG? In the article alone I see three sources (1,2,4) that I believe to satisfy significance, reliability, and secondary.Arguably, the sources are quite recent, but I believe that aged sources are only the requirement for events (WP:EVENT). Pygos (talk) 04:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete. There are a couple of solid sources, but overall there isn't enough here to pass WP:ORGCRIT. It's a young company. Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON.4meter4 (talk) 02:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I do not see a pass of WP:ORGCRIT, not from here, not from a cursory search. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- East Glebe & Potomac station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page devoted to a bus stop with no detectable notability or reliable secondary source coverage. Propose that articles be deleted in favor of a consolidated route map on the Metroway page. Each bus stop does not warrant its own page, though, especially considering most of them are simply a small standard bus shelter or sidewalk sign.
I am also nominating the following articles on non-notable bus stops on the same bus line under the same nomination:
- East Glebe station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Reed station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- South Glebe station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 33rd & Crystal station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 27th & Crystal station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 23rd & Crystal station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 18th & Crystal station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 23rd & Clark station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 26th & Clark station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Swann station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Custis station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Potomac station (Metroway) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Fayette station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
nf utvol (talk) 01:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transport and Virginia. Kpgjhpjm 02:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Mehrdad Mehryar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability. he never played for the national team. looks like he played for some European clubs but they are not top clubs, mostly in lower divisions. if you google his name you rarely can find anything. Sports2021 (talk) 00:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Iran. Sports2021 (talk) 00:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC.4meter4 (talk) 00:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't find anything supporting notability through WP:SPORTSBASIC. nf utvol (talk) 02:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Bill Wylie-Kellermann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. Fails WP:NAUTHOR. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Christianity, and United States of America. UtherSRG (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep His books have been reviewed in major publications. He is also well known as an activist. See coverage in this article in the Guardian: No water for poor people: the nine Americans who risked jail to seek justice Thriley (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. In addition to the sources in the article, here are a couple book reviews from SAGE: [1] and [2]. Best.4meter4 (talk)
Files
[edit]Categories
[edit]NEW NOMINATIONS
[edit]Category:Decorating
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Contains only one article; possible duplicate of Category:Decorative arts QuantumFoam66 (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Romani people in art
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: It only has just one article, it might be merged into some other category but I can't think of anything right now. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 01:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Category:Plantations in the Danish West Indies
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: WP:CATNAME
- This is just a truth in advertising nomination since all 43 articles in this category are specifically sugar planations. The Danish version of the Triangular trade focused on this single crop. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Talk:Lost (2004 TV series)/Archive 1
[edit]- Talk:Lost (2004 TV series)/Archive 1 → Talk:Lost (2004 TV series)/Archive 1 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- All redirects at Special:PrefixIndex/Talk:Lost_(2004_TV_series)
Several redirects were created when I tried to move Lost (2004 TV series) to Lost (TV series) after closing an RM discussion, but did not notice that the talk page was move protected, causing me to attempt a manual round robin and probably botching something in the process. I am hoping this, along with all the redirects listed at Special:PrefixIndex/Talk:Lost_(2004_TV_series) can be deleted, as opposed to filling somebody's noticeboard with several dozen CSDs.
If they're kept for some reason, I will go about retargeting them, but from the look of it none of them are actually linked to outside of the other redirects. They should either qualify for WP:G6 or one of the redirect criteria. ASUKITE 01:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks like there are incoming links to some. Get them straightened out and I don't see why this can't then be speedied. (Or wait a day and a bot should clean up the 2xredirs...) - UtherSRG (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)