WIKIDELETION

TODAY

15:56, Thursday, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Page out of date? PurgeIt!™

About this page[edit]

This page gives live feeds for today's new AfD, TfD, FfD, CfD, and WP:CP nominations. (For technical and/or other reasons, feeds for speedy deletion, MfD and PROD are unavailable.)

Some sections contain redlinks and/or are empty; this means there have been no new nominations yet today.

See also: Wikideletion Yesterday

Articles for deletion[edit]

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 19	June 21 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Jennifer Uchendu[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The individual in question appears to be a non-notable researcher and climate activist. There is no significant coverage of their work in reliable third-party sources. The existing references consist mainly of personal profiles or brief mentions. GSS ^💬 15:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Nigeria. GSS ^💬 15:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Giant Squid (company)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP - mainly sourced to trivial announcements that don't count towards the notability of corporations. After a BEFORE, I am still not seeing the notability here, with the most major article about Matt Nava specifically rather than the company itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Neeraj Kundan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL where the article itself claims the subject person as a politician. WP:GNG can't surpass WP:NPOLL criteria. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

J.J. College of Arts and Science[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written promotionally Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

2027 Kentucky gubernatorial election[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Future event, more than three years away. The only reference is a speculative article with some rule-based candidate elimination and guesswork about who might run. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball -- this can be recreated when more concrete information is available. Mikeblas (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Future of the United States Navy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Literally just an out of date list of ships being built. The comparable articles for other navies are rich with prose. At best should be merged without redirect. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 15:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Giant Sparrow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NCORP with insufficient significant coverage. Ian Dallas, the studio's creative director, may be notable per WP:NARTIST and various sources covering him, but the studio itself doesn't seem to be, and the page was made by an account that made barely any other edits. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Sibpur Hindu Girls High School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Asia, and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Jagadbandhu Institution[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:GNG. Relies on WP:PRIMARY. Sources are passing mention only. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Ivy Road[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP; the sources are largely about Wanderstop rather than giving significant coverage to the studio. Could be redirected or merged to said game as an alternative to deleting. Either way, I suggest SALTing/protecting the page to prevent recreation, as it has been deleted once already for similar reasons. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Theta Delta Kappa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not shown, even after research. Naraht (talk) 14:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. Naraht (talk) 14:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Chiel Meijering[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero sources and nothing in a Before. Maybe notable for 117 bassoon concertos though. (Was BLPPRODed but removed because there were apparently sources though actually there was nothing but the composer's own sites and those not used as sources.) — Iadmc ♫^talk 14:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Music. — Iadmc ♫^talk 14:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Evil-Lyn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 14:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, and Comics and animation. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 14:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Santragachi Kedarnath Institution (Girls)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL as well as WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

List of Chicago Bears all-time record versus NFL[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a sports database. This level of detail runs afoul of WP:NOTSTATS, while also not meeting basic notability standards for lists. A higher level summary (i.e. the first table under All-Time Series) may be appropriate for merging, maybe into List of Chicago Bears team records, but this does not justify a standalone list. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete as a highly trivial list and per WP:NOTSTATS. Frank Anchor 14:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP: N. I can't find any secondary coverage about the subject. HyperAccelerated (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Ricco Diack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Coverage is limited to routine game coverage, team-affiliated sources, and sports databases; there are no examples of independent WP:SIGCOV of this individual player. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Crien Bolhuis-Schilstra[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find evidence of notability, the only indepth source is this, published by Scouting.nl, i.e. the organisation she worked for (not an independent source). The other sources are primary sources or passing mentions. Fram (talk) 08:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge into section of Vereeniging Nederlandsch Indische Padvinders, removing biographical info, keeping the scouting CV, POW information. The content is notable, even if the author is not notable enough. -Bogger (talk) 10:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, History, Military, Scouting, Indonesia, and Netherlands. Fram (talk) 08:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep There are sufficient details here to merit keeping the article. --evrik ^(talk) 13:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

That's not a policy based reason to keep or delete articles. Which sources are independent and indepth? Fram (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep: Well referenced figure, historically notable. –DMartin 02:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep: Subject is notable and reliably sourced. WC gudang inspirasi (^{Read! Talk!}) 14:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep: My vote is obviously to keep it; I wrote the article as I deemed it historically significant and notable. Cflam01 (talk) 14:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

It would be nice if anyone would actually address the nomination, and indicate which sources are (as required) independent of the subject and giving indepth coverage. The only indepth coverage I see is from a Dutch scouting site, so not independent (an organisation writing about aspects of its own history). Fram (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete as a clear WP:GNG failure. Without any sources that support notability, it is unclear if and how much content should be moved to Vereeniging Nederlandsch Indische Padvinders (correctly identified as a potential target by Bogger). So a BIG NO to merge. Redirect isn't right either, as Bolhuis-Schilstra was not organically included in the body of the target (only as possible other reading). Hence this should default to delete. Thanks to Fram for nominating. By no means the first time we see excessive Dutch scouting biographies. gidonb (talk) 19:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

BTW, this article is the best I could find, and isn't good enough: „Mijn leven in Indië", door een oudleerlinge van de Koloniale school.. "Haagsche courant". 's-Gravenhage, 11-03-1937. Geraadpleegd op Delpher op 16-06-2024, https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=MMKB04:000149139:mpeg21:p018 gidonb (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete: the keep !votes above are extremely weak and should obviously be dismissed by the closer, while a quick look at the "well referenced" article shows a distinct lack of WP:SIGCOV at all. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As per AirshipJungleman29's comments directly above.
Axad12 (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete. Searched Google books and found nothing. Sources presented in the article doesn't pass WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Fairoz Khan[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wonder how it passes WP:NPOL to exist here and that a WP:AUTOBIO by user @Fairoz22khan. If this to be here then why we are declining Draft:Varun Choudhary. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and India. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:NPOL. The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. There is no in-depth significant achievement notable. RangersRus (talk) 13:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: President of the student's union or a youth congress are not notable political positions. Being accused of sexual crimes doesn't add to notability. I don't see the notability for this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Birel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article only references corporate sources. It does mention a book, but unless this book can be sourced - which it so far has not been. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP for these reasons. Checking the Italian and Swedish versions for sources proved unfruitful, and with the book being prohibitively expensive to fix the reference (which is incorrect on publishing date) it is very difficult to see this being notable. JM 12624 13:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. JM 12624 13:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Anastasia Servan-Schreiber[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject started her PhD last year, so it's likely too soon for a pass of our notability guideline for academics and I don't see any other indicators of notability. – Joe (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Estonia, and France. – Joe (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Opay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. While on first glance there is significant coverage, all of it is press release, churnalism, routine announcements, or otherwise sources that fails WP:ORGCRIT. Even Forbes was generated by the company itself and the rest look like a well-run press campaign. Absent in-depth independent coverage, I do not see how this meets notability guidelines. CNMall41 (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Egypt, Nigeria, and Pakistan. CNMall41 (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment first of all, if you were a member of the Wiki project Nigeria. You will know that Opay is a notable bank. Talking about the sources, Opay is not a company that goes to the news to create well run press campaign. The news generates content base on the company notability as a global bank. To all the WP you cited, they all said a company is presumed to be notable which they gave their reasons and I don’t see how does the company fails to meet them. The article subject even also, passed WP:GNG.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 17:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC).

Thanks, Gabriel601. Unfortunately, notability is not based on knowledge of WikiProject Nigeria, nor is it based on it being a global bank. NCORP (And GNG) require significant coverage in reliable sources, independent of the subject. Are you able to point out the references that meet WP:ORGCRIT? I will take another look and if they meet the criteria withdraw the nomination. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I know too well notability is not based on WikiProject Nigeria, nor it being a global bank. But I am still surprise about what you are saying about it not being significant in a reliable source, independent of the subject. I have to start reading Wikipedia:Trivial mentions to understand what is significant coverage and reading WP:IIS to understand what is independent and I don't see how Opay fails to meet them. CBN stops Opay, Palmpay, others from onboarding new customers Is this not an independent source ? Because it's not talking about Opay directly but a Central bank stoping them. And when talk about significant coverage in reliable sources they are many out there on Google. It's a bank, so I don't think we should be expecting more than anything else than the government interaction. There is no difference between Opay, Kuda Bank and Moniepoint Inc. that was nominated for an AFD but was keep. Gabriel (talk to me ) 20:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I will look at this again but beware of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Understood. Gabriel (talk to me ) 14:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

~~Delete~~: So while reviewing AFCs, I encountered this draft and wanted to decline it. However, due to the Opay's operations in Nigeria and Egypt (in addition to Pakistan), I refrained from making a definitive judgment, as I was uncertain about the extent of coverage in sources from these 02 countries. But as far as Pakistani sources are concerned, the organization does not meet WP:NORG as I could not find sig/in-depth coverage in Pakistani RS. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Where does wikipedia state that if you can't find RS in Pakistani an article should be deleted? I have never even been to Pakistan so I didn't focus to write anything much about it. And from what I have seen so far I don't think the popularity it has gained in Nigeria, Pakistani nor Egypt are far better than it, so I didn't focus to get RS from those country.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 19:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Gabriel601, My assessment was based on the Pakistani sources cited in the article. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Because your assessment was based on the Pakistani sources made you voted delete. That sounds so funny, meanwhile, the sources from even the Pakistani section are not just mere blogs but newspapers which are qualified to verify if a statement is right according to WP:NEWSORG and WP:REPUTABLE. Gabriel (talk to me ) 19:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Gabriel601, Instead of spending your time mocking me, why not suggest some strong coverage that you believe can help establish WP:GNG? Simple! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I am not mocking you. I am just trying to understand your point which doesn't seem to be clear by Wikipedia. Because wikipedia is not just base on only Pakistani RS if that has been a reason you have been declining other editors article. Just like you said you would have declined Opay base on the Pakistani RS. Gabriel (talk to me ) 19:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Gabriel601, That's not quite what I meant but I don't think I need to explain further. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Saida, Gabriel601 seems to be a bit correct. We can't use a part to justify a whole or for example, John Doe is bad and for that, his family member are all bad. No! If you checked the Pakistani sources and since you may be familiar with them just help the article and remove it. As far as I can suggest it think, there were only two or three sources from Pakistan which I had removed not because they doesn't meet WP:SIRS but because they are mostly WP:INTERVIEWS. I hope this addresses a bit good matter, and thanks for analysing the Pakistan source. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

SafariScribe, I voted to delete in this AfD because the article mentioned the company operated in Pakistan. Now that the article no longer mentions Pakistan, it's not relevant to me anymore, and I don't have time to analyze Nigerian sources. So, I'm going to remove my vote and stay neutral. — Saqib (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

~~::@Saqib, I think you should probably stop trying to delete Pakistani stubs and stuff like that. See it all the time, you declining and prodding.~~ 48JCL TALK 02:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I am the one who recommended this for deletion actually. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

48JCL, What made you say this? — Saqib (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

@ 48JCL TALK 22:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

oops ignore that that was an accident 48JCL TALK 22:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep: Clean is not deletion. I won't call this WP:HEY because it is good before I made few changes. The sources though may be populated by a little unreliable/routine sources doesn't mean others should be same. Herein, if a source isn't good for an article, it can be removed, and not alter a whole deletion discussion . I have presented that all the sources in the article makes it meet WP:ORGCRIT. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy ping to @CNMall41, @Saqib, @Gabriel601, to reconsider the current state. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping. I see you approved this through AfC so you likely spent quite a bit going through the sources, but I feel that WP:SIRS may not have been applied correctly. Even the references since the nomination do not see to meet WP:ORGCRIT. Routine sourcing is fine to verify content, but not for notability. Can you point out the specific references that you feel meet ORGCRIT as the ones I see are still run of the mill?--CNMall41 (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

@CNMall41, you do be the one to do a source assessment. As much as I can see, all the sources or at least WP:THREE are all good to go. I am sorry to say you do have to see WP:SIRS again, maybe you are forgetting something. Since Organisation's are presumed notable, the sourcing maintains WP:SIGCOV, the sources are reliable per WP:NGRS, the sources are also secondary and independent of the subject. I don't even see any WP:ROUTINE because I have addressed that issue when I saw flaw of Pakistan, Egypt related matter. I address again, all the sources are all reliable and meets WP:ORGCRITE. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

I did assess the sources and did a WP:BEFORE yet you say there are sources that meet WP:ORGCRIT. Yet, you have not pointed them out so unsure where to go from here. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep Maybe it has some minor issues, but deleting it is not suggestedParwiz ahmadi (talk) 16:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Is there a policy-based reason for the vote? I am willing to look at references that meet ORGCRIT and withdraw the nomination if anyone can point them out. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Created with templates {{ORGCRIT assess table}} and {{ORGCRIT assess}}
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor.
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Secondary?	Overall value toward ORGCRIT
https://www.cbn.gov.ng/supervision/fi.asp?name=OPAY%20DIGITAL%20SERVICES%20LIMITED%20(FORMERLY%20PAYCOM%20NIGERIA%20LIMITED)&institutetype=Mobile%20Money%20Operator	Talks about Opay and it's former name	Official publication of the Central Bank of Nigeria.	It values the companies existence in Nigeria.	Because it isn't from the company, it is therefore a secondary source.
https://www.theafricareport.com/346765/nigeria-opay-palmpay-face-scrutiny-amid-rising-appeal/	Listing Opay among other fintech in Nigeria and a problem	Per RS.	Fintechs in Nigeria received a significant report based on the scrutiny.	Wasn't biased from a routine view. A news report.https://punchng.com/opay-highlights-achievements-plans-improved-security/
https://punchng.com/opay-highlights-achievements-plans-improved-security/	Reporting a press conference of Opay	Punch news is reliable per WP:NGRS.	A press reportage.	– Much more of a primary coverage since it was a press conference or thereso.	—
https://businessday.ng/technology/article/olu-akanmu-steps-down-as-president-of-opay/	Only about Opay and the CEO's withdrawal	Per WP:NGRS	Received massive reportage of a stepping CEO means the company is notable.	A secondary news report
https://thenationonlineng.net/fact-check-video-of-opay-agents-protest-in-ikeja-falsely-shared-as-recent/	A problem with the company's service	The Nation is reliable	Such rallies dress the media attention.	A secondary report. Why will a company drags it's name down.
https://dailypost.ng/2023/04/08/kano-court-sentences-opay-agent-to-nine-months-in-jail-for-stealing/	Problem again.	Per WP:NGRS.	Man's court case over Opay	A court case and arrest of an Opay agent is a secondary report
https://www.thecable.ng/opay-partners-verve-to-roll-out-opay-instant-debit-card-get-yours-anytime-anywhere-instantly/	Only about the subject	Ditto	Partnership to such a firm is usually taken to the media in Nigeria as it benefits the mass.	A secondary report thigh we can't tell if the report was called. I wonder term this primary because it came from a secondary source.
https://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2022/04/14/opay-obtains-approval-of-cbe-to-issue-prepaid-cards/	Ditto	Daily News Egypt is a newspaper with editorial policy.	Approval by the nations bank is a significant coverage	From a secondary source.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/africa-focused-payment-firm-opay-040352184.html	Ditto	– I don't know about Yahoo finance but it's mostly reliable	–	–	—
https://leadership.ng/opay-wins-in-fintech-category-at-nitdas-digital-nigeria-2023-awards/	An award ceremony	Per NGRS	Award ceremony are often significant especially when it's from NITDA	From a non primary coverage
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/12/opay-wins-advan-consumer-choice-award-for-best-fintech-2023/	Ditto	Ditto	– An ward ceremony that covers only one company is likely questionable.	From a secondary source.	—
https://punchng.com/opay-gets-wef-recognition-on-financial-inclusion/		Per NGRS	Received SIGCOV from an international organisation.	From a secondary source.
https://leadership.ng/opay-earns-cnbc-and-statista-global-ranking-in-digital-payment-category/	About a championship award won by Opay	Ditto	Why not	Non primary coverage.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for this. It does show that you are applying WP:SIRS incorrectly just be looking at the first four you listed. The first reference is a business directory listing. Never at any time have I ever seen it acceptable to use something like this towards notability. It would be the same as using a Bloomberg profile (see the section here on Bloomberg profiles). The second is paywalled and I do not have access but looks like it is one of four companies listed as being told to stop accepting some form of payments. This is NOT in-depth about the company as it likely doesn't describe the background of the company in-depth (just routine coverage although again, I do not have full access - I have seen these countless of times however). I am not sure about the third you listed by Punch, but would need clarification on what you mean by "primary coverage." The fourth also does not show WP:CORPDEPTH. It is routine coverage of the CEO stepping down. There is no depth to it about the company and you can see it is routine by the way it is covered in at least four other publications. It would fall under WP:CHURNALISM as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Really? Because this greatly fall under Nigeria, I do know how I analyse sources and know when other "copy cat" websites copy. ~~The fact is that other website you cited are blogs.~~ Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

The sources I cited above are the ones you stated meet WP:ORGCRIT. If they are blogs as you say, that is even more of a concern they don't meet the criteria. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

That was an error. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I never intended this would be a long argument since I thought you did a BEFORE before nominating or because of the Egypt-Pakistani error had earlier. Now, bypassing BEFORE do affect AFDs. Per GNG, an article that has shown relevant significant coverage is presumed to have a stand alone article/list,and here lies news publications, Google scholar lists, appearances on CSE, and this article [Eguegu, Ovigwe. “The Digital Silk Road: Connecting Africa with New Norms of Digital Development.” Asia Policy 17, no. 3 (2022): 30–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27227215.] quoting "...The Chinese fintech company OPay serves millions of Nigerian users and is valued at over $2 billion.14 Chinese firm Transsion Holdings dominates the African smartphone market with a 48.2% share, ahead of Samsung at 16%.15 Market-leading apps and services such as music streaming service BoomPlay, mobile payment...". Am I still having any other problem? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I never intend to be an argument but I am discussing points being made. I would also appreciate that everyone stops mentioning countries and culture as if this is a bias issue. Not all Wikipedia languages have the same guidelines and maybe the sources are good enough for other Wikipedia. However, for English Wikipedia, company guidelines are strict on sourcing. These simply do not meet it. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep: Amongst other sources found by SafariScribe, these source by Samson Akintaro of Nairametrics is a field work that reviewed the company. I understand that CNMall41 may have a feeling that the sources are probably biased or promotional but what reads as "normal" tone for a news article depends on your culture, and we don't want to be tone policing the sources. Best, Reading Beans 18:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Not a culturual thing. The applicable guideline is WP:ORGCRIT and when applying WP:SIRS there is nothing here that meets it. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. In plain English, this means that references cannot rely *only* on information provided by the company - such as articles that rely entirely on quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews, website information, etc - even when slightly modified. If it isn't *clearly* showing independent content then it fails ORGIND.

I'll also add that ORGCRIT is not the full picture when analysing sources and the analysis performed above is incomplete. Here is an analysis of those same sources performed against NCORP criteria:

This Listing on Central Bank website is just that, a listing. It does little more than verify the existence of a company at that point in time. What it doesn't do, is provide in-depth "Independent Content" about the company, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND.
This report from Africa Report is based on a directive from the CBN to halt on-boarding of new companies and is little more than a mention-in-passing, no in-depth "Independent Content" about the company, fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH.
This from Punch is based entirely on information provided by the company, fails ORGIND.
This in Business Day is also based entirely on an announcement by one of the company's execs with no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND.
This is a "story" about a tweet, it has no in-depth "Independent Content" that is from a RS, fails RS, ORGIND, and CORPDEPTH.
This from Daily Post is an article about a company exec convicted for stealing. It has no in-depth info about the company, fails CORPDEPTH.
This Daily News article is entirely based (and is) a PR announcement, fails ORGIND.
This published on Yahoo is also a company PR announcement, also fails ORGIND.
This in Leadership concerns the company winning an award but contains zero in-depth "Independent Content" about the company, fails CORPDEPTH/ORGIND.
This from Vanguard fails for the exact same reasons.
This article in Punch acknowledges that the topic company is mentioned in a report. That's it, just a mention. Fails CORPDEPTH.
This final one from Leadership is regurgitated PR and also contains no in-depth "Independent Content" on the company, fails CORPDEPTH and ORGIND.

In summary, not one single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability and the ones listed above are simply regurgitating company announcements and have no in-depth "Independent Content" in the form of independent analysis/fact checking/opinion/etc. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Analysing sources especially on companies are usually seen from the way a certain readability is mean. For example, it is mostly a liar to.say that companies doesn't have PR but at some point, one of the major ways of seeing the notability is per WP:SIGCOV. This has been talked about for years. I want you to address this source, and significant ways that shows SIGCOV like this JSTOR article, CSE, listing on Google Scholar, and this news sources. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

You can't spin PR or company-generated information into notability - that's a pretty basic foundation of our guidelines. Nor can you t rely on an article that discusses the app to establish the notability of the company - another fairly basic part of our guidelines - see WP:INHERITORG and WP:NOTINHERITED. You've also missed some pertinent points relating to the OUTCOME essay you linked to - first, its an essay and not one of our guidelines, second it speaks in generalities and not specifics. For specifics, you need to look at NCORP *guidelines* - the basis upon which notability is established - which I've linked to in the analysis of sources above.

You pointed to some other sources. In summary, none of those meet NCORP guidelines for establishing the notability of the company either. I encourage you to familiarise yourself with WP:GNG/WP:NCORP guidelines as you have repeated the same misunderstanding. For example, this article in Nairametrics] is written by a tech contributor about the app, not the company. The start of paragraph 3 contains one sentence about the company but has zero in-depth information about the company and a single sentence is not sufficient to meet CORPDEPTH criteria. The next reference entitled "The Digital Silk Road" is available through the WP library and is 10 pages. The topic company gets a single one-line mention on page 4. That is insufficient and this reference also fails CORPDEPTH. For your other two links, please see WP:GHITS but in summary, we require specific sources, the volume of "hits" is not one of the criteria. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Can you perhaps tell me why OPay is non-notable. Aside from the news sources that you have discredited for reasons best known to you, can you give me a rundown on the following sources?

Adinlewa, Toyin (2022). "Effectiveness of Opay ORide outdoor advertisements on market expansion in Akure metropolis". African Social Science and Humanities Journal. 3 (2). ISSN 2709-1317 – via AJOL.

Ogiriki, T.; Atagboro, E. (2022). "EMERGENCE OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY AND MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES IN NIGERIA". BW Academic Journal. 1 (1).

Nezhad, Mahshid Mehr; Hao, Feng (2021). OPay: an Orientation-based Contactless Payment Solution Against Passive Attacks. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC '21). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 375–384.

Omotayo, Funmilola O.; Tony-Olorondu, Josephine N. (31 August 2023). "Promoting Cashless Economy: The Use of Online Electricity Payment Channels in the Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria". Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective – via Sage Journals.

Southwood, Russell (2022). "Mobile money: From transferring cash by SMS to a digital payments ecosystem (2000–20)". Africa 2.0. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.

I can go on for some time but I want to sternly believe that you have understood the point I am trying to make. Best, Reading Beans 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 22:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Comment Actually haven’t had enough time to contribute but as per the one delete vote. I don’t think the user has made its research on google to find what he or she is actually looking for. Sometimes it happens like that to some editors. While the editors who voted keep has provided more reference beyond the reference on the article from google. I’m currently weak at the moment and look forward to others contributions.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 23:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reponse Thankfully, the AfD isn't decided by a count of !votes, but by the application of our guidelines. In this case, I've pointed out how each and every reference fails GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. The editors who !voted to Keep don't appear to grasp the fact that the guidelines for establishing notability of a company require in-depth "Independent Content" *about* the *company*. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep: For context's sake (the current version of this article is not clear about this), Telnet was a company that owned Paycom, Opera acquired Telnet's Paycom, picked the O from Opera and picked the Pay from Paycom to reflect a merge of these services, Opay. [source1] [source2] Opay has deep historical records and coverages of how it came about, from being Telnet's property (Paycom) to becoming Opera's property (Opay) all over the web, Business Day gives quite a handful of history here. There's a review of Opay's services right here on Nairametrics. With these, I am satisfied with WP:NORG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Can this also be added to the article about how OPay came about. For now I’m currently busy off Wikipedia and will be back soon. Thanks. Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces, no doubt the company exists but neither of those sources meets GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. The Nairametrics article discusses the app, not the company and fails CORPDEPTH (I discuss this above) and the Businessday article appears to rely entirely on an interview with Folorunsho Aliu, group managing director of Telnet, failing WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

All I see from your statement is a confusion. There is no point debating. If the app was discussed, theirs no need differentiating it from the company. It is part of the company. This is not like a father and son scenario. Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

I am not trying to save this article that was why I haven't involve myself lately even though I created it. But I look forward to valuable reasons. Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

No, that's wrong. If the app is notable, then we'd have an article about the app (also meeting GNG/NCORP guidelines). This article topic is the company. WP:NCORP applies to articles on companies, but you should be aware that those same guidelines apply also to articles on products. When you are reading the guidelines, you should be aware of this fact, otherwise you might incorrectly make assumptions about product notability and company notability. In a nutshell, notability of a company does not bestow notability to their products/services and vice versa. A review of a product does not assist in determining notability of a company. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
@HighKing, I disagree with this submission. NCORP and other guidelines are not above GNG; they are a branch of GNG if I’m not mistaken. I see a lot of misunderstanding here. If an entry meets GNG, I don’t think it would need to meet a different criteria for “product” or “company” to be considered notable. Best, Reading Beans 03:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

You seem to misunderstand WP:NCORP. Are those sources not part of being significantly covered or are you cleared on the deletion of this article? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

I don't think I misunderstand NCORP at all, I think you do. The app is not the topic of this article, therefore those sources cannot be used to establish the notability of the topic. In plain English, you cannot use product reviews to establish notability of the company and vice versa. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
@HighKing, are you suggesting the app is notable and the company is not? If so, it needs a rewrite. Best, Reading Beans 03:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Despite edit count, you are a relatively new user. I would recommend going through company deletion discussions and talk page discussions of NCORP before making such a suggestion. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As editors have given counterposed readings of the quality of the sources cited, additional editors' impressions of the assembled bibliography would be highly beneficial to determining consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Primorial sieve[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant WP:OR: the unique source is not published and consists of vague consideration on a supposed algorithm that is not even described. D.Lazard (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. D.Lazard (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete, per nomination. I did also look for this in a couple of textbooks on computational number theory and in the mentioned Scottish Book, and did not find it in either. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete - not remotely encyclopedic, woolly, rambling, uncited, and per the above actually unciteable, i.e. WP:OR. Delete as not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Center on Media and Child Health[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. All sources are research carried out , mostly by Michael Rich, but nothing independent discussing the center. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and United States of America. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, Soft Deletion is not an option
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge to Boston Children's Hospital as WP:ATD. The sourcing only supports "this is listed as an affiliation on research papers", which is insufficient for a stand-alone article. Walsh90210 (talk) 01:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge to Boston Children's Hospital#Research, where it will fit nicely. The sources do not establish notability as they just mention an affiliation of the researcher with the center. Malinaccier (talk) 13:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Shiv Prasad Kanaujia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On the face of it, this is a politician who should pass NPOL. But, I couldn't find any reliable source online that shows that he won the 2017 election in Uttar Pradesh. The results from the Election Commission of India show that a different person (Ashish Kumar Singh) won the Bilgram-Mallanwan Assembly constituency seat in 2017. My searches online didn't find any sources that would show that the subject passes GNG. A previous PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, India, and Uttar Pradesh. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:NPOL. The degree of significance of the subject and of role as politician is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. RangersRus (talk) 13:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
DELETE. Strange that it was created in 2018 with blunder. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Beachhead Solutions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. However, I found enough sources for PROD to perhaps not be warranted:

brief mention in WSJ

A short mention in a 2006 piece from The Mercury News: Beachhead Solutions in Santa Clara sells a $129-a-year service, Lost Data Destruction, which enables an administrator to send a command to destroy data on a laptop that has been stolen. If the thief tries to hook the laptop up to the Internet, it will send a message to the administrator and trigger the data destruction. – Teratix ₵ 12:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and California. – Teratix ₵ 12:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Shafkat Saeed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. 2 of the 3 sources are primary. And the third source is just routine coverage. LibStar (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, South Africa, Pakistan, Iran, Kuwait, Belgium, France, and Luxembourg. LibStar (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Yes fails GNG clearly. I did WP:BEFOER and only found some WP:ROTM coverage. Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

ఐ 20[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. 2 of the 3 sources appear to be copies of each other (I couldn't access the third), and no reliable sources were found online. Does not meet WP:NFILM. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Fashion in China.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should probably be deleted or even merged in some way to Chinese clothing, since only one person was involved and there's a lot of overlap with the existing page. Looking at the talk page I suspect it was a class project of some kind. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Comment: The creator, Bai0926, has userfied the article so it is no longer eligible for AfD. Part of the article was a blatant copyvio and a lot of it seems to be WP:CLOP. I've tagged the blatant parts for RD1. C F A 💬 14:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Gaurav Nanda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The sources available in the article only appear as simple mentions, which is not enough to demonstrate notability. And the history of contributions to the article assumes a WP:COI. Ciudatul (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. Ciudatul (talk) 11:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

LSU Department of Finance[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not seem that this department of the business school is notable by itself, all references are incidental do not shown notability. Relevant information can easily be covered by the business school that it belongs to the E. J. Ourso College of Business article. This article seems to almost be a sales prospective for the department and has no general value. We could merge this with the business school, but I see little worthwhile content for merging and so I believe the best option is to delete this article. Sargdub (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Education, and Louisiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete agree with nom that the article content is almost entirely WP:OR and WP:NOTBROCHURE. BrigadierG (talk) 12:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

People in the line of succession to the British throne[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Line of succession to the British throne was merged and redirected in 2015 as a result of Talk:Succession to the British throne/Archive 2. This page is reliant on a single source that does not in fact list people in line. It lists descendants of the Electress Sophia who would be in line if they renounced their own religion, became Anglicans and adopted British nationality. In reality, for anyone so far down the line to inherit the British throne, the world would have had to endure a catastrophic disaster of such monumental proportions that it is extremely unlikely that the monarchy would exist. This content is not suitable for an encyclopedia because it is one wikipedian's selection of whom they consider to be the notable descendants of Sophia that is not representative of a wide-base of scholarly sources. DrKay (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. DrKay (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete The article is nothing more than WP:OR. Keivan.f^Talk 12:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

The Rascals (producers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find substantial coverage of the duo or recognition of their work, so no apparent notability by our standards. This should probably be redirected to Leon Thomas III since his article mentions the group multiple times and includes all the same credits. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Sergey Skabelkin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person is not notable; sources are about companies or projects. Many facts are just there with completely zero sources 鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Cryptocurrency, Finance, Russia, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Oleksandr Komarov (businessman)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person is not notable; highly promo article; sources are about companies nor the person; 鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Terwin (corporation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Terwin corporation doesn't meet NCROP - no reliable independent of the subject sources; advertisement, Spam#Advertisements_masquerading_as_articles 鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrities who use their middle names as their first names (2nd nomination)

Celebrities who use their middle names as their first names[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the phenomenon of using the middle name as first name could have an article (and is already discussed at Middle name#Middle name as primary forename), a list of every single notable person doing this would likely be way too large, and I haven't seen them discussed as a group in reliable sources. For virtually any person on this list, them using their middle name instead of their first name is at best trivia, and not connected to their notability, making this ultimately non-encyclopedic. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Terézia Kulová[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This woman has appeared for her national team, but fails WP:GNG due to lack of in-depth coverage. My Google searches are limited to brief mentions on news websites as well as database. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 09:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 09:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 12:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism of Stonehenge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This event is fully covered in a short paragraph in the main Stonehenge article. The idea that something which happened yesterday and was cleaned up today with no lasting effects needs a whole article with the sweeping title 'Vandalism of Stonehenge' is unreasonable. Attempts to query the notability of this article, or to expand its scope to match the title, have been rebuffed by the creator, which rather smacks of WP:OWN. GenevieveDEon (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge with Just_Stop_Oil#2024: Per OP. Not independently notable when this is one among many Just Stop Oil protests. — Czello ^(music) 09:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge whatever is salvageable to Just Stop Oil per OP. WP:NEVENT is relevant. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge where appropriate and delete. Given the tabby choice of title I'm agnostic if we need even the redirect. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Environment, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge whatever is appropriate to Just Stop Oil. I was tempted to nominate it myself, but thought for some reason we should wait one week or so when coverage inevitably stops. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 10:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
With that said, I would be down to expand the scope to all acts of vandalism on Stonehenge. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 13:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment the title is simply "Vandalism of Stonehenge" so this article could be used to cover all vandalism attempts on the monument. Otherwise Merge as above— Iadmc ♫^talk 11:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete just another stunt from them. No damage - not interesting. Secretlondon (talk) 12:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment from creator — I absolutely did not say the scope couldn’t be expanded. In fact, my only comment regarding notability of the article was to note that LASTING could not be proven, and that a reassessment should occur in a week for notability. I am not going to !vote here, however, GenevieveDEon put words into my mouth in this WP:RAPID deletion attempt. I personally ignore the nomination reasoning by GenevieveDEon for that reason, however, all other comments (keep, merge, or delete) from other editors I will be looking at extensively and appreciate all the responses. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 12:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

On closer inspection, I see that the large additions that were removed were from IP users trying to make the page be about the nearby road tunnel. That's obviously not appropriate in any case. But it does highlight a deeper problem: the concept of 'vandalism' is not culturally or politically neutral, and deciding what should be included or excluded from such a general article would be very difficult. As it stands, this article is still undue emphasis on a very short-lived and likely insignificant event. I also note that User:WeatherWriter tagged me with the 'climate change is a contentious subject' talk page template. This isn't about climate change. I have no interest in the purported subject matter of the protest. My position would be the same whatever the purpose of the protest - a separate article is unnecessary. And calling this "the vandalism of Stonehenge" was, is, and remains ludicrous. We're not here to elevate utterly trivial news stories into separate encyclopedic topics. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge with Just Stop Oil#2024 as per above. For vandalism attempts other than the Just Stop Oil one, they would be more suitable for inclusion in the Stonehenge article. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 12:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Expand Scope or Merge — The scope of the article should be expanded to cover all acts of vandalism to Stonehenge throughout history. If that cannot be agreed apon, then I support a complete merge (the entire article content) into Just Stop Oil. I would also encourage other editors to consider the scope expansion. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 12:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep - and expand scope. There must have been similar incident etc in the past. Sourcs are good and notability fow now obvious.BabbaQ (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

I regard that as an unncessary content fork - there's not enough on this in the main Stonehenge article to warrant it. When there is, then such a fork would be worth considering. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge Incident appears to be a run of the mill publicity stunt with no long term significance specific to this event. Subject fails WP:LASTING, WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:SENSATIONAL and the WP:10YT. Arguably this is a good example of why we should not rush to create articles about recent events. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

I strongly agree. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Better to merge into Stonehenge surely? Rather than Just Stop Oil — Iadmc ♫^talk 15:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

I didn't originally propose a merge at all, because there's already a more-than-sufficient mention of it in the Stonehenge article itself. (See the discussion on the talk page there about whether that's warranted.) The Just Stop Oil article needs some work in any case because it's tending to WP:PROSELINE at the moment, but I don't feel qualified to say whether merging this page into it would help that issue. GenevieveDEon (talk) 15:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Peninsula Engineering Group, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating following PROD and refund request. Appears to fail WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Appears to mainly cite primary sources, with none sustaining a claim to notability. Various searches are struggling to turn up anything. Mdann52 (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

The company went through a few name changes: first to Peninsula Wireless Communications, and then to Repeater Technologies. The company was taken public and then went bankrupt under the name Repeater Technologies. Peninsula Engineering Solutions is a successor organization, which was acquired by Infinity Wireless. https://www.infinitiwireless.com/we-are-pleased-to-announce-the-merger-of-their-two-companies/

The company's patent on split band filtering was a foundational patent in on frequency repeaters for cellular mobile radio. It is cited by 36 other patents, see: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4783843A/en Rabcfi (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

TwoTiime[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No discography or chart activity, and no third-party independent coverage. Sources are all primary, consisting of promotional interviews, press releases, and subject's hometown publication (Ottawa Citizen). 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 04:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete - The Ottawa Citzen article was reliable, but there is no widespread coverage in reliable source about this person or their music. No charted songs or notable awards. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep: I created the article but I'll comment anyways. Meets WP:BASIC. There are at least two in-depth Complex articles ([1] [2]) - Complex is a recommended source at WP:A/S and is independent of the subject. There are many in-depth HipHopCanada articles ([3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]) which are independent of the subject. There are multiple in-depth HotNewHipHop sources ([10] [11] [12] [13] [14] ) - HotNewHipHop is also a recommended source per WP:A/S. This isn't including the many Ottawa Citizen articles which are all independent and reliable, or any of the interviews that add little additional commentary. Doesn't have to meet a SNG if it meets GNG/BASIC. I don't see how this is controversial. C F A 💬 21:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Another issue is that the article also reads like a promotional piece, with nothing therein showing why he’s actually notable. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 03:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
A non-neutral tone is not a reason for deletion, though. It can be fixed through editing. I think it’s pretty clear the subject meets GNG, regardless of any SNGs that might apply. C F A 💬 10:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

King Hiss[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorceress of Castle Grayskull[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Ram-Man[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is notable per BEFORE. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy and and Television. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 06:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

2024 Sydney Super Cup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article for an international event claimed to be held in six months' time, yet there's not a single mention of it online. The first event was a bit of a lawsuit-fest, and the best I could come up with in a WP:BEFORE search for a future event is this July 2023 article saying that the dispute was settled, with Rangers FC saying that they may participate in future TEG-sponsored events from 2024 to 2026. But the very specific claims here (Inter Miami, Malaysia U-23) look a lot like a hoax, or wishful thinking at best. Prod contested without comment (and other templates removed) by article creator. WP:TOOSOON at my most charitable. Wikishovel (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Australia. Wikishovel (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom; I searched and was unable to find any sources verifying this version of the event or any of the claims contained in the article; quite possibly a hoax. Left guide (talk) 07:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete – Per above. Svartner (talk) 12:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Heartland Museum of Military Vehicles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries, Military, Transportation, and Nebraska. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment if this does somehow survive deletion I am able to get some photos for the article. I haven't looked much into the Museum itself so I can't currently comment on it's notability. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 04:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep - This is not written like an advertisement, instead it needs improvement, not deletion. I'm appalled to see this nomiated for deletion. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Weak Keep, I've found some sourcing. Cleanup is possible, not a reason to delete. This is nowhere near TNT level. Star Mississippi 14:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep. This page need to be rewritten to not be like an advertisement, but there are some articles online about the museum that make it notable. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 17:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Apart from being written like an advertisement (WP:NORG), this entry fails WP:GNG. Its only sources are its own website. AstridMitch (talk) 03:58, 19 June 2024

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete: Could be notable, but sourcing is primary in the article. I can only find various travel blogs or listings for them [15], without much coverage at all. Oaktree b (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Racism in North America[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unnecessary conflagration of Racism in Canada, Racism in Mexico, and Racism in the United States. It should redirect to a list at Racism by country#North America. Walsh90210 (talk) 23:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada, Mexico, and United States of America. Walsh90210 (talk) 23:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep - I see what is trying to be accomplished, organizing a set of existing pieces on racism by country. I'm good with it. Carrite (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge then Redirect - I concur with the original requester. Any content that happens to be unique to this article (I couldn't find any in my review) should be moved to one of the country-specific articles. Then, it should be redirected to a list of the country-specific articles. Garsh (talk) 23:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's try relisting this one more time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete. There are many sources that discuss racism in Canada, racism in the USA, and racism in Mexico. I highly doubt there are many sources that discuss racism across the entire North American continent, especially as a distinct geographical entity from Latin America/South America. This article should not exist unless sources can be found that specifically discuss racism in North America as a whole. Astaire (talk) 06:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nom ꧁Zanahary꧂ 07:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep per the coverage in these sources. The current article is synthetically-constructed, but notability is based on article potential, not article condition. Pinging @Walsh90210, Garsh2, Astaire, and Zanahary: please re-consider. Left guide (talk) 07:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I am not convinced yet.
- The last three sources (Wong Hall, Wendt, Wilkinson) appear to be using "North America" as a shorthand for Canada and the US, with little or no discussion of Mexico. The first source (Smedley) is overwhelmingly about the US: it only uses the word "Canada" twice in the text, and Mexico is only mentioned glancingly in the context of colonial exploration. Sources that are actually about "racism in North America" should at a minimum discuss all three of the continent's largest countries.
- The third source (Danso) is printed by Nova Science Publishers, which was classified as a vanity press (i.e., no peer review).
- The second source (Russell) is the best, but it appears to be discussing the separate countries in isolation, rather than as a coherent "North American" unit. See e.g. "Chapter 4: Immigration", which has sections on "European Immigration in the United States", "Anglophones, Francophones, and Multiculturalism" (in Canada), and "A Dearth of Immigrants in Mexico". Or "Chapter 5: Race Mixture", which has sections on "México Mestizo", "The Canadian Métis", and "Racially Mixed and Socially Black in the United States". Or "Chapter 9: Racial Contours of North America", which has sections on "Legacies of Slavery, War, and Colonialism in the United States", "Mestizos, Indians, and Criollos in Mexico", and "Visible Minorities and First Peoples in Canada". So using this source would result in the same WP:SYNTH issues that the article currently suffers from.
Astaire (talk) 13:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Enhanced network selection[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Not clear what the topic really means outside of GSM, not clear that sources exist to show notability JMWt (talk) 09:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 09:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge/redirect to GSM I guess? Seems like an obscure and obsolete feature of old cellular phones used by one particular network during a transition period? I guess Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia and could cover a topic this obscure, if there were appropriate references, but there don't seem to be. I just see forum posts and patent applications (which are highly technical and don't explain the term, and are primary sources we wouldn't generally use anyway). --Here2rewrite (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete a generic term. The article is unsourced, and was presumably written based on a single-source: a description in a c.2005 manual about the GSM protocol. Walsh90210 (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Rossi Morreale[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and poorly sourced BLP. The present sources barely mention him or are gossip about his wedding. Ditto any search. Fails WP:GNG, WP:GOSSIP, and WP:V. — Iadmc ♫^talk 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Popular culture, and American football. — Iadmc ♫^talk 04:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete — this man played minor-league American football for a few years and appeared on a bunch of TV shows of very little interest. White 720 (talk) 04:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
@White 720 Interesting change of heart by the creator — Iadmc ♫^talk 04:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
It happens. But only rarely so maybe don't rub it in. I thank White 720 for not using this forum to waste anyone's time where most others would. It's a kind gesture. So thanks White 720. JFHJr (㊟) 04:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I created this article 17 years ago after being curious about the subject's then-current project. I don't have any real attachment to the article subject, and while I can't resist a chance to save an article with last-ditch citation adding (I've succeeded before) there's no point in preserving an article for a person whose entertainment career never really took off. White 720 (talk) 05:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. I didn't mean any malice — Iadmc ♫^talk 05:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Following this referral from WP:BLPN. This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The sole extrinsic claim to N is WP:NACTOR. However, (the paucity of) BLP-worthy reliable sources underlying the claims to NACTOR makes it hard to support any particular prose or derivative filmography section. If we remove what is unreffed or supported only by the subject or allmusic, there is no encyclopedic biography. JFHJr (㊟) 04:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arkansas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Found [[16]], but I was surprised of the lack of WP:SIGCOV considering this subject played at the highest level of college football. Let'srun (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Adam Kendrick[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this previously unreferenced article about an actor (also known as Adamo Palladino), and added two sources. One is a passing mention and the other is an interview with a family member in the local paper. I don't believe he meets WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, Television, United Kingdom, and England. Tacyarg (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Blue, White and Red Rally[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On fr wiki, it just a redirect, on pl wiki, an AfD is ongoing. BEFORE shows very little, as does the article itself. Seems that this organization was either short lived or did not achieve much outside generating a little media buzz when it was founded. I don't see what makes it meet WP:GNG - perhaps it should redirect Jean-Marie Le Pen, as is done on fr wiki? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and France. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

2014 Pathum Thani building collapse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a news story. All sources are news sources and it did not have any major societal ramifications to meet WP:NEVENT. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Thailand. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: per nom ꧁Zanahary꧂ 07:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Fails lasting impact. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

2021 Ravanusa explosion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a news story. All sources are news sources and it did not have any major societal ramifications to meet WP:NEVENT. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Italy. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Comment: There is further coverage on the Italian article, but if that's enough to pass NEVENT, I'm not sure. PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Singara Chennai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable reviews or other sources other than a single production source. A search in Sify ([17]), Chennai Online ([18]), and BizHat ([19]) proves futile. Please find the Kalki and Cine South reviews or redirect to Chennai as all online sources prove to be a description for the city. A WP:BEFORE found a fleeting mention here (சிங்கார சென்னை). DareshMohan (talk) 03:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Redirect to Chennai: Per nom. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect to Kalabhavan_Mani#Tamil_films. Poor sources with no significant coverage and reliable critic reviews. RangersRus (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Jesse Sylvia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Games, and United States of America. UtherSRG (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete I agree. Not really notable, even as a poker player, I would delete it. WhyIsThisSoHard575483838 (talk) 02:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Note Three new sources have been made inclusion before this went AfD but after it went up as a proposed deletion. I now sincerly reach out to editors like UtherSRG with a question of what's more to add. Everything is in there; primary sources, local sources, stats database sources, routine match coverage sources, indepth match coverage sources. And even if someone would remark on there being only two scores you should keep in mind that one score is for $5,000,000 - and is a second place in the main event (world championship) - and the other is a win in a WPT Main Event (the largest set of tournaments next to the World Series of Poker) - both these scores alone should merit inclusion. PsychoticIncall (talk) 13:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Please read WP:SIRS. If you feel that the sources pass SIRS, please provide WP:THREE for evaluation. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep It's a bit silly asking for sources for such obvious results (events) as a main event 2nd place and a world poker tour win when it's obvious these events have taken place (with the selective outcome). Like asking for more sources too validate Stanley Cup or Super Bowl. That said - the three sources needed for evaluation is right there (ref: 3;4;5;6). PsychoticIncall (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:SIRS, the references must each be independent, reliable, and provide significant coverage. None of them provide significant coverage. You have obviously failed to read and understand WP:SIRS. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Could you be a bit more specific? The sources are specialized, but they do seem to be reliable, independent, and provide non-trivial coverage of the topic. Hobit (talk) 22:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Significant coverage is the only one I say couldn't be debated; of the sources have looked at, they are all about Jesse Sylvia doing something, whether it be his performance at a competition or otherwise. ✶Qux yz ✶ 02:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep Pokernews is fine for new about Poker (unless it's on a list of non-RSes?). The local "boy does well" article is reliable, independent, and provides significant coverage. I think we're okay on meeting WP:N. Hobit (talk) 22:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep, While there are no big name sources like NYT or AP, I scanned over a few and they seem good enough. ✶Qux yz ✶ 02:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

2023 Women's Asian Hockey5s World Cup Qualifier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Sources do not provide independent WP:SIGCOV. Unable to locate sources. Bgv. (talk) 01:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, Asia, and Oman. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

LSU Department of Finance[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not seem that this department of the business school is notable by itself, all references are incidental do not shown notability. Relevant information can easily be covered by the business school that it belongs to the E. J. Ourso College of Business article. This article seems to almost be a sales prospective for the department and has no general value. We could merge this with the business school, but I see little worthwhile content for merging and so I believe the best option is to delete this article. Sargdub (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Education, and Louisiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete agree with nom that the article content is almost entirely WP:OR and WP:NOTBROCHURE. BrigadierG (talk) 12:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Arie Trouw[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Current sources are not independent (interview/written by subject) or are unrelated (focused on his daughter, not the subject). Other sources found online are largely passing mentions, with no coverage meeting WP:NBASIC. Previously soft deleted at AfD. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, South Africa, and United States of America. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Congraph and Bloxter come up as sources, so this is more crypto-spam. I don't see this individual being covered in any RS and this reads as a fluffy resume. Oaktree b (talk) 14:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

James Sunter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't see how this individual is notable enough for a page, both in the general sense and in the parameters for which clerics are notable. Much of the article is unreferenced, and some of the sources at the bottom are only brief mentions. One actually focuses on the son of the subject. Leonstojka (talk) 23:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity, England, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Christianity, England, and Australia. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 00:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep Canon Sunter was arguably the most important incumbent of St Paul's church (now repurposed), the third, and most central, Anglican church in Adelaide. His activities were regularly reported in Adelaide newspapers, rating over 1,000 mentions on Trove, and there may be more to find, as the illustration appears to be taken from an encyclopedia or church history. Doug butler (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep - With all due respect to the hard-workings of Wikipedians who insist on adherence to all the Wikipedia dictates ... there's more to it when it comes to spiritual leaders. I've done a great many Hawaii articles on spiritual leaders. The ones that impress me with their Christian walk in life, are not the ones who necessarily made the headlines when alive. It's people like Alice Kahokuoluna and Father Damien who put their own safety aside to care for the helpless leprosy patients. The ones who don't impress me are the spiritual leaders who make the news, and hobnob with legislative leaders. Not to knock Wikipedia guidelines, but people putting their own lives and welfare on the line to serve others, just doesn't seem to arise in Wikipedia guidelines. — Maile (talk) 02:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete: I tend to agree with the nomination. This is a rather well-sourced biography of a religious person, but I'm not sure what the notability is... He built a school, ministered to the faithful, other routine things. I suppose it would all get reported on at the time, but it's all strictly local news reporting on what the pastor was up to that week. Oaktree b (talk) 03:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes, a lot of Wikipedia is like that. That's what makes it useful. Doug butler (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
What's wrong with this source, which appears to be an extensive full-column long story on his life in a major newspaper? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Linked five times in the article. Doug butler (talk) 15:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Technical question: when the deletionists have whittled the English WP down to 1 million articles class C and above, or 2 million mid-importance or higher, how much storage space will be saved ? Doug butler (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This isn't a debate about inclusionists vs. deletionists but just whether or not the sources that can be located can establish notability. Let's focus on that here before closing this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Templates for discussion[edit]

June 20[edit]

Template:Gareth Asher and the Earthlings[edit]

Template:Gareth Asher and the Earthlings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Musical group navbox with no useful links to albums or singles in the body. The only blue link is to another associated act. DB1729^talk 11:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Owari clan genealogy Amenohoakari[edit]

Template:Owari clan genealogy Amenohoakari (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused family tree. Articles use a different tree. Gonnym (talk) 06:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Ontario rail network[edit]

Template:Ontario rail network (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route map. Gonnym (talk) 06:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:OpenMusicLibrary[edit]

Template:OpenMusicLibrary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:NonTOC-heading[edit]

Template:NonTOC-heading (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused section header template. In articles this shouldn't be used and in non-articles we have Template:Fake heading. Gonnym (talk) 06:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Newspaper of record[edit]

Template:Newspaper of record (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused wikidata related template. Gonnym (talk) 06:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Keep, albeit a little weakly. The nominator seems to be under the misimpression that a template being unused is by itself sufficient grounds for deletion. It is not. This template was developed for potential use in a Module:Find sources template, and while it wasn't initially adopted, it might be in the future, and given that its development stage is appropriately tagged and that retaining it is cheap, that provides grounds for keeping. It is also relevant for editors looking at the history of the creation of the find sources module, and could have other uses for editors seeking for other reasons to associate a country with its newspaper(s) of record. Sdkb ^talk 06:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
The commentor above is under the misimpression that the nominator does not know how TfD works and that hundred of templates get deleted on a weekly bases for being unused. 3 years being unused is a clear indication that either the template creator has abandoned a template or that the community does not want it. Both are valid grounds for deletion. Gonnym (talk) 08:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
and has no likelihood of being used isn't exactly ambiguous, and is bolded for good reason. To the extent it's not being followed, it ought to be — even when there's only a small chance they'll be used in the future, the maintenance cost of retaining templates is minimal (particularly when their documentation is clear, as here). Deletion for the sake of deletion does not benefit the encyclopedia. Sdkb ^talk 14:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:NCRTD[edit]

Template:NCRTD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route map. Gonnym (talk) 06:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Agree , I doubt I'll figure out BSicons soon enough to make it presentable for NCRTD. Arlo James Barnes 06:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm sure you can ask for help at the train wikiproject. Gonnym (talk) 08:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Mountain link[edit]

Template:Mountain link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused mix of a link and a citation template. Gonnym (talk) 06:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Monument row[edit]

Template:Monument row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused table related template. Gonnym (talk) 06:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Metadata Population Turkish province[edit]

Template:Metadata Population Turkish province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused population database template. Gonnym (talk) 06:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Medrxiv[edit]

Template:Medrxiv (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:MPBL season-by-season team history[edit]

Template:MPBL season-by-season team history (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navigation template with all links being redirects. Gonnym (talk) 06:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:MPDC Vehicle[edit]

Template:MPDC Vehicle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused table related template. Gonnym (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:MVLSZ profile[edit]

Template:MVLSZ profile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:MSW3 Dermoptera[edit]

Template:MSW3 Dermoptera (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused citation template. Gonnym (talk) 06:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Lok Sabha website[edit]

Template:Lok Sabha website (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Leo Baeck Institute - DigiBaeck[edit]

Template:Leo Baeck Institute - DigiBaeck (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:HK U23 Football Team squad[edit]

Template:HK U23 Football Team squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox for a football team that dissolved. Gonnym (talk) 06:20, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Glaciers of James Ross Island[edit]

Template:Glaciers of James Ross Island (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and empty navbox. Gonnym (talk) 06:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Abu Dhabi princely family[edit]

Template:Abu Dhabi princely family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar that acts like a family tree. Gonnym (talk) 06:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Files for discussion[edit]

June 20[edit]

File:Rod Stewart - Your Song.png[edit]

Cover art of modestly or less successful (or lesser known) cover recording, despite being charted, of an Elton John song. Unconvinced that the cover art improves understanding of the previously recorded song or the cover recording itself. Unconvinced that omitting this image would impact such understanding. May not contextually signify the song at all. George Ho (talk) 05:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Franz Ferdinand - Right Thoughts Right Words Right Action-cover.jpg[edit]

File:Franz Ferdinand - Right Thoughts Right Words Right Action-cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Fair use album cover. Text on arrows is likely between pretty high US and wery low UK TOO (Franz Ferdinand is British band.) Michalg95 (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Categories for discussion[edit]

June 20[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS[edit]

Category:Permadeath games[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Permadeath games to Category:Permadeath video games

Nominator's rationale: For consistency with similar category names in "Video games by gameplay element". Also because I recently created a separate category for permadeath role-playing games. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 15:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Stereolab songs[edit]

Propose merging Category:Stereolab songs to Category:Stereolab

Nominator's rationale: Sole entry is a redirect. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:High Peak[edit]

Propose merging Category:High Peak to Category:High Peak, Derbyshire

Nominator's rationale: Recreation of existing category. Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Tamil Nadu MLAs 1967–1972[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Tamil Nadu MLAs 1967–1972 to Category:Tamil Nadu MLAs 1967–1971

Nominator's rationale: This category is for people elected in the 1967 election. Given that the next election was in 1971, I believe this category's name should be corrected accordingly. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Comment Is this category supposed to refer to when the politicians were elected or when they took office? Inter&anthro (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Game of Thrones templates[edit]

Propose deleting Category:Game of Thrones templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Category for a single template. Unnecessary level. Add the template to the parent category. Gonnym (talk) 05:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:The Taste contestants[edit]

Propose merging Category:The Taste contestants to Category:Participants in American reality television series and Category:Reality cooking competition contestants

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There is only one person in this category for a tv show that ran for 3 seasons Mason (talk) 04:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Buildings and structures completed by year, before 1000[edit]

Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 565 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 560s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 574 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 570s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 586 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 587 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 588 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 589 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 593 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 597 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 598 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 599 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 590s

494 additional categories

Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 602 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 603 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 604 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 607 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 608 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 610 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 612 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 614 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 618 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 622 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 623 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 627 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 629 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 630 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 632 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 634 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 635 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 636 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 638 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 639 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 640 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 641 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 643 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 644 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 646 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 648 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 649 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 650 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 651 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 652 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 653 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 655 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 656 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 657 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 661 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 662 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 666 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 667 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 669 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 670 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 672 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 674 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 675 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 676 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 678 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 680 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 681 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 682 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 684 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 691 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 692 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 696 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 697 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 698 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 700 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 703 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 704 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 705 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 709 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 710 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 713 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 714 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 715 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 716 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 717 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 718 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 719 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 720 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 721 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 722 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 724 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 725 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 726 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 727 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 728 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 729 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 730 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 731 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 732 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 734 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 736 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 737 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 738 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 739 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 740 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 741 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 743 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 745 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 746 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 747 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 748 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 749 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 750 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 752 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 753 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 756 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 759 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 760 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 761 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 762 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 763 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 764 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 765 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 766 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 767 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 768 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 770 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 772 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 774 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 775 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 776 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 777 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 778 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 780 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 783 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 788 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 789 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 793 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 794 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 796 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 799 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 800 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 802 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 803 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 804 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 805 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 806 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 807 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 809 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 811 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 810s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 816 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 810s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 822 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 824 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 826 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 828 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 830 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 832 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 833 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 835 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 842 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 844 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 845 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 847 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 848 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 849 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 850 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 852 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 853 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 854 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 857 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 858 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 859 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 860 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 862 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 864 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 865 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 870 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 870s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 871 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 870s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 875 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 870s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 880 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 884 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 885 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 886 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 888 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 889 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 890 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 891 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 895 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 896 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 898 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 901 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 903 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 904 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 905 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 907 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 908 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 910 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 913 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 914 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 916 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 918 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 920 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 921 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 924 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 927 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 930 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 934 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 935 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 936 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 940 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 942 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 944 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 945 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 947 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 948 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 949 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 950 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 952 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 953 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 954 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 955 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 956 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 957 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 958 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 959 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 960 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 960s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 964 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 960s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 970 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 970s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 972 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 970s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 977 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 970s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 980 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 980s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 988 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 980s
Propose merging Category:Buildings and structures completed in 996 to Category:Buildings and structures completed in the 990s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 565 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 560s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 574 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 570s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 586 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 587 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 588 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 589 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 580s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 593 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 598 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 599 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 603 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 604 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 607 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 610 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 612 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 614 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 618 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 622 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 623 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 629 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 630 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 632 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 634 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 635 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 636 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 638 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 639 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 640 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 641 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 643 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 644 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 646 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 648 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 649 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 650 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 651 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 652 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 653 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 655 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 656 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 657 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 661 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 662 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 666 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 667 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 669 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 670 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 672 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 674 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 675 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 676 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 678 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 680 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 681 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 682 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 691 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 692 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 696 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 697 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 698 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 700 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 703 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 704 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 705 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 709 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 710 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 713 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 714 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 715 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 716 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 717 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 718 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 719 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 720 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 721 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 722 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 724 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 725 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 726 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 728 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 730 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 731 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 732 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 734 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 736 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 737 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 738 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 739 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 740 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 741 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 743 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 745 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 746 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 747 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 748 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 749 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 750 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 752 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 753 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 756 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 759 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 760 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 762 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 763 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 764 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 765 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 766 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 767 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 768 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 770 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 772 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 774 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 776 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 777 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 778 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 780 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 783 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 788 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 789 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 793 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 794 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 796 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 800 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 802 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 804 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 805 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 806 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 807 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 809 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 816 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 810s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 822 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 824 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 826 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 828 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 820s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 830 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 832 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 833 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 835 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 830s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 842 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 844 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 845 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 847 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 848 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 849 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 840s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 850 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 852 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 853 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 854 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 857 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 858 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 859 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 850s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 860 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 862 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 864 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 865 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 860s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 870 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 870s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 871 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 870s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 875 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 870s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 880 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 884 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 885 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 888 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 889 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 880s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 890 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 891 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 895 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 896 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 898 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 890s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 901 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 904 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 905 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 907 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 908 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 900s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 910 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 916 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 918 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 910s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 920 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 921 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 924 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 927 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 920s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 930 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 934 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 935 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 936 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 930s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 940 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 942 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 944 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 945 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 947 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 948 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 949 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 940s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 950 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 952 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 953 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 954 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 955 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 956 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 957 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 958 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 959 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 950s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 960 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 960s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 964 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 960s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 970 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 970s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 972 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 970s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 977 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 970s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 980 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 980s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 988 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 980s
Propose merging Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 996 to Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 990s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 565 to Category:Churches completed in the 560s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 598 to Category:Churches completed in the 590s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 603 to Category:Churches completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 604 to Category:Churches completed in the 600s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 612 to Category:Churches completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 614 to Category:Churches completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 618 to Category:Churches completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 630 to Category:Churches completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 632 to Category:Churches completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 634 to Category:Churches completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 635 to Category:Churches completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 639 to Category:Churches completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 640 to Category:Churches completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 648 to Category:Churches completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 649 to Category:Churches completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 652 to Category:Churches completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 655 to Category:Churches completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 657 to Category:Churches completed in the 650s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 661 to Category:Churches completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 666 to Category:Churches completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 667 to Category:Churches completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 669 to Category:Churches completed in the 660s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 672 to Category:Churches completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 674 to Category:Churches completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 675 to Category:Churches completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 680 to Category:Churches completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 681 to Category:Churches completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 682 to Category:Churches completed in the 680s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 696 to Category:Churches completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 697 to Category:Churches completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 700 to Category:Churches completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 705 to Category:Churches completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 710 to Category:Churches completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 714 to Category:Churches completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 715 to Category:Churches completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 717 to Category:Churches completed in the 710s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 721 to Category:Churches completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 724 to Category:Churches completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 726 to Category:Churches completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 728 to Category:Churches completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 734 to Category:Churches completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 736 to Category:Churches completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 737 to Category:Churches completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 739 to Category:Churches completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 740 to Category:Churches completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 743 to Category:Churches completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 745 to Category:Churches completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 748 to Category:Churches completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 749 to Category:Churches completed in the 740s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 750 to Category:Churches completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 752 to Category:Churches completed in the 750s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 760 to Category:Churches completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 762 to Category:Churches completed in the 760s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 770 to Category:Churches completed in the 770s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 780 to Category:Churches completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 783 to Category:Churches completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 789 to Category:Churches completed in the 780s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 793 to Category:Churches completed in the 790s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 800 to Category:Churches completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 804 to Category:Churches completed in the 800s
Propose merging Category:Churches completed in 980 to Category:Churches completed in the 980s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 610 to Category:Mosques completed in the 610s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 622 to Category:Mosques completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 629 to Category:Mosques completed in the 620s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 630 to Category:Mosques completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 638 to Category:Mosques completed in the 630s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 641 to Category:Mosques completed in the 640s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 670 to Category:Mosques completed in the 670s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 691 to Category:Mosques completed in the 690s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 703 to Category:Mosques completed in the 700s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 720 to Category:Mosques completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 721 to Category:Mosques completed in the 720s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 731 to Category:Mosques completed in the 730s
Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 972 to Category:Mosques completed in the 970s

Nominator's rationale: A long list of WP:OCYEAR categories — 504 in total — that all contain 3 or fewer unique articles each, overwhelmingly about religious buildings. However, almost all of these years have enough categories to justify a decade category. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Dual merge, also to Category:565 establishments, etc. Nom is right, this is a redundant category layer for this period. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Dual merge per Marcocapelle. By the way, there are probably several articles about buildings from this era which were never categorized in an establishment category. Dimadick (talk) 07:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion[edit]

June 20[edit]

SportAccord[edit]

SportAccord → Global Association of International Sports Federations (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Removal/deletion of current redirect as it creates misleading impression. The redirect page reflects the name of a separate organization with its own initiatives whereas the target page reflects another organization that is now dissolved. In the current target page there's even a proposal on the Talk page from someone addressing this confusion. There should be a separate page and information about the redirect page of SportAccord JennyAnderson 2 (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Miscellany for deletion[edit]

See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, as MfD uses subpages for the nominations like AfD but places them within the process's main page.

Speedy deletion[edit]

See Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

Proposed deletion[edit]

See Category:Proposed deletion as of 20 June 2024.

Copyright problems[edit]